Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2020-03-23

Map

Map

Aitkin	Moe	83.9%
	Savior	16.1%

Anoka	Moe	84.3%
	Savior	15.7%

Becker	Moe	87.6%
	Savior	12.4%

Beltrami	Moe	91.7%
	Savior	8.3%

Benton	Moe	81.4%
	Savior	18.6%

Big Stone	Moe	91.5%
	Savior	8.5%

Blue Earth	Moe	83.6%
	Savior	16.4%

Brown	Moe	92.1%
	Savior	7.9%

Carlton	Moe	88.5%
	Savior	11.5%

Carver	Moe	86.6%
	Savior	13.4%

Cass	Moe	87.4%
	Savior	12.6%

Chippewa	Moe	88.0%
	Savior	12.0%

Chisago	Moe	82.8%
	Savior	17.2%

Clay	Moe	91.7%
	Savior	8.3%

Clearwater	Moe	85.9%
	Savior	14.1%

Cook	Moe	83.0%
	Savior	17.0%

Cottonwood	Moe	89.5%
	Savior	10.5%

Crow Wing	Moe	88.8%
	Savior	11.2%

Dakota	Moe	89.3%
	Savior	10.7%

Dodge	Moe	85.9%
	Savior	14.1%

Douglas	Moe	86.9%
	Savior	13.1%

Faribault	Moe	89.2%
	Savior	10.8%

Fillmore	Moe	88.3%
	Savior	11.7%

Freeborn	Moe	86.3%
	Savior	13.7%

Goodhue	Moe	89.0%
	Savior	11.0%

Grant	Moe	84.8%
	Savior	15.2%

Hennepin	Moe	92.0%
	Savior	8.0%

Houston	Moe	86.6%
	Savior	13.4%

Hubbard	Moe	88.7%
	Savior	11.3%

Isanti	Moe	85.6%
	Savior	14.4%

Itasca	Moe	86.0%
	Savior	14.0%

Jackson	Moe	90.4%
	Savior	9.6%

Kanabec	Moe	83.7%
	Savior	16.3%

Kandiyohi	Moe	92.0%
	Savior	8.0%

Kittson	Moe	94.2%
	Savior	5.8%

Koochiching	Moe	87.0%
	Savior	13.0%

Lac Qui Parle	Moe	89.5%
	Savior	10.5%

Lake	Moe	83.8%
	Savior	16.2%

Lake of the Woods	Moe	83.7%
	Savior	16.3%

Le Sueur	Moe	87.3%
	Savior	12.7%

Lincoln	Moe	90.5%
	Savior	9.5%

Lyon	Moe	91.3%
	Savior	8.7%

McLeod	Moe	87.7%
	Savior	12.3%

Mahnomen	Moe	77.4%
	Savior	22.6%

Marshall	Moe	88.3%
	Savior	11.7%

Martin	Moe	90.4%
	Savior	9.6%

Meeker	Moe	85.0%
	Savior	15.0%

Mille Lacs	Moe	81.8%
	Savior	18.2%

Morrison	Moe	85.2%
	Savior	14.8%

Mower	Moe	87.8%
	Savior	12.2%

Murray	Moe	89.6%
	Savior	10.4%

Nicollet	Moe	84.6%
	Savior	15.4%

Nobles	Moe	88.8%
	Savior	11.3%

Norman	Moe	88.9%
	Savior	11.1%

Olmsted	Moe	88.4%
	Savior	11.6%

Otter Tail	Moe	88.9%
	Savior	11.1%

Pennington	Moe	88.4%
	Savior	11.6%

Pine	Moe	84.2%
	Savior	15.8%

Pipestone	Moe	88.3%
	Savior	11.7%

Polk	Moe	90.1%
	Savior	9.9%

Pope	Moe	86.9%
	Savior	13.1%

Ramsey	Moe	90.5%
	Savior	9.5%

Red Lake	Moe	89.4%
	Savior	10.6%

Redwood	Moe	90.3%
	Savior	9.7%

Renville	Moe	89.7%
	Savior	10.3%

Rice	Moe	89.1%
	Savior	10.9%

Rock	Moe	90.2%
	Savior	9.8%

Roseau	Moe	89.8%
	Savior	10.2%

St. Louis	Moe	89.6%
	Savior	10.4%

Scott	Moe	85.2%
	Savior	14.8%

Sherburne	Moe	84.2%
	Savior	15.8%

Sibley	Moe	86.2%
	Savior	13.8%

Stearns	Moe	87.0%
	Savior	13.0%

Steele	Moe	86.2%
	Savior	13.8%

Stevens	Moe	86.1%
	Savior	13.9%

Swift	Moe	90.2%
	Savior	9.8%

Todd	Moe	86.1%
	Savior	13.9%

Traverse	Moe	88.5%
	Savior	11.5%

Wabasha	Moe	87.0%
	Savior	13.0%

Wadena	Moe	86.0%
	Savior	14.0%

Waseca	Moe	78.5%
	Savior	21.5%

Washington	Moe	89.2%
	Savior	10.8%

Watonwan	Moe	85.6%
	Savior	14.4%

Wilkin	Moe	86.5%
	Savior	13.5%

Winona	Moe	88.7%
	Savior	11.3%

Wright	Moe	87.2%
	Savior	12.8%

Yellow Medicine	Moe	89.1%
	Savior	10.9%

National DataGraph for 2002 - Minnesota Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved