Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2012-02-29

Map

Map

Alcona	Nicholson	53.0%
	Romney	47.0%

Alger	Nicholson	48.9%
	Romney	51.1%

Allegan	Nicholson	38.4%
	Romney	61.5%
	Other	0.1%

Alpena	Nicholson	44.7%
	Romney	55.3%

Antrim	Nicholson	56.7%
	Romney	43.3%

Arenac	Nicholson	52.1%
	Romney	47.9%

Baraga	Nicholson	42.0%
	Romney	58.0%

Barry	Nicholson	52.1%
	Romney	47.8%
	Other	0.0%

Bay	Nicholson	50.6%
	Romney	49.4%
	Other	0.0%

Benzie	Nicholson	55.2%
	Romney	44.5%
	Other	0.3%

Berrien	Nicholson	42.9%
	Romney	57.0%
	Other	0.1%

Branch	Nicholson	53.8%
	Romney	46.1%
	Other	0.1%

Calhoun	Nicholson	59.4%
	Romney	40.5%
	Other	0.1%

Cass	Nicholson	47.5%
	Romney	52.5%

Charlevoix	Nicholson	53.7%
	Romney	46.3%

Cheboygan	Nicholson	53.0%
	Romney	47.0%

Chippewa	Nicholson	51.2%
	Romney	48.8%
	Other	0.1%

Clare	Nicholson	54.6%
	Romney	45.4%

Clinton	Nicholson	45.8%
	Romney	54.1%
	Other	0.1%

Crawford	Nicholson	54.9%
	Romney	45.1%

Delta	Nicholson	40.7%
	Romney	59.3%

Dickinson	Nicholson	53.8%
	Romney	45.2%
	Other	1.0%

Eaton	Nicholson	53.0%
	Romney	47.0%
	Other	0.0%

Emmet	Nicholson	52.2%
	Romney	47.8%

Genesee	Nicholson	47.8%
	Romney	52.2%

Gladwin	Nicholson	51.6%
	Romney	48.4%

Gogebic	Nicholson	34.0%
	Romney	66.0%

Grand Traverse	Nicholson	55.8%
	Romney	43.9%
	Other	0.3%

Gratiot	Nicholson	53.5%
	Romney	46.5%

Hillsdale	Nicholson	51.3%
	Romney	48.7%

Houghton	Nicholson	38.9%
	Romney	61.1%

Huron	Nicholson	47.0%
	Romney	53.0%

Ingham	Nicholson	50.7%
	Romney	49.3%

Ionia	Nicholson	44.9%
	Romney	55.1%

Iosco	Nicholson	53.8%
	Romney	46.2%

Iron	Nicholson	41.6%
	Romney	58.4%

Isabella	Nicholson	50.1%
	Romney	49.8%
	Other	0.0%

Jackson	Nicholson	49.6%
	Romney	50.4%

Kalamazoo	Nicholson	50.0%
	Romney	50.0%

Kalkaska	Nicholson	54.4%
	Romney	45.6%

Kent	Nicholson	40.7%
	Romney	59.2%
	Other	0.1%

Keweenaw	Nicholson	36.9%
	Romney	63.1%

Lake	Nicholson	56.4%
	Romney	43.6%

Lapeer	Nicholson	45.1%
	Romney	54.9%

Leelanau	Nicholson	56.8%
	Romney	43.2%
	Other	0.0%

Lenawee	Nicholson	37.8%
	Romney	62.2%

Livingston	Nicholson	48.6%
	Romney	51.4%

Luce	Nicholson	51.6%
	Romney	48.4%

Mackinac	Nicholson	51.6%
	Romney	48.4%

Macomb	Nicholson	46.3%
	Romney	53.7%
	Other	0.0%

Manistee	Nicholson	62.2%
	Romney	37.8%

Marquette	Nicholson	47.5%
	Romney	52.5%

Mason	Nicholson	54.1%
	Romney	45.9%

Mecosta	Nicholson	53.4%
	Romney	46.4%
	Other	0.1%

Menominee	Nicholson	40.9%
	Romney	59.1%

Midland	Nicholson	53.3%
	Romney	46.7%

Missaukee	Nicholson	44.3%
	Romney	55.7%

Monroe	Nicholson	39.3%
	Romney	60.7%

Montcalm	Nicholson	51.6%
	Romney	48.4%

Montmorency	Nicholson	48.2%
	Romney	51.8%

Muskegon	Nicholson	43.8%
	Romney	56.2%

Newaygo	Nicholson	43.6%
	Romney	56.2%
	Other	0.2%

Oakland	Nicholson	50.3%
	Romney	49.5%
	Other	0.2%

Oceana	Nicholson	46.9%
	Romney	53.1%

Ogemaw	Nicholson	50.6%
	Romney	49.3%
	Other	0.1%

Ontonagon	Nicholson	42.9%
	Romney	57.1%

Osceola	Nicholson	52.6%
	Romney	47.4%

Oscoda	Nicholson	48.1%
	Romney	51.9%

Otsego	Nicholson	53.0%
	Romney	47.0%

Ottawa	Nicholson	32.4%
	Romney	67.4%
	Other	0.2%

Presque Isle	Nicholson	54.0%
	Romney	46.0%

Roscommon	Nicholson	56.5%
	Romney	43.5%

Saginaw	Nicholson	51.6%
	Romney	48.3%
	Other	0.1%

St. Clair	Nicholson	51.4%
	Romney	48.6%

St. Joseph	Nicholson	47.0%
	Romney	53.0%
	Other	0.0%

Sanilac	Nicholson	46.9%
	Romney	53.0%
	Other	0.0%

Schoolcraft	Nicholson	39.8%
	Romney	59.9%
	Other	0.3%

Shiawassee	Nicholson	49.6%
	Romney	50.4%

Tuscola	Nicholson	44.8%
	Romney	55.2%

Van Buren	Nicholson	51.8%
	Romney	48.2%

Washtenaw	Nicholson	50.0%
	Romney	50.0%
	Other	0.0%

Wayne	Nicholson	45.8%
	Romney	54.2%
	Other	0.0%

Wexford	Nicholson	52.6%
	Romney	47.4%
	Other	0.1%

National DataGraph for 1996 - Michigan Results for 1996

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved