Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2011-12-06

Map

Map

Adams	Haabestad	21.4%
	Specter	13.4%
	Howard	7.9%
	Other	57.3%

Allegheny	Haabestad	45.7%
	Specter	32.8%
	Howard	11.1%
	Other	10.5%

Armstrong	Haabestad	33.8%
	Specter	25.9%
	Howard	16.7%
	Other	23.7%

Beaver	Haabestad	35.1%
	Specter	29.8%
	Howard	14.1%
	Other	21.0%

Bedford	Haabestad	26.5%
	Specter	38.6%
	Howard	14.0%
	Other	20.9%

Berks	Haabestad	28.0%
	Specter	45.0%
	Howard	11.0%
	Other	15.9%

Blair	Haabestad	34.9%
	Specter	36.1%
	Howard	10.0%
	Other	19.1%

Bradford	Haabestad	12.5%
	Specter	20.1%
	Howard	12.3%
	Other	55.1%

Bucks	Haabestad	9.3%
	Specter	33.2%
	Howard	51.8%
	Other	5.7%

Butler	Haabestad	33.2%
	Specter	23.3%
	Howard	20.8%
	Other	22.7%

Cambria	Haabestad	26.4%
	Specter	43.3%
	Howard	10.1%
	Other	20.2%

Cameron	Haabestad	21.0%
	Specter	27.8%
	Howard	14.6%
	Other	36.6%

Carbon	Haabestad	20.6%
	Specter	47.9%
	Howard	10.4%
	Other	21.1%

Centre	Haabestad	22.2%
	Specter	33.9%
	Howard	18.8%
	Other	25.1%

Chester	Haabestad	43.4%
	Specter	41.7%
	Howard	6.6%
	Other	8.3%

Clarion	Haabestad	30.5%
	Specter	30.3%
	Howard	15.6%
	Other	23.6%

Clearfield	Haabestad	25.1%
	Specter	34.3%
	Howard	14.3%
	Other	26.3%

Clinton	Haabestad	24.4%
	Specter	38.4%
	Howard	13.6%
	Other	23.6%

Columbia	Haabestad	18.8%
	Specter	36.9%
	Howard	8.1%
	Other	36.2%

Crawford	Haabestad	22.6%
	Specter	32.1%
	Howard	20.3%
	Other	25.0%

Cumberland	Haabestad	30.9%
	Specter	35.2%
	Howard	12.8%
	Other	21.1%

Dauphin	Haabestad	28.0%
	Specter	39.7%
	Howard	10.1%
	Other	22.2%

Delaware	Haabestad	62.8%
	Specter	24.9%
	Howard	2.5%
	Other	9.7%

Elk	Haabestad	27.8%
	Specter	26.7%
	Howard	14.6%
	Other	30.9%

Erie	Haabestad	29.9%
	Specter	42.9%
	Howard	14.5%
	Other	12.7%

Fayette	Haabestad	38.4%
	Specter	29.4%
	Howard	11.1%
	Other	21.2%

Forest	Haabestad	26.1%
	Specter	36.5%
	Howard	12.4%
	Other	24.9%

Franklin	Haabestad	16.1%
	Specter	14.7%
	Howard	13.3%
	Other	55.8%

Fulton	Haabestad	16.9%
	Specter	22.9%
	Howard	14.0%
	Other	46.2%

Greene	Haabestad	37.4%
	Specter	28.0%
	Howard	12.0%
	Other	22.5%

Huntingdon	Haabestad	29.1%
	Specter	41.1%
	Howard	8.6%
	Other	21.1%

Indiana	Haabestad	27.8%
	Specter	31.2%
	Howard	16.6%
	Other	24.4%

Jefferson	Haabestad	28.4%
	Specter	25.2%
	Howard	20.9%
	Other	25.5%

Juniata	Haabestad	22.2%
	Specter	42.6%
	Howard	11.1%
	Other	24.0%

Lackawanna	Haabestad	22.8%
	Specter	41.2%
	Howard	15.6%
	Other	20.4%

Lancaster	Haabestad	33.1%
	Specter	43.7%
	Howard	9.1%
	Other	14.2%

Lawrence	Haabestad	25.2%
	Specter	28.3%
	Howard	19.1%
	Other	27.4%

Lebanon	Haabestad	33.8%
	Specter	23.6%
	Howard	18.7%
	Other	24.0%

Lehigh	Haabestad	19.7%
	Specter	56.3%
	Howard	13.1%
	Other	10.9%

Luzerne	Haabestad	22.6%
	Specter	36.2%
	Howard	10.9%
	Other	30.3%

Lycoming	Haabestad	19.8%
	Specter	35.4%
	Howard	15.6%
	Other	29.3%

McKean	Haabestad	19.0%
	Specter	16.2%
	Howard	39.1%
	Other	25.6%

Mercer	Haabestad	23.3%
	Specter	24.5%
	Howard	27.8%
	Other	24.4%

Mifflin	Haabestad	40.3%
	Specter	25.4%
	Howard	12.3%
	Other	21.9%

Monroe	Haabestad	16.4%
	Specter	38.7%
	Howard	22.6%
	Other	22.3%

Montgomery	Haabestad	41.7%
	Specter	41.0%
	Howard	10.2%
	Other	7.1%

Montour	Haabestad	23.4%
	Specter	31.6%
	Howard	7.2%
	Other	37.8%

Northampton	Haabestad	20.3%
	Specter	50.4%
	Howard	18.5%
	Other	10.8%

Northumberland	Haabestad	19.8%
	Specter	43.3%
	Howard	12.8%
	Other	24.1%

Perry	Haabestad	24.6%
	Specter	32.5%
	Howard	9.8%
	Other	33.1%

Philadelphia	Haabestad	27.6%
	Specter	59.4%
	Howard	5.2%
	Other	7.8%

Pike	Haabestad	15.4%
	Specter	15.3%
	Howard	36.9%
	Other	32.4%

Potter	Haabestad	7.4%
	Specter	22.6%
	Howard	26.8%
	Other	43.3%

Schuylkill	Haabestad	18.3%
	Specter	35.6%
	Howard	3.3%
	Other	42.8%

Snyder	Haabestad	20.4%
	Specter	29.4%
	Howard	10.2%
	Other	40.0%

Somerset	Haabestad	23.0%
	Specter	35.0%
	Howard	14.8%
	Other	27.1%

Sullivan	Haabestad	16.4%
	Specter	30.6%
	Howard	8.7%
	Other	44.3%

Susquehanna	Haabestad	14.5%
	Specter	14.5%
	Howard	7.9%
	Other	63.1%

Tioga	Haabestad	6.2%
	Specter	13.7%
	Howard	17.2%
	Other	62.9%

Union	Haabestad	21.7%
	Specter	29.7%
	Howard	11.6%
	Other	36.9%

Venango	Haabestad	26.1%
	Specter	31.3%
	Howard	16.5%
	Other	26.0%

Warren	Haabestad	20.4%
	Specter	36.4%
	Howard	22.4%
	Other	20.9%

Washington	Haabestad	45.1%
	Specter	27.2%
	Howard	10.7%
	Other	17.1%

Wayne	Haabestad	15.7%
	Specter	27.5%
	Howard	28.5%
	Other	28.3%

Westmoreland	Haabestad	40.8%
	Specter	30.8%
	Howard	16.3%
	Other	12.0%

Wyoming	Haabestad	22.3%
	Specter	27.0%
	Howard	5.8%
	Other	44.8%

York	Haabestad	31.0%
	Specter	27.1%
	Howard	13.5%
	Other	28.4%

National DataGraph for 1980 - Pennsylvania Results for 1980

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved