Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-03-25

Map

Map

Alamance	Coleman	52.3%
	Jones	27.0%
	Wilson	10.3%
	Other	10.4%

Alexander	Coleman	33.1%
	Jones	32.4%
	Wilson	16.9%
	Other	17.6%

Alleghany	Coleman	39.3%
	Jones	31.0%
	Wilson	16.8%
	Other	12.9%

Anson	Coleman	29.3%
	Jones	31.1%
	Wilson	29.1%
	Other	10.5%

Ashe	Coleman	30.4%
	Jones	44.7%
	Wilson	14.6%
	Other	10.3%

Avery	Coleman	36.4%
	Jones	45.2%
	Wilson	10.3%
	Other	8.1%

Beaufort	Coleman	46.3%
	Jones	31.6%
	Wilson	12.3%
	Other	9.8%

Bertie	Coleman	60.8%
	Jones	17.1%
	Wilson	13.2%
	Other	8.9%

Bladen	Coleman	26.2%
	Jones	13.8%
	Wilson	49.8%
	Other	10.2%

Brunswick	Coleman	45.9%
	Jones	32.2%
	Wilson	11.6%
	Other	10.2%

Buncombe	Coleman	18.0%
	Jones	70.9%
	Wilson	4.9%
	Other	6.3%

Burke	Coleman	38.8%
	Jones	33.4%
	Wilson	13.8%
	Other	14.0%

Cabarrus	Coleman	48.2%
	Jones	25.8%
	Wilson	10.5%
	Other	15.4%

Caldwell	Coleman	34.7%
	Jones	35.3%
	Wilson	16.4%
	Other	13.7%

Camden	Coleman	52.2%
	Jones	23.3%
	Wilson	15.1%
	Other	9.4%

Carteret	Coleman	38.6%
	Jones	40.7%
	Wilson	8.9%
	Other	11.8%

Caswell	Coleman	54.0%
	Jones	19.5%
	Wilson	13.6%
	Other	12.9%

Catawba	Coleman	37.4%
	Jones	32.7%
	Wilson	12.9%
	Other	17.0%

Chatham	Coleman	35.9%
	Jones	51.0%
	Wilson	7.2%
	Other	5.9%

Cherokee	Coleman	35.1%
	Jones	37.0%
	Wilson	14.0%
	Other	13.8%

Chowan	Coleman	53.7%
	Jones	20.7%
	Wilson	13.6%
	Other	12.0%

Clay	Coleman	43.4%
	Jones	35.3%
	Wilson	11.8%
	Other	9.6%

Cleveland	Coleman	47.1%
	Jones	25.9%
	Wilson	12.4%
	Other	14.5%

Columbus	Coleman	44.5%
	Jones	21.4%
	Wilson	17.0%
	Other	17.1%

Craven	Coleman	45.7%
	Jones	29.9%
	Wilson	15.4%
	Other	9.0%

Cumberland	Coleman	59.1%
	Jones	18.4%
	Wilson	12.4%
	Other	10.1%

Currituck	Coleman	42.7%
	Jones	33.8%
	Wilson	13.5%
	Other	10.0%

Dare	Coleman	43.1%
	Jones	36.6%
	Wilson	11.0%
	Other	9.2%

Davidson	Coleman	47.1%
	Jones	28.9%
	Wilson	10.8%
	Other	13.2%

Davie	Coleman	47.1%
	Jones	32.4%
	Wilson	9.2%
	Other	11.3%

Duplin	Coleman	49.7%
	Jones	25.7%
	Wilson	12.7%
	Other	11.9%

Durham	Coleman	72.2%
	Jones	18.6%
	Wilson	4.8%
	Other	4.3%

Edgecombe	Coleman	59.4%
	Jones	13.1%
	Wilson	17.2%
	Other	10.3%

Forsyth	Coleman	56.1%
	Jones	27.5%
	Wilson	8.4%
	Other	8.0%

Franklin	Coleman	66.2%
	Jones	17.6%
	Wilson	7.9%
	Other	8.2%

Gaston	Coleman	42.7%
	Jones	28.7%
	Wilson	13.7%
	Other	14.9%

Gates	Coleman	42.1%
	Jones	18.3%
	Wilson	28.6%
	Other	11.1%

Graham	Coleman	28.8%
	Jones	35.7%
	Wilson	21.2%
	Other	14.3%

Granville	Coleman	67.4%
	Jones	15.4%
	Wilson	8.5%
	Other	8.7%

Greene	Coleman	59.6%
	Jones	23.3%
	Wilson	7.5%
	Other	9.6%

Guilford	Coleman	57.9%
	Jones	24.4%
	Wilson	9.5%
	Other	8.2%

Halifax	Coleman	51.4%
	Jones	14.0%
	Wilson	26.6%
	Other	8.1%

Harnett	Coleman	56.6%
	Jones	22.9%
	Wilson	10.0%
	Other	10.4%

Haywood	Coleman	26.1%
	Jones	48.4%
	Wilson	13.0%
	Other	12.4%

Henderson	Coleman	34.1%
	Jones	49.2%
	Wilson	9.1%
	Other	7.7%

Hertford	Coleman	37.3%
	Jones	11.8%
	Wilson	16.0%
	Other	34.9%

Hoke	Coleman	55.6%
	Jones	14.3%
	Wilson	11.5%
	Other	18.5%

Hyde	Coleman	41.4%
	Jones	35.2%
	Wilson	13.3%
	Other	10.1%

Iredell	Coleman	41.5%
	Jones	31.3%
	Wilson	12.9%
	Other	14.3%

Jackson	Coleman	28.5%
	Jones	52.0%
	Wilson	10.6%
	Other	8.9%

Johnston	Coleman	54.5%
	Jones	24.8%
	Wilson	9.5%
	Other	11.2%

Jones	Coleman	38.7%
	Jones	26.6%
	Wilson	26.4%
	Other	8.4%

Lee	Coleman	51.9%
	Jones	25.6%
	Wilson	12.2%
	Other	10.3%

Lenoir	Coleman	57.8%
	Jones	21.2%
	Wilson	12.8%
	Other	8.2%

Lincoln	Coleman	38.1%
	Jones	31.5%
	Wilson	13.4%
	Other	17.1%

McDowell	Coleman	30.8%
	Jones	38.7%
	Wilson	16.8%
	Other	13.7%

Macon	Coleman	37.2%
	Jones	39.5%
	Wilson	12.3%
	Other	11.1%

Madison	Coleman	21.1%
	Jones	58.7%
	Wilson	10.7%
	Other	9.6%

Martin	Coleman	64.4%
	Jones	19.1%
	Wilson	8.7%
	Other	7.8%

Mecklenburg	Coleman	55.2%
	Jones	24.8%
	Wilson	10.8%
	Other	9.3%

Mitchell	Coleman	33.9%
	Jones	51.2%
	Wilson	8.2%
	Other	6.7%

Montgomery	Coleman	48.9%
	Jones	23.6%
	Wilson	11.2%
	Other	16.3%

Moore	Coleman	56.3%
	Jones	25.5%
	Wilson	8.5%
	Other	9.6%

Nash	Coleman	66.7%
	Jones	13.8%
	Wilson	8.3%
	Other	11.2%

New Hanover	Coleman	47.7%
	Jones	34.5%
	Wilson	8.6%
	Other	9.3%

Northampton	Coleman	77.1%
	Jones	10.7%
	Wilson	6.1%
	Other	6.1%

Onslow	Coleman	45.0%
	Jones	31.7%
	Wilson	12.7%
	Other	10.7%

Orange	Coleman	40.3%
	Jones	47.5%
	Wilson	5.0%
	Other	7.3%

Pamlico	Coleman	47.7%
	Jones	34.0%
	Wilson	9.0%
	Other	9.3%

Pasquotank	Coleman	55.9%
	Jones	22.1%
	Wilson	12.0%
	Other	10.0%

Pender	Coleman	45.3%
	Jones	28.3%
	Wilson	12.5%
	Other	13.9%

Perquimans	Coleman	33.0%
	Jones	21.6%
	Wilson	33.7%
	Other	11.6%

Person	Coleman	54.6%
	Jones	21.6%
	Wilson	12.9%
	Other	10.9%

Pitt	Coleman	52.0%
	Jones	24.6%
	Wilson	14.0%
	Other	9.3%

Polk	Coleman	30.7%
	Jones	52.5%
	Wilson	9.1%
	Other	7.7%

Randolph	Coleman	43.7%
	Jones	34.8%
	Wilson	10.1%
	Other	11.3%

Richmond	Coleman	36.3%
	Jones	23.4%
	Wilson	22.1%
	Other	18.2%

Robeson	Coleman	39.2%
	Jones	22.3%
	Wilson	21.0%
	Other	17.5%

Rockingham	Coleman	54.8%
	Jones	23.0%
	Wilson	12.8%
	Other	9.5%

Rowan	Coleman	45.5%
	Jones	25.3%
	Wilson	13.6%
	Other	15.6%

Rutherford	Coleman	36.9%
	Jones	33.0%
	Wilson	15.0%
	Other	15.1%

Sampson	Coleman	60.6%
	Jones	16.9%
	Wilson	11.9%
	Other	10.6%

Scotland	Coleman	45.9%
	Jones	19.2%
	Wilson	13.8%
	Other	21.1%

Stanly	Coleman	40.2%
	Jones	26.1%
	Wilson	16.4%
	Other	17.3%

Stokes	Coleman	45.1%
	Jones	31.0%
	Wilson	12.6%
	Other	11.3%

Surry	Coleman	42.1%
	Jones	33.8%
	Wilson	12.0%
	Other	12.0%

Swain	Coleman	30.5%
	Jones	40.7%
	Wilson	16.9%
	Other	12.0%

Transylvania	Coleman	31.3%
	Jones	48.6%
	Wilson	12.1%
	Other	8.0%

Tyrrell	Coleman	41.9%
	Jones	35.6%
	Wilson	10.5%
	Other	12.0%

Union	Coleman	44.2%
	Jones	28.8%
	Wilson	14.5%
	Other	12.4%

Vance	Coleman	73.0%
	Jones	11.4%
	Wilson	7.4%
	Other	8.3%

Wake	Coleman	60.3%
	Jones	26.8%
	Wilson	6.6%
	Other	6.2%

Warren	Coleman	78.2%
	Jones	10.3%
	Wilson	6.0%
	Other	5.5%

Washington	Coleman	65.5%
	Jones	17.0%
	Wilson	10.0%
	Other	7.5%

Watauga	Coleman	38.7%
	Jones	45.2%
	Wilson	8.5%
	Other	7.7%

Wayne	Coleman	51.0%
	Jones	17.6%
	Wilson	11.2%
	Other	20.2%

Wilkes	Coleman	40.4%
	Jones	34.8%
	Wilson	12.1%
	Other	12.7%

Wilson	Coleman	53.1%
	Jones	14.0%
	Wilson	20.0%
	Other	12.9%

Yadkin	Coleman	43.1%
	Jones	34.4%
	Wilson	11.0%
	Other	11.5%

Yancey	Coleman	21.2%
	Jones	53.5%
	Wilson	15.6%
	Other	9.7%

National DataGraph for 2016 - North Carolina Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved