Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2013-02-14

Map

Map

Alamance	Daoud	10.5%
	Goodwin	34.5%
	Gardner	27.4%
	Other	27.6%

Alexander	Daoud	8.3%
	Goodwin	39.7%
	Gardner	35.9%
	Other	16.0%

Alleghany	Daoud	7.9%
	Goodwin	35.7%
	Gardner	32.3%
	Other	24.1%

Anson	Daoud	14.5%
	Goodwin	41.6%
	Gardner	28.3%
	Other	15.6%

Ashe	Daoud	7.5%
	Goodwin	33.1%
	Gardner	42.0%
	Other	17.3%

Avery	Daoud	10.1%
	Goodwin	37.5%
	Gardner	33.4%
	Other	19.0%

Beaufort	Daoud	6.5%
	Goodwin	45.6%
	Gardner	25.6%
	Other	22.4%

Bertie	Daoud	3.8%
	Goodwin	52.7%
	Gardner	25.8%
	Other	17.7%

Bladen	Daoud	7.4%
	Goodwin	41.6%
	Gardner	32.4%
	Other	18.7%

Brunswick	Daoud	12.1%
	Goodwin	36.8%
	Gardner	30.5%
	Other	20.6%

Buncombe	Daoud	9.7%
	Goodwin	32.0%
	Gardner	26.3%
	Other	32.0%

Burke	Daoud	11.5%
	Goodwin	36.8%
	Gardner	31.8%
	Other	19.8%

Cabarrus	Daoud	9.9%
	Goodwin	44.3%
	Gardner	27.2%
	Other	18.6%

Caldwell	Daoud	11.9%
	Goodwin	35.9%
	Gardner	32.5%
	Other	19.8%

Camden	Daoud	5.8%
	Goodwin	52.3%
	Gardner	22.1%
	Other	19.8%

Carteret	Daoud	4.2%
	Goodwin	28.1%
	Gardner	20.6%
	Other	47.0%

Caswell	Daoud	6.5%
	Goodwin	36.2%
	Gardner	31.7%
	Other	25.6%

Catawba	Daoud	10.9%
	Goodwin	33.9%
	Gardner	36.7%
	Other	18.4%

Chatham	Daoud	10.1%
	Goodwin	37.2%
	Gardner	31.3%
	Other	21.5%

Cherokee	Daoud	5.9%
	Goodwin	28.1%
	Gardner	28.7%
	Other	37.3%

Chowan	Daoud	2.7%
	Goodwin	79.3%
	Gardner	10.9%
	Other	7.1%

Clay	Daoud	6.8%
	Goodwin	35.6%
	Gardner	32.4%
	Other	25.1%

Cleveland	Daoud	5.9%
	Goodwin	31.4%
	Gardner	31.9%
	Other	30.8%

Columbus	Daoud	8.1%
	Goodwin	37.8%
	Gardner	35.5%
	Other	18.6%

Craven	Daoud	7.7%
	Goodwin	38.6%
	Gardner	28.5%
	Other	25.2%

Cumberland	Daoud	11.1%
	Goodwin	35.6%
	Gardner	30.0%
	Other	23.3%

Currituck	Daoud	6.9%
	Goodwin	53.9%
	Gardner	22.0%
	Other	17.2%

Dare	Daoud	9.9%
	Goodwin	43.2%
	Gardner	21.9%
	Other	24.9%

Davidson	Daoud	12.7%
	Goodwin	35.1%
	Gardner	29.4%
	Other	22.8%

Davie	Daoud	6.1%
	Goodwin	26.7%
	Gardner	40.9%
	Other	26.2%

Duplin	Daoud	6.5%
	Goodwin	54.1%
	Gardner	25.3%
	Other	14.2%

Durham	Daoud	9.9%
	Goodwin	35.1%
	Gardner	28.9%
	Other	26.1%

Edgecombe	Daoud	6.4%
	Goodwin	41.5%
	Gardner	30.4%
	Other	21.7%

Forsyth	Daoud	15.5%
	Goodwin	33.1%
	Gardner	28.1%
	Other	23.3%

Franklin	Daoud	6.4%
	Goodwin	32.6%
	Gardner	37.0%
	Other	24.0%

Gaston	Daoud	11.2%
	Goodwin	32.1%
	Gardner	32.6%
	Other	24.1%

Gates	Daoud	6.2%
	Goodwin	45.2%
	Gardner	32.0%
	Other	16.6%

Graham	Daoud	8.8%
	Goodwin	37.5%
	Gardner	28.6%
	Other	25.0%

Granville	Daoud	7.9%
	Goodwin	35.9%
	Gardner	31.3%
	Other	24.9%

Greene	Daoud	9.4%
	Goodwin	37.1%
	Gardner	32.5%
	Other	21.0%

Guilford	Daoud	9.9%
	Goodwin	33.3%
	Gardner	19.4%
	Other	37.3%

Halifax	Daoud	6.6%
	Goodwin	42.2%
	Gardner	28.6%
	Other	22.7%

Harnett	Daoud	8.3%
	Goodwin	32.8%
	Gardner	35.9%
	Other	22.9%

Haywood	Daoud	7.7%
	Goodwin	34.4%
	Gardner	29.9%
	Other	28.0%

Henderson	Daoud	13.7%
	Goodwin	29.6%
	Gardner	24.7%
	Other	31.9%

Hertford	Daoud	5.2%
	Goodwin	43.7%
	Gardner	26.4%
	Other	24.7%

Hoke	Daoud	10.7%
	Goodwin	36.9%
	Gardner	29.9%
	Other	22.5%

Hyde	Daoud	6.2%
	Goodwin	49.1%
	Gardner	26.7%
	Other	18.0%

Iredell	Daoud	11.8%
	Goodwin	36.0%
	Gardner	27.8%
	Other	24.4%

Jackson	Daoud	11.6%
	Goodwin	32.2%
	Gardner	34.6%
	Other	21.6%

Johnston	Daoud	10.2%
	Goodwin	33.3%
	Gardner	34.5%
	Other	22.0%

Jones	Daoud	7.4%
	Goodwin	39.4%
	Gardner	27.8%
	Other	25.5%

Lee	Daoud	7.2%
	Goodwin	51.3%
	Gardner	23.6%
	Other	17.9%

Lenoir	Daoud	7.8%
	Goodwin	36.3%
	Gardner	26.6%
	Other	29.3%

Lincoln	Daoud	7.4%
	Goodwin	31.4%
	Gardner	29.8%
	Other	31.5%

McDowell	Daoud	9.7%
	Goodwin	40.3%
	Gardner	31.0%
	Other	19.0%

Macon	Daoud	12.6%
	Goodwin	40.1%
	Gardner	27.1%
	Other	20.2%

Madison	Daoud	7.9%
	Goodwin	33.8%
	Gardner	29.3%
	Other	29.0%

Martin	Daoud	8.6%
	Goodwin	45.8%
	Gardner	28.5%
	Other	17.1%

Mecklenburg	Daoud	10.9%
	Goodwin	39.5%
	Gardner	25.2%
	Other	24.4%

Mitchell	Daoud	9.4%
	Goodwin	36.5%
	Gardner	34.1%
	Other	20.1%

Montgomery	Daoud	5.6%
	Goodwin	51.0%
	Gardner	29.4%
	Other	14.0%

Moore	Daoud	9.7%
	Goodwin	39.2%
	Gardner	26.5%
	Other	24.5%

Nash	Daoud	8.0%
	Goodwin	34.6%
	Gardner	34.3%
	Other	23.2%

New Hanover	Daoud	11.1%
	Goodwin	43.2%
	Gardner	22.7%
	Other	23.1%

Northampton	Daoud	7.4%
	Goodwin	44.8%
	Gardner	27.3%
	Other	20.6%

Onslow	Daoud	9.0%
	Goodwin	37.6%
	Gardner	31.4%
	Other	22.0%

Orange	Daoud	10.3%
	Goodwin	34.3%
	Gardner	23.8%
	Other	31.6%

Pamlico	Daoud	8.8%
	Goodwin	32.0%
	Gardner	33.4%
	Other	25.8%

Pasquotank	Daoud	5.4%
	Goodwin	51.0%
	Gardner	24.3%
	Other	19.3%

Pender	Daoud	11.8%
	Goodwin	37.6%
	Gardner	29.2%
	Other	21.4%

Perquimans	Daoud	8.5%
	Goodwin	51.0%
	Gardner	20.5%
	Other	20.0%

Person	Daoud	7.2%
	Goodwin	40.5%
	Gardner	32.5%
	Other	19.8%

Pitt	Daoud	8.0%
	Goodwin	39.7%
	Gardner	27.0%
	Other	25.3%

Polk	Daoud	9.5%
	Goodwin	26.2%
	Gardner	25.2%
	Other	39.1%

Randolph	Daoud	13.1%
	Goodwin	37.6%
	Gardner	29.5%
	Other	19.8%

Richmond	Daoud	5.6%
	Goodwin	40.1%
	Gardner	38.5%
	Other	15.7%

Robeson	Daoud	8.5%
	Goodwin	32.5%
	Gardner	34.8%
	Other	24.2%

Rockingham	Daoud	7.0%
	Goodwin	40.5%
	Gardner	28.9%
	Other	23.5%

Rowan	Daoud	11.4%
	Goodwin	36.0%
	Gardner	34.8%
	Other	17.9%

Rutherford	Daoud	7.8%
	Goodwin	33.0%
	Gardner	37.2%
	Other	22.0%

Sampson	Daoud	6.9%
	Goodwin	37.7%
	Gardner	34.9%
	Other	20.5%

Scotland	Daoud	9.1%
	Goodwin	35.3%
	Gardner	38.4%
	Other	17.2%

Stanly	Daoud	7.0%
	Goodwin	45.9%
	Gardner	31.0%
	Other	16.2%

Stokes	Daoud	10.6%
	Goodwin	36.2%
	Gardner	30.4%
	Other	22.8%

Surry	Daoud	18.9%
	Goodwin	34.0%
	Gardner	27.8%
	Other	19.2%

Swain	Daoud	6.9%
	Goodwin	35.6%
	Gardner	36.3%
	Other	21.2%

Transylvania	Daoud	9.0%
	Goodwin	30.7%
	Gardner	29.8%
	Other	30.5%

Tyrrell	Daoud	7.4%
	Goodwin	49.1%
	Gardner	20.4%
	Other	23.1%

Union	Daoud	8.8%
	Goodwin	50.9%
	Gardner	23.3%
	Other	17.0%

Vance	Daoud	5.9%
	Goodwin	38.9%
	Gardner	32.4%
	Other	22.8%

Wake	Daoud	9.6%
	Goodwin	28.4%
	Gardner	38.0%
	Other	24.1%

Warren	Daoud	9.6%
	Goodwin	35.7%
	Gardner	28.1%
	Other	26.6%

Washington	Daoud	6.3%
	Goodwin	52.3%
	Gardner	25.6%
	Other	15.8%

Watauga	Daoud	18.2%
	Goodwin	35.1%
	Gardner	26.7%
	Other	20.1%

Wayne	Daoud	8.2%
	Goodwin	34.1%
	Gardner	33.1%
	Other	24.6%

Wilkes	Daoud	7.1%
	Goodwin	39.3%
	Gardner	33.9%
	Other	19.7%

Wilson	Daoud	8.8%
	Goodwin	33.3%
	Gardner	32.1%
	Other	25.9%

Yadkin	Daoud	9.6%
	Goodwin	35.6%
	Gardner	38.2%
	Other	16.6%

Yancey	Daoud	7.0%
	Goodwin	31.5%
	Gardner	34.0%
	Other	27.5%

National DataGraph for 2012 - North Carolina Results for 2012

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved