Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-07-05

Map

Map

Barbour	Oliverio	15.6%
	Underwood	79.7%
	McCase	3.1%
	Other	1.6%

Berkeley	Oliverio	8.6%
	Underwood	81.7%
	McCase	6.1%
	Other	3.6%

Boone	Oliverio	10.3%
	Underwood	81.6%
	McCase	3.6%
	Other	4.5%

Braxton	Oliverio	13.4%
	Underwood	78.0%
	McCase	5.9%
	Other	2.6%

Brooke	Oliverio	6.4%
	Underwood	85.8%
	McCase	6.2%
	Other	1.6%

Cabell	Oliverio	5.5%
	Underwood	88.7%
	McCase	4.0%
	Other	1.8%

Calhoun	Oliverio	6.1%
	Underwood	88.5%
	McCase	2.9%
	Other	2.5%

Clay	Oliverio	9.5%
	Underwood	79.6%
	McCase	7.8%
	Other	3.1%

Doddridge	Oliverio	15.1%
	Underwood	79.5%
	McCase	3.4%
	Other	2.0%

Fayette	Oliverio	12.8%
	Underwood	76.8%
	McCase	7.0%
	Other	3.4%

Gilmer	Oliverio	15.1%
	Underwood	74.4%
	McCase	4.5%
	Other	6.0%

Grant	Oliverio	6.7%
	Underwood	86.1%
	McCase	5.1%
	Other	2.2%

Greenbrier	Oliverio	8.1%
	Underwood	83.8%
	McCase	5.3%
	Other	2.8%

Hampshire	Oliverio	4.1%
	Underwood	88.2%
	McCase	5.8%
	Other	1.9%

Hancock	Oliverio	7.4%
	Underwood	82.0%
	McCase	7.9%
	Other	2.7%

Hardy	Oliverio	4.2%
	Underwood	91.1%
	McCase	2.5%
	Other	2.3%

Harrison	Oliverio	16.3%
	Underwood	75.1%
	McCase	5.5%
	Other	3.1%

Jackson	Oliverio	6.8%
	Underwood	81.9%
	McCase	7.1%
	Other	4.3%

Jefferson	Oliverio	6.3%
	Underwood	80.9%
	McCase	8.3%
	Other	4.4%

Kanawha	Oliverio	15.5%
	Underwood	77.3%
	McCase	4.9%
	Other	2.3%

Lewis	Oliverio	21.7%
	Underwood	72.1%
	McCase	4.3%
	Other	1.9%

Lincoln	Oliverio	4.2%
	Underwood	90.9%
	McCase	2.7%
	Other	2.3%

Logan	Oliverio	6.1%
	Underwood	72.8%
	McCase	10.0%
	Other	11.1%

McDowell	Oliverio	2.5%
	Underwood	92.1%
	McCase	2.5%
	Other	2.9%

Marion	Oliverio	18.9%
	Underwood	73.6%
	McCase	5.0%
	Other	2.5%

Marshall	Oliverio	7.5%
	Underwood	83.6%
	McCase	6.6%
	Other	2.3%

Mason	Oliverio	4.7%
	Underwood	86.3%
	McCase	6.0%
	Other	3.0%

Mercer	Oliverio	9.9%
	Underwood	83.3%
	McCase	4.7%
	Other	2.1%

Mineral	Oliverio	6.2%
	Underwood	84.7%
	McCase	6.7%
	Other	2.4%

Mingo	Oliverio	3.6%
	Underwood	90.4%
	McCase	3.9%
	Other	2.2%

Monongalia	Oliverio	20.7%
	Underwood	71.2%
	McCase	5.0%
	Other	3.1%

Monroe	Oliverio	2.9%
	Underwood	90.9%
	McCase	3.9%
	Other	2.3%

Morgan	Oliverio	4.7%
	Underwood	87.7%
	McCase	5.1%
	Other	2.5%

Nicholas	Oliverio	11.6%
	Underwood	78.6%
	McCase	6.0%
	Other	3.8%

Ohio	Oliverio	9.8%
	Underwood	83.9%
	McCase	4.8%
	Other	1.5%

Pendleton	Oliverio	3.4%
	Underwood	91.5%
	McCase	3.7%
	Other	1.4%

Pleasants	Oliverio	7.7%
	Underwood	87.0%
	McCase	3.9%
	Other	1.4%

Pocahontas	Oliverio	10.7%
	Underwood	79.8%
	McCase	6.6%
	Other	2.9%

Preston	Oliverio	18.8%
	Underwood	74.2%
	McCase	4.7%
	Other	2.3%

Putnam	Oliverio	12.1%
	Underwood	79.6%
	McCase	5.7%
	Other	2.5%

Raleigh	Oliverio	13.6%
	Underwood	78.2%
	McCase	5.6%
	Other	2.6%

Randolph	Oliverio	11.2%
	Underwood	81.7%
	McCase	5.7%
	Other	1.3%

Ritchie	Oliverio	9.7%
	Underwood	81.7%
	McCase	5.4%
	Other	3.2%

Roane	Oliverio	7.4%
	Underwood	82.9%
	McCase	7.0%
	Other	2.7%

Summers	Oliverio	8.3%
	Underwood	82.7%
	McCase	6.6%
	Other	2.3%

Taylor	Oliverio	17.0%
	Underwood	77.6%
	McCase	3.1%
	Other	2.3%

Tucker	Oliverio	14.0%
	Underwood	79.1%
	McCase	4.7%
	Other	2.2%

Tyler	Oliverio	5.1%
	Underwood	90.2%
	McCase	3.4%
	Other	1.3%

Upshur	Oliverio	17.0%
	Underwood	76.2%
	McCase	3.2%
	Other	3.6%

Wayne	Oliverio	5.6%
	Underwood	86.1%
	McCase	4.8%
	Other	3.5%

Webster	Oliverio	11.8%
	Underwood	75.4%
	McCase	10.2%
	Other	2.7%

Wetzel	Oliverio	7.4%
	Underwood	85.9%
	McCase	4.8%
	Other	2.0%

Wirt	Oliverio	5.8%
	Underwood	83.0%
	McCase	6.3%
	Other	4.9%

Wood	Oliverio	5.3%
	Underwood	80.2%
	McCase	8.4%
	Other	6.1%

Wyoming	Oliverio	6.4%
	Underwood	84.5%
	McCase	5.4%
	Other	3.7%

National DataGraph for 2000 - West Virginia Results for 2000

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved