Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2020-03-25

Map

Map

Aitkin	Franson	22.8%
	Garcia	22.8%
	Iverson	23.0%
	Other	31.4%

Anoka	Franson	22.7%
	Garcia	34.7%
	Iverson	17.2%
	Other	25.4%

Becker	Franson	17.3%
	Garcia	27.8%
	Iverson	21.0%
	Other	33.9%

Beltrami	Franson	12.7%
	Garcia	37.8%
	Iverson	21.6%
	Other	27.9%

Benton	Franson	19.7%
	Garcia	23.3%
	Iverson	23.9%
	Other	33.1%

Big Stone	Franson	21.2%
	Garcia	22.4%
	Iverson	29.9%
	Other	26.5%

Blue Earth	Franson	14.5%
	Garcia	34.2%
	Iverson	20.6%
	Other	30.7%

Brown	Franson	17.7%
	Garcia	21.5%
	Iverson	27.5%
	Other	33.3%

Carlton	Franson	16.8%
	Garcia	22.5%
	Iverson	16.0%
	Other	44.8%

Carver	Franson	19.7%
	Garcia	28.3%
	Iverson	18.3%
	Other	33.7%

Cass	Franson	20.1%
	Garcia	27.6%
	Iverson	20.1%
	Other	32.3%

Chippewa	Franson	22.1%
	Garcia	20.5%
	Iverson	26.3%
	Other	31.2%

Chisago	Franson	23.1%
	Garcia	30.2%
	Iverson	19.4%
	Other	27.2%

Clay	Franson	17.7%
	Garcia	29.2%
	Iverson	26.0%
	Other	27.1%

Clearwater	Franson	15.4%
	Garcia	28.5%
	Iverson	25.4%
	Other	30.7%

Cook	Franson	15.8%
	Garcia	33.0%
	Iverson	18.7%
	Other	32.5%

Cottonwood	Franson	20.7%
	Garcia	19.9%
	Iverson	26.5%
	Other	32.8%

Crow Wing	Franson	22.9%
	Garcia	28.4%
	Iverson	19.1%
	Other	29.6%

Dakota	Franson	18.9%
	Garcia	38.0%
	Iverson	16.0%
	Other	27.2%

Dodge	Franson	23.4%
	Garcia	25.5%
	Iverson	27.4%
	Other	23.6%

Douglas	Franson	23.4%
	Garcia	24.8%
	Iverson	23.2%
	Other	28.7%

Faribault	Franson	21.9%
	Garcia	23.5%
	Iverson	26.7%
	Other	27.9%

Fillmore	Franson	22.3%
	Garcia	22.0%
	Iverson	30.0%
	Other	25.7%

Freeborn	Franson	14.8%
	Garcia	24.3%
	Iverson	20.6%
	Other	40.3%

Goodhue	Franson	21.0%
	Garcia	29.3%
	Iverson	20.2%
	Other	29.5%

Grant	Franson	20.5%
	Garcia	25.4%
	Iverson	28.9%
	Other	25.2%

Hennepin	Franson	16.7%
	Garcia	50.2%
	Iverson	11.1%
	Other	22.0%

Houston	Franson	20.8%
	Garcia	29.8%
	Iverson	29.0%
	Other	20.5%

Hubbard	Franson	18.1%
	Garcia	30.5%
	Iverson	21.1%
	Other	30.3%

Isanti	Franson	23.0%
	Garcia	33.5%
	Iverson	17.4%
	Other	26.1%

Itasca	Franson	15.8%
	Garcia	21.8%
	Iverson	18.9%
	Other	43.5%

Jackson	Franson	23.3%
	Garcia	23.3%
	Iverson	26.1%
	Other	27.3%

Kanabec	Franson	24.2%
	Garcia	21.4%
	Iverson	20.1%
	Other	34.4%

Kandiyohi	Franson	21.4%
	Garcia	22.4%
	Iverson	23.4%
	Other	32.8%

Kittson	Franson	20.4%
	Garcia	19.0%
	Iverson	28.3%
	Other	32.3%

Koochiching	Franson	24.1%
	Garcia	20.7%
	Iverson	18.5%
	Other	36.8%

Lac Qui Parle	Franson	18.8%
	Garcia	19.5%
	Iverson	29.1%
	Other	32.7%

Lake	Franson	13.9%
	Garcia	23.2%
	Iverson	22.4%
	Other	40.5%

Lake of the Woods	Franson	19.9%
	Garcia	23.9%
	Iverson	29.5%
	Other	26.7%

Le Sueur	Franson	22.2%
	Garcia	24.7%
	Iverson	25.3%
	Other	27.8%

Lincoln	Franson	26.6%
	Garcia	18.8%
	Iverson	26.7%
	Other	27.8%

Lyon	Franson	21.4%
	Garcia	21.0%
	Iverson	24.8%
	Other	32.8%

McLeod	Franson	22.2%
	Garcia	22.2%
	Iverson	26.9%
	Other	28.7%

Mahnomen	Franson	20.9%
	Garcia	18.4%
	Iverson	30.8%
	Other	29.9%

Marshall	Franson	19.6%
	Garcia	19.7%
	Iverson	28.5%
	Other	32.1%

Martin	Franson	24.7%
	Garcia	21.2%
	Iverson	21.3%
	Other	32.7%

Meeker	Franson	21.9%
	Garcia	22.1%
	Iverson	24.2%
	Other	31.7%

Mille Lacs	Franson	25.6%
	Garcia	28.1%
	Iverson	21.9%
	Other	24.4%

Morrison	Franson	24.2%
	Garcia	23.0%
	Iverson	21.7%
	Other	31.0%

Mower	Franson	23.6%
	Garcia	25.7%
	Iverson	24.9%
	Other	25.9%

Murray	Franson	28.4%
	Garcia	18.2%
	Iverson	23.7%
	Other	29.7%

Nicollet	Franson	17.4%
	Garcia	33.7%
	Iverson	17.5%
	Other	31.4%

Nobles	Franson	26.4%
	Garcia	20.1%
	Iverson	27.8%
	Other	25.7%

Norman	Franson	19.9%
	Garcia	17.7%
	Iverson	31.1%
	Other	31.3%

Olmsted	Franson	18.1%
	Garcia	32.9%
	Iverson	18.7%
	Other	30.2%

Otter Tail	Franson	18.5%
	Garcia	27.6%
	Iverson	26.7%
	Other	27.1%

Pennington	Franson	21.0%
	Garcia	17.0%
	Iverson	25.1%
	Other	36.9%

Pine	Franson	24.6%
	Garcia	25.8%
	Iverson	19.9%
	Other	29.8%

Pipestone	Franson	25.0%
	Garcia	19.5%
	Iverson	29.0%
	Other	26.6%

Polk	Franson	17.3%
	Garcia	20.0%
	Iverson	25.4%
	Other	37.3%

Pope	Franson	21.4%
	Garcia	20.7%
	Iverson	24.2%
	Other	33.7%

Ramsey	Franson	14.0%
	Garcia	50.7%
	Iverson	12.7%
	Other	22.6%

Red Lake	Franson	20.5%
	Garcia	13.6%
	Iverson	28.8%
	Other	37.1%

Redwood	Franson	21.7%
	Garcia	20.6%
	Iverson	28.2%
	Other	29.6%

Renville	Franson	24.4%
	Garcia	18.4%
	Iverson	29.0%
	Other	28.3%

Rice	Franson	17.9%
	Garcia	32.6%
	Iverson	22.0%
	Other	27.4%

Rock	Franson	19.4%
	Garcia	33.7%
	Iverson	30.3%
	Other	16.6%

Roseau	Franson	20.3%
	Garcia	20.5%
	Iverson	35.5%
	Other	23.7%

St. Louis	Franson	11.5%
	Garcia	31.4%
	Iverson	15.9%
	Other	41.2%

Scott	Franson	20.5%
	Garcia	34.8%
	Iverson	17.6%
	Other	27.1%

Sherburne	Franson	20.8%
	Garcia	31.4%
	Iverson	19.1%
	Other	28.7%

Sibley	Franson	22.9%
	Garcia	18.5%
	Iverson	25.1%
	Other	33.5%

Stearns	Franson	20.9%
	Garcia	27.9%
	Iverson	21.0%
	Other	30.2%

Steele	Franson	20.8%
	Garcia	27.4%
	Iverson	21.0%
	Other	30.8%

Stevens	Franson	20.5%
	Garcia	32.6%
	Iverson	20.2%
	Other	26.7%

Swift	Franson	23.3%
	Garcia	19.1%
	Iverson	28.1%
	Other	29.5%

Todd	Franson	22.0%
	Garcia	22.5%
	Iverson	25.0%
	Other	30.5%

Traverse	Franson	23.2%
	Garcia	25.4%
	Iverson	28.4%
	Other	23.0%

Wabasha	Franson	19.5%
	Garcia	27.4%
	Iverson	22.4%
	Other	30.7%

Wadena	Franson	20.7%
	Garcia	27.6%
	Iverson	22.7%
	Other	29.0%

Waseca	Franson	19.6%
	Garcia	19.8%
	Iverson	32.1%
	Other	28.4%

Washington	Franson	24.0%
	Garcia	36.8%
	Iverson	14.6%
	Other	24.7%

Watonwan	Franson	19.6%
	Garcia	19.0%
	Iverson	26.5%
	Other	34.8%

Wilkin	Franson	18.3%
	Garcia	18.0%
	Iverson	29.8%
	Other	33.9%

Winona	Franson	23.4%
	Garcia	28.3%
	Iverson	21.9%
	Other	26.5%

Wright	Franson	21.9%
	Garcia	28.3%
	Iverson	17.1%
	Other	32.7%

Yellow Medicine	Franson	19.6%
	Garcia	24.7%
	Iverson	29.1%
	Other	26.6%

National DataGraph for 1998 - Minnesota Results for 1998

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved