Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2023-02-17

Map

Map

Adair	Shannon	5.8%
	Mullin	76.9%
	Dahm	4.3%
	Other	13.0%

Alfalfa	Shannon	17.2%
	Mullin	34.5%
	Dahm	11.7%
	Other	36.5%

Atoka	Shannon	6.6%
	Mullin	77.4%
	Dahm	4.3%
	Other	11.7%

Beaver	Shannon	18.8%
	Mullin	41.6%
	Dahm	7.0%
	Other	32.7%

Beckham	Shannon	20.0%
	Mullin	39.4%
	Dahm	6.1%
	Other	34.4%

Blaine	Shannon	19.8%
	Mullin	38.5%
	Dahm	6.0%
	Other	35.6%

Bryan	Shannon	7.2%
	Mullin	69.7%
	Dahm	8.1%
	Other	15.0%

Caddo	Shannon	20.0%
	Mullin	39.0%
	Dahm	5.7%
	Other	35.4%

Canadian	Shannon	23.5%
	Mullin	35.6%
	Dahm	10.5%
	Other	30.5%

Carter	Shannon	10.5%
	Mullin	55.3%
	Dahm	9.3%
	Other	24.8%

Cherokee	Shannon	7.8%
	Mullin	62.6%
	Dahm	10.4%
	Other	19.3%

Choctaw	Shannon	6.3%
	Mullin	69.0%
	Dahm	6.6%
	Other	18.0%

Cimarron	Shannon	15.6%
	Mullin	36.4%
	Dahm	20.8%
	Other	27.2%

Cleveland	Shannon	27.2%
	Mullin	33.4%
	Dahm	8.9%
	Other	30.5%

Coal	Shannon	8.6%
	Mullin	59.1%
	Dahm	7.2%
	Other	25.1%

Comanche	Shannon	36.8%
	Mullin	25.2%
	Dahm	8.9%
	Other	29.1%

Cotton	Shannon	25.5%
	Mullin	28.9%
	Dahm	7.4%
	Other	38.1%

Craig	Shannon	7.8%
	Mullin	62.6%
	Dahm	16.9%
	Other	12.7%

Creek	Shannon	11.7%
	Mullin	52.9%
	Dahm	11.9%
	Other	23.5%

Custer	Shannon	19.0%
	Mullin	38.7%
	Dahm	10.2%
	Other	32.1%

Delaware	Shannon	9.9%
	Mullin	64.5%
	Dahm	7.5%
	Other	18.2%

Dewey	Shannon	18.5%
	Mullin	37.0%
	Dahm	13.1%
	Other	31.4%

Ellis	Shannon	21.3%
	Mullin	37.6%
	Dahm	5.7%
	Other	35.5%

Garfield	Shannon	18.5%
	Mullin	35.9%
	Dahm	10.7%
	Other	35.0%

Garvin	Shannon	17.3%
	Mullin	42.5%
	Dahm	10.1%
	Other	30.1%

Grady	Shannon	21.2%
	Mullin	39.5%
	Dahm	8.8%
	Other	30.5%

Grant	Shannon	15.2%
	Mullin	35.9%
	Dahm	13.9%
	Other	35.1%

Greer	Shannon	18.0%
	Mullin	40.6%
	Dahm	6.6%
	Other	34.8%

Harmon	Shannon	21.9%
	Mullin	38.6%
	Dahm	1.9%
	Other	37.7%

Harper	Shannon	22.1%
	Mullin	39.2%
	Dahm	6.5%
	Other	32.3%

Haskell	Shannon	6.9%
	Mullin	67.5%
	Dahm	11.0%
	Other	14.6%

Hughes	Shannon	14.2%
	Mullin	59.1%
	Dahm	8.3%
	Other	18.4%

Jackson	Shannon	19.4%
	Mullin	34.1%
	Dahm	11.8%
	Other	34.7%

Jefferson	Shannon	12.4%
	Mullin	37.7%
	Dahm	17.0%
	Other	32.9%

Johnston	Shannon	7.2%
	Mullin	70.0%
	Dahm	5.6%
	Other	17.2%

Kay	Shannon	17.6%
	Mullin	36.9%
	Dahm	12.3%
	Other	33.2%

Kingfisher	Shannon	23.3%
	Mullin	28.5%
	Dahm	6.4%
	Other	41.9%

Kiowa	Shannon	21.9%
	Mullin	40.5%
	Dahm	7.5%
	Other	30.1%

Latimer	Shannon	7.9%
	Mullin	74.0%
	Dahm	5.3%
	Other	12.9%

Le Flore	Shannon	5.3%
	Mullin	62.2%
	Dahm	13.3%
	Other	19.2%

Lincoln	Shannon	18.6%
	Mullin	35.5%
	Dahm	7.5%
	Other	38.5%

Logan	Shannon	19.9%
	Mullin	37.5%
	Dahm	13.0%
	Other	29.6%

Love	Shannon	6.8%
	Mullin	70.6%
	Dahm	3.8%
	Other	18.8%

McClain	Shannon	22.2%
	Mullin	39.1%
	Dahm	11.7%
	Other	26.9%

McCurtain	Shannon	5.0%
	Mullin	75.4%
	Dahm	6.6%
	Other	13.0%

McIntosh	Shannon	7.4%
	Mullin	66.6%
	Dahm	7.1%
	Other	18.9%

Major	Shannon	18.7%
	Mullin	36.6%
	Dahm	11.4%
	Other	33.2%

Marshall	Shannon	8.0%
	Mullin	73.3%
	Dahm	2.7%
	Other	16.0%

Mayes	Shannon	8.1%
	Mullin	65.4%
	Dahm	11.0%
	Other	15.5%

Murray	Shannon	20.8%
	Mullin	44.3%
	Dahm	6.6%
	Other	28.4%

Muskogee	Shannon	10.3%
	Mullin	63.7%
	Dahm	7.2%
	Other	18.8%

Noble	Shannon	15.0%
	Mullin	48.0%
	Dahm	5.6%
	Other	31.4%

Nowata	Shannon	6.6%
	Mullin	69.5%
	Dahm	7.1%
	Other	16.9%

Okfuskee	Shannon	10.5%
	Mullin	62.3%
	Dahm	6.9%
	Other	20.2%

Oklahoma	Shannon	25.6%
	Mullin	31.9%
	Dahm	11.0%
	Other	31.5%

Okmulgee	Shannon	7.6%
	Mullin	64.0%
	Dahm	11.0%
	Other	17.4%

Osage	Shannon	10.6%
	Mullin	55.0%
	Dahm	12.7%
	Other	21.7%

Ottawa	Shannon	6.2%
	Mullin	64.3%
	Dahm	7.6%
	Other	21.9%

Pawnee	Shannon	10.4%
	Mullin	53.4%
	Dahm	7.7%
	Other	28.5%

Payne	Shannon	16.6%
	Mullin	27.7%
	Dahm	6.5%
	Other	49.2%

Pittsburg	Shannon	8.3%
	Mullin	70.8%
	Dahm	4.4%
	Other	16.6%

Pontotoc	Shannon	22.8%
	Mullin	44.2%
	Dahm	7.7%
	Other	25.2%

Pottawatomie	Shannon	20.4%
	Mullin	38.5%
	Dahm	9.8%
	Other	31.3%

Pushmataha	Shannon	8.9%
	Mullin	71.6%
	Dahm	3.6%
	Other	15.9%

Roger Mills	Shannon	17.7%
	Mullin	46.5%
	Dahm	5.4%
	Other	30.4%

Rogers	Shannon	11.5%
	Mullin	57.0%
	Dahm	13.0%
	Other	18.4%

Seminole	Shannon	17.7%
	Mullin	41.9%
	Dahm	14.6%
	Other	25.8%

Sequoyah	Shannon	5.6%
	Mullin	61.1%
	Dahm	17.2%
	Other	16.1%

Stephens	Shannon	21.7%
	Mullin	33.7%
	Dahm	11.5%
	Other	33.1%

Texas	Shannon	15.2%
	Mullin	35.4%
	Dahm	13.1%
	Other	36.4%

Tillman	Shannon	23.3%
	Mullin	33.8%
	Dahm	5.3%
	Other	37.6%

Tulsa	Shannon	13.9%
	Mullin	43.1%
	Dahm	20.5%
	Other	22.4%

Wagoner	Shannon	10.9%
	Mullin	51.7%
	Dahm	18.2%
	Other	19.2%

Washington	Shannon	9.4%
	Mullin	42.9%
	Dahm	20.8%
	Other	26.9%

Washita	Shannon	18.9%
	Mullin	45.5%
	Dahm	6.0%
	Other	29.5%

Woods	Shannon	17.9%
	Mullin	36.9%
	Dahm	6.4%
	Other	38.7%

Woodward	Shannon	22.2%
	Mullin	40.5%
	Dahm	8.5%
	Other	28.9%

National DataGraph for 2022 - Oklahoma Results for 2022

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved