2002 Secretary of State Democratic Primary Election Data Graphs - Alabama
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2009-02-07

Map

AutaugaWorley59.3%
 
Pitts22.7%
 
Segrest17.9%
 


BaldwinWorley60.1%
 
Pitts22.9%
 
Segrest17.0%
 


BarbourWorley46.4%
 
Pitts36.1%
 
Segrest17.5%
 


BibbWorley49.5%
 
Pitts31.5%
 
Segrest18.9%
 


BlountWorley59.4%
 
Pitts20.6%
 
Segrest20.0%
 


BullockWorley27.4%
 
Pitts42.0%
 
Segrest30.6%
 


ButlerWorley57.1%
 
Pitts22.3%
 
Segrest20.6%
 


CalhounWorley52.4%
 
Pitts30.4%
 
Segrest17.2%
 


ChambersWorley41.4%
 
Pitts24.9%
 
Segrest33.7%
 


CherokeeWorley58.1%
 
Pitts22.0%
 
Segrest19.9%
 


ChiltonWorley51.4%
 
Pitts32.0%
 
Segrest16.6%
 


ChoctawWorley43.5%
 
Pitts35.2%
 
Segrest21.4%
 


ClarkeWorley57.6%
 
Pitts27.9%
 
Segrest14.5%
 


ClayWorley53.0%
 
Pitts26.8%
 
Segrest20.2%
 


CleburneWorley51.9%
 
Pitts24.0%
 
Segrest24.1%
 


CoffeeWorley54.9%
 
Pitts21.1%
 
Segrest24.1%
 


ColbertWorley58.0%
 
Pitts27.5%
 
Segrest14.5%
 


ConecuhWorley60.1%
 
Pitts21.7%
 
Segrest18.3%
 


CoosaWorley46.0%
 
Pitts26.4%
 
Segrest27.6%
 


CovingtonWorley59.6%
 
Pitts19.7%
 
Segrest20.6%
 


CrenshawWorley56.3%
 
Pitts18.9%
 
Segrest24.9%
 


CullmanWorley60.5%
 
Pitts19.2%
 
Segrest20.3%
 


DaleWorley53.2%
 
Pitts22.4%
 
Segrest24.3%
 


DallasWorley34.4%
 
Pitts52.1%
 
Segrest13.5%
 


DeKalbWorley54.6%
 
Pitts25.7%
 
Segrest19.7%
 


ElmoreWorley53.2%
 
Pitts23.3%
 
Segrest23.5%
 


EscambiaWorley59.6%
 
Pitts20.7%
 
Segrest19.7%
 


EtowahWorley52.6%
 
Pitts35.0%
 
Segrest12.3%
 


FayetteWorley53.5%
 
Pitts19.3%
 
Segrest27.2%
 


FranklinWorley56.7%
 
Pitts21.9%
 
Segrest21.4%
 


GenevaWorley52.4%
 
Pitts14.3%
 
Segrest33.2%
 


GreeneWorley30.2%
 
Pitts56.1%
 
Segrest13.7%
 


HaleWorley32.8%
 
Pitts55.6%
 
Segrest11.6%
 


HenryWorley41.0%
 
Pitts36.4%
 
Segrest22.6%
 


HoustonWorley48.1%
 
Pitts23.9%
 
Segrest28.0%
 


JacksonWorley68.0%
 
Pitts16.0%
 
Segrest16.0%
 


JeffersonWorley39.1%
 
Pitts51.1%
 
Segrest9.7%
 


LamarWorley54.8%
 
Pitts23.9%
 
Segrest21.3%
 


LauderdaleWorley61.9%
 
Pitts22.8%
 
Segrest15.3%
 


LawrenceWorley56.9%
 
Pitts22.2%
 
Segrest20.9%
 


LeeWorley35.7%
 
Pitts52.7%
 
Segrest11.6%
 


LimestoneWorley58.4%
 
Pitts15.7%
 
Segrest25.9%
 


LowndesWorley37.6%
 
Pitts44.7%
 
Segrest17.7%
 


MaconWorley26.4%
 
Pitts48.4%
 
Segrest25.2%
 


MadisonWorley59.1%
 
Pitts25.5%
 
Segrest15.4%
 


MarengoWorley44.3%
 
Pitts37.8%
 
Segrest17.9%
 


MarionWorley53.6%
 
Pitts21.0%
 
Segrest25.4%
 


MarshallWorley62.6%
 
Pitts16.7%
 
Segrest20.7%
 


MobileWorley42.3%
 
Pitts43.2%
 
Segrest14.5%
 


MonroeWorley54.9%
 
Pitts29.9%
 
Segrest15.1%
 


MontgomeryWorley45.4%
 
Pitts41.8%
 
Segrest12.8%
 


MorganWorley72.0%
 
Pitts14.6%
 
Segrest13.4%
 


PerryWorley30.6%
 
Pitts59.9%
 
Segrest9.5%
 


PickensWorley37.3%
 
Pitts40.2%
 
Segrest22.5%
 


PikeWorley43.8%
 
Pitts37.0%
 
Segrest19.2%
 


RandolphWorley39.3%
 
Pitts24.2%
 
Segrest36.5%
 


RussellWorley52.7%
 
Pitts28.6%
 
Segrest18.6%
 


St. ClairWorley55.7%
 
Pitts24.1%
 
Segrest20.3%
 


ShelbyWorley57.0%
 
Pitts26.1%
 
Segrest16.8%
 


SumterWorley33.7%
 
Pitts51.7%
 
Segrest14.6%
 


TalladegaWorley51.2%
 
Pitts32.4%
 
Segrest16.4%
 


TallapoosaWorley46.1%
 
Pitts21.5%
 
Segrest32.4%
 


TuscaloosaWorley48.4%
 
Pitts36.0%
 
Segrest15.6%
 


WalkerWorley53.5%
 
Pitts22.3%
 
Segrest24.2%
 


WashingtonWorley42.5%
 
Pitts37.7%
 
Segrest19.8%
 


WilcoxWorley37.2%
 
Pitts50.4%
 
Segrest12.4%
 


WinstonWorley59.0%
 
Pitts17.6%
 
Segrest23.4%
 



National DataGraph for 2002 - Alabama Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved