Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-07-11

Map

Map

Adair		0.0%
	Coburn	87.0%
	Other	13.0%

Alfalfa		0.0%
	Coburn	89.4%
	Other	10.6%

Atoka		0.0%
	Coburn	90.3%
	Other	9.7%

Beaver		0.0%
	Coburn	85.2%
	Other	14.8%

Beckham		0.0%
	Coburn	90.2%
	Other	9.8%

Blaine		0.0%
	Coburn	88.3%
	Other	11.7%

Bryan		0.0%
	Coburn	84.6%
	Other	15.4%

Caddo		0.0%
	Coburn	88.6%
	Other	11.4%

Canadian		0.0%
	Coburn	90.8%
	Other	9.2%

Carter		0.0%
	Coburn	89.4%
	Other	10.6%

Cherokee		0.0%
	Coburn	89.6%
	Other	10.4%

Choctaw		0.0%
	Coburn	84.7%
	Other	15.3%

Cimarron		0.0%
	Coburn	79.8%
	Other	20.2%

Cleveland		0.0%
	Coburn	89.4%
	Other	10.6%

Coal		0.0%
	Coburn	92.8%
	Other	7.2%

Comanche		0.0%
	Coburn	88.3%
	Other	11.7%

Cotton		0.0%
	Coburn	89.4%
	Other	10.6%

Craig		0.0%
	Coburn	92.7%
	Other	7.3%

Creek		0.0%
	Coburn	90.1%
	Other	9.9%

Custer		0.0%
	Coburn	91.1%
	Other	8.9%

Delaware		0.0%
	Coburn	89.2%
	Other	10.8%

Dewey		0.0%
	Coburn	90.9%
	Other	9.1%

Ellis		0.0%
	Coburn	90.1%
	Other	9.9%

Garfield		0.0%
	Coburn	90.0%
	Other	10.0%

Garvin		0.0%
	Coburn	88.8%
	Other	11.2%

Grady		0.0%
	Coburn	89.0%
	Other	11.0%

Grant		0.0%
	Coburn	88.2%
	Other	11.8%

Greer		0.0%
	Coburn	87.3%
	Other	12.7%

Harmon		0.0%
	Coburn	86.6%
	Other	13.4%

Harper		0.0%
	Coburn	92.6%
	Other	7.4%

Haskell		0.0%
	Coburn	92.1%
	Other	7.9%

Hughes		0.0%
	Coburn	89.9%
	Other	10.1%

Jackson		0.0%
	Coburn	88.6%
	Other	11.4%

Jefferson		0.0%
	Coburn	85.1%
	Other	14.9%

Johnston		0.0%
	Coburn	81.7%
	Other	18.3%

Kay		0.0%
	Coburn	86.4%
	Other	13.6%

Kingfisher		0.0%
	Coburn	90.7%
	Other	9.3%

Kiowa		0.0%
	Coburn	87.8%
	Other	12.2%

Latimer		0.0%
	Coburn	87.0%
	Other	13.0%

Le Flore		0.0%
	Coburn	85.7%
	Other	14.3%

Lincoln		0.0%
	Coburn	88.3%
	Other	11.7%

Logan		0.0%
	Coburn	91.5%
	Other	8.5%

Love		0.0%
	Coburn	85.0%
	Other	15.0%

McClain		0.0%
	Coburn	91.2%
	Other	8.8%

McCurtain		0.0%
	Coburn	88.7%
	Other	11.3%

McIntosh		0.0%
	Coburn	91.0%
	Other	9.0%

Major		0.0%
	Coburn	88.7%
	Other	11.3%

Marshall		0.0%
	Coburn	88.7%
	Other	11.3%

Mayes		0.0%
	Coburn	89.8%
	Other	10.2%

Murray		0.0%
	Coburn	88.6%
	Other	11.4%

Muskogee		0.0%
	Coburn	93.2%
	Other	6.8%

Noble		0.0%
	Coburn	86.6%
	Other	13.4%

Nowata		0.0%
	Coburn	89.8%
	Other	10.2%

Okfuskee		0.0%
	Coburn	90.9%
	Other	9.1%

Oklahoma		0.0%
	Coburn	91.9%
	Other	8.1%

Okmulgee		0.0%
	Coburn	90.4%
	Other	9.6%

Osage		0.0%
	Coburn	89.3%
	Other	10.7%

Ottawa		0.0%
	Coburn	87.4%
	Other	12.6%

Pawnee		0.0%
	Coburn	85.8%
	Other	14.2%

Payne		0.0%
	Coburn	88.9%
	Other	11.1%

Pittsburg		0.0%
	Coburn	89.2%
	Other	10.8%

Pontotoc		0.0%
	Coburn	91.2%
	Other	8.8%

Pottawatomie		0.0%
	Coburn	91.4%
	Other	8.6%

Pushmataha		0.0%
	Coburn	82.8%
	Other	17.2%

Roger Mills		0.0%
	Coburn	92.4%
	Other	7.6%

Rogers		0.0%
	Coburn	91.1%
	Other	8.9%

Seminole		0.0%
	Coburn	90.7%
	Other	9.3%

Sequoyah		0.0%
	Coburn	85.1%
	Other	14.9%

Stephens		0.0%
	Coburn	90.8%
	Other	9.2%

Texas		0.0%
	Coburn	84.1%
	Other	15.9%

Tillman		0.0%
	Coburn	91.1%
	Other	8.9%

Tulsa		0.0%
	Coburn	90.8%
	Other	9.2%

Wagoner		0.0%
	Coburn	91.3%
	Other	8.7%

Washington		0.0%
	Coburn	90.3%
	Other	9.7%

Washita		0.0%
	Coburn	90.2%
	Other	9.8%

Woods		0.0%
	Coburn	89.1%
	Other	10.9%

Woodward		0.0%
	Coburn	90.6%
	Other	9.4%

National DataGraph for 2010 - Oklahoma Results for 2010

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved