Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2023-09-18

Map

Map

Alcona	Williams	32.8%
	Griffin	67.0%
	Other	0.2%

Alger	Williams	51.6%
	Griffin	48.4%
	Other	0.0%

Allegan	Williams	26.3%
	Griffin	73.5%
	Other	0.2%

Alpena	Williams	37.6%
	Griffin	62.3%
	Other	0.2%

Antrim	Williams	29.6%
	Griffin	70.3%
	Other	0.1%

Arenac	Williams	38.9%
	Griffin	60.9%
	Other	0.2%

Baraga	Williams	48.6%
	Griffin	51.2%
	Other	0.3%

Barry	Williams	33.3%
	Griffin	66.5%
	Other	0.2%

Bay	Williams	47.7%
	Griffin	52.2%
	Other	0.1%

Benzie	Williams	28.7%
	Griffin	71.0%
	Other	0.3%

Berrien	Williams	35.7%
	Griffin	64.0%
	Other	0.3%

Branch	Williams	34.0%
	Griffin	65.9%
	Other	0.1%

Calhoun	Williams	38.8%
	Griffin	61.0%
	Other	0.2%

Cass	Williams	40.8%
	Griffin	58.9%
	Other	0.3%

Charlevoix	Williams	33.9%
	Griffin	66.0%
	Other	0.1%

Cheboygan	Williams	39.3%
	Griffin	60.6%
	Other	0.1%

Chippewa	Williams	39.7%
	Griffin	60.2%
	Other	0.1%

Clare	Williams	32.0%
	Griffin	67.8%
	Other	0.2%

Clinton	Williams	33.9%
	Griffin	65.9%
	Other	0.2%

Crawford	Williams	34.8%
	Griffin	64.9%
	Other	0.2%

Delta	Williams	49.0%
	Griffin	50.9%
	Other	0.1%

Dickinson	Williams	48.9%
	Griffin	51.0%
	Other	0.1%

Eaton	Williams	33.9%
	Griffin	65.9%
	Other	0.2%

Emmet	Williams	32.6%
	Griffin	67.3%
	Other	0.1%

Genesee	Williams	45.2%
	Griffin	54.6%
	Other	0.2%

Gladwin	Williams	33.9%
	Griffin	66.0%
	Other	0.1%

Gogebic	Williams	52.2%
	Griffin	47.5%
	Other	0.3%

Grand Traverse	Williams	27.2%
	Griffin	72.6%
	Other	0.2%

Gratiot	Williams	29.0%
	Griffin	70.8%
	Other	0.1%

Hillsdale	Williams	27.7%
	Griffin	72.1%
	Other	0.1%

Houghton	Williams	48.3%
	Griffin	51.7%
	Other	0.1%

Huron	Williams	29.3%
	Griffin	70.6%
	Other	0.1%

Ingham	Williams	36.9%
	Griffin	62.9%
	Other	0.3%

Ionia	Williams	36.0%
	Griffin	63.8%
	Other	0.2%

Iosco	Williams	32.3%
	Griffin	67.6%
	Other	0.1%

Iron	Williams	53.1%
	Griffin	46.7%
	Other	0.2%

Isabella	Williams	32.8%
	Griffin	67.0%
	Other	0.2%

Jackson	Williams	34.6%
	Griffin	65.2%
	Other	0.2%

Kalamazoo	Williams	32.1%
	Griffin	67.6%
	Other	0.3%

Kalkaska	Williams	34.2%
	Griffin	65.8%

Kent	Williams	32.6%
	Griffin	67.2%
	Other	0.2%

Keweenaw	Williams	54.9%
	Griffin	44.9%
	Other	0.2%

Lake	Williams	50.9%
	Griffin	48.9%
	Other	0.2%

Lapeer	Williams	32.8%
	Griffin	67.1%
	Other	0.1%

Leelanau	Williams	31.2%
	Griffin	68.6%
	Other	0.1%

Lenawee	Williams	31.5%
	Griffin	68.3%
	Other	0.2%

Livingston	Williams	32.4%
	Griffin	67.4%
	Other	0.2%

Luce	Williams	37.1%
	Griffin	62.9%
	Other	0.1%

Mackinac	Williams	36.5%
	Griffin	63.3%
	Other	0.2%

Macomb	Williams	50.2%
	Griffin	49.5%
	Other	0.3%

Manistee	Williams	38.4%
	Griffin	61.5%
	Other	0.1%

Marquette	Williams	47.1%
	Griffin	52.8%
	Other	0.2%

Mason	Williams	39.6%
	Griffin	60.3%
	Other	0.0%

Mecosta	Williams	30.1%
	Griffin	69.8%
	Other	0.2%

Menominee	Williams	45.0%
	Griffin	54.8%
	Other	0.2%

Midland	Williams	29.1%
	Griffin	70.5%
	Other	0.4%

Missaukee	Williams	22.9%
	Griffin	77.0%
	Other	0.2%

Monroe	Williams	45.1%
	Griffin	54.6%
	Other	0.3%

Montcalm	Williams	32.1%
	Griffin	67.8%
	Other	0.1%

Montmorency	Williams	36.0%
	Griffin	64.0%
	Other	0.1%

Muskegon	Williams	39.5%
	Griffin	60.2%
	Other	0.2%

Newaygo	Williams	28.1%
	Griffin	71.8%
	Other	0.1%

Oakland	Williams	35.1%
	Griffin	64.6%
	Other	0.3%

Oceana	Williams	32.1%
	Griffin	67.8%
	Other	0.1%

Ogemaw	Williams	37.1%
	Griffin	62.8%
	Other	0.1%

Ontonagon	Williams	50.4%
	Griffin	49.5%
	Other	0.1%

Osceola	Williams	25.4%
	Griffin	74.5%
	Other	0.1%

Oscoda	Williams	28.6%
	Griffin	71.1%
	Other	0.3%

Otsego	Williams	39.6%
	Griffin	60.3%
	Other	0.1%

Ottawa	Williams	22.6%
	Griffin	77.2%
	Other	0.1%

Presque Isle	Williams	44.2%
	Griffin	55.7%
	Other	0.0%

Roscommon	Williams	33.1%
	Griffin	66.8%
	Other	0.1%

Saginaw	Williams	40.6%
	Griffin	59.2%
	Other	0.2%

St. Clair	Williams	33.5%
	Griffin	66.4%
	Other	0.2%

St. Joseph	Williams	29.2%
	Griffin	70.6%
	Other	0.2%

Sanilac	Williams	23.3%
	Griffin	76.6%
	Other	0.1%

Schoolcraft	Williams	45.9%
	Griffin	54.1%
	Other	0.0%

Shiawassee	Williams	38.8%
	Griffin	61.0%
	Other	0.2%

Tuscola	Williams	31.1%
	Griffin	68.8%
	Other	0.1%

Van Buren	Williams	34.0%
	Griffin	65.7%
	Other	0.3%

Washtenaw	Williams	33.1%
	Griffin	65.8%
	Other	1.0%

Wayne	Williams	57.7%
	Griffin	42.0%
	Other	0.4%

Wexford	Williams	32.6%
	Griffin	67.1%
	Other	0.2%

National DataGraph for 1966 - Michigan Results for 1966

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved