Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-07-11

Map

Map

Adair	Boren	83.1%
	Jenner	10.8%
	Other	6.1%

Alfalfa	Boren	90.6%
	Jenner	6.9%
	Other	2.4%

Atoka	Boren	84.9%
	Jenner	8.9%
	Other	6.2%

Beaver	Boren	78.7%
	Jenner	17.2%
	Other	4.2%

Beckham	Boren	86.4%
	Jenner	10.4%
	Other	3.1%

Blaine	Boren	86.2%
	Jenner	10.1%
	Other	3.8%

Bryan	Boren	86.8%
	Jenner	9.2%
	Other	3.9%

Caddo	Boren	85.4%
	Jenner	10.8%
	Other	3.8%

Canadian	Boren	84.0%
	Jenner	11.8%
	Other	4.1%

Carter	Boren	84.9%
	Jenner	10.7%
	Other	4.4%

Cherokee	Boren	82.6%
	Jenner	11.6%
	Other	5.8%

Choctaw	Boren	86.1%
	Jenner	10.8%
	Other	3.1%

Cimarron	Boren	78.9%
	Jenner	13.9%
	Other	7.2%

Cleveland	Boren	83.9%
	Jenner	12.1%
	Other	3.9%

Coal	Boren	76.0%
	Jenner	5.6%
	Other	18.3%

Comanche	Boren	78.7%
	Jenner	14.1%
	Other	7.2%

Cotton	Boren	80.1%
	Jenner	14.1%
	Other	5.9%

Craig	Boren	82.8%
	Jenner	12.0%
	Other	5.3%

Creek	Boren	82.8%
	Jenner	11.8%
	Other	5.3%

Custer	Boren	88.9%
	Jenner	8.7%
	Other	2.4%

Delaware	Boren	77.3%
	Jenner	14.2%
	Other	8.4%

Dewey	Boren	85.4%
	Jenner	11.0%
	Other	3.6%

Ellis	Boren	84.8%
	Jenner	11.5%
	Other	3.8%

Garfield	Boren	87.1%
	Jenner	10.1%
	Other	2.8%

Garvin	Boren	86.7%
	Jenner	9.6%
	Other	3.7%

Grady	Boren	83.1%
	Jenner	12.2%
	Other	4.8%

Grant	Boren	84.3%
	Jenner	13.2%
	Other	2.5%

Greer	Boren	86.2%
	Jenner	10.0%
	Other	3.7%

Harmon	Boren	88.5%
	Jenner	7.0%
	Other	4.6%

Harper	Boren	82.9%
	Jenner	14.4%
	Other	2.7%

Haskell	Boren	83.4%
	Jenner	11.4%
	Other	5.2%

Hughes	Boren	86.6%
	Jenner	8.0%
	Other	5.4%

Jackson	Boren	87.8%
	Jenner	8.4%
	Other	3.8%

Jefferson	Boren	82.5%
	Jenner	12.4%
	Other	5.1%

Johnston	Boren	86.8%
	Jenner	9.4%
	Other	3.8%

Kay	Boren	82.1%
	Jenner	13.8%
	Other	4.0%

Kingfisher	Boren	89.7%
	Jenner	7.5%
	Other	2.8%

Kiowa	Boren	86.0%
	Jenner	10.6%
	Other	3.4%

Latimer	Boren	80.5%
	Jenner	14.8%
	Other	4.7%

Le Flore	Boren	83.1%
	Jenner	12.5%
	Other	4.4%

Lincoln	Boren	84.6%
	Jenner	10.8%
	Other	4.7%

Logan	Boren	83.4%
	Jenner	11.7%
	Other	4.9%

Love	Boren	87.3%
	Jenner	9.0%
	Other	3.6%

McClain	Boren	84.8%
	Jenner	11.2%
	Other	4.0%

McCurtain	Boren	82.3%
	Jenner	12.5%
	Other	5.1%

McIntosh	Boren	83.4%
	Jenner	10.8%
	Other	5.7%

Major	Boren	89.1%
	Jenner	8.4%
	Other	2.5%

Marshall	Boren	87.5%
	Jenner	9.1%
	Other	3.4%

Mayes	Boren	83.8%
	Jenner	10.4%
	Other	5.9%

Murray	Boren	87.3%
	Jenner	9.4%
	Other	3.3%

Muskogee	Boren	84.1%
	Jenner	12.1%
	Other	3.8%

Noble	Boren	84.1%
	Jenner	12.4%
	Other	3.6%

Nowata	Boren	81.1%
	Jenner	13.6%
	Other	5.2%

Okfuskee	Boren	83.1%
	Jenner	10.4%
	Other	6.5%

Oklahoma	Boren	84.7%
	Jenner	11.4%
	Other	3.9%

Okmulgee	Boren	84.7%
	Jenner	9.1%
	Other	6.2%

Osage	Boren	84.6%
	Jenner	10.3%
	Other	5.0%

Ottawa	Boren	80.5%
	Jenner	14.7%
	Other	4.9%

Pawnee	Boren	82.2%
	Jenner	11.0%
	Other	6.7%

Payne	Boren	85.9%
	Jenner	10.2%
	Other	3.9%

Pittsburg	Boren	84.0%
	Jenner	11.3%
	Other	4.7%

Pontotoc	Boren	89.0%
	Jenner	6.7%
	Other	4.4%

Pottawatomie	Boren	86.2%
	Jenner	9.4%
	Other	4.4%

Pushmataha	Boren	84.1%
	Jenner	11.1%
	Other	4.8%

Roger Mills	Boren	84.3%
	Jenner	11.7%
	Other	3.9%

Rogers	Boren	84.0%
	Jenner	11.0%
	Other	5.1%

Seminole	Boren	89.5%
	Jenner	7.2%
	Other	3.3%

Sequoyah	Boren	81.3%
	Jenner	12.0%
	Other	6.7%

Stephens	Boren	80.9%
	Jenner	13.2%
	Other	5.9%

Texas	Boren	81.1%
	Jenner	13.1%
	Other	5.8%

Tillman	Boren	85.4%
	Jenner	9.1%
	Other	5.5%

Tulsa	Boren	84.5%
	Jenner	9.6%
	Other	5.9%

Wagoner	Boren	83.6%
	Jenner	10.2%
	Other	6.2%

Washington	Boren	83.6%
	Jenner	11.6%
	Other	4.8%

Washita	Boren	86.3%
	Jenner	10.7%
	Other	3.0%

Woods	Boren	88.3%
	Jenner	8.9%
	Other	2.7%

Woodward	Boren	87.3%
	Jenner	9.1%
	Other	3.5%

National DataGraph for 1990 - Oklahoma Results for 1990

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved