Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-02-04

Map

Map

Autauga	Shelby	68.5%
	McNair	14.5%
	Other	17.0%

Baldwin	Shelby	57.1%
	McNair	21.7%
	Other	21.2%

Barbour	Shelby	70.8%
	McNair	14.3%
	Other	14.9%

Bibb	Shelby	74.6%
	McNair	17.5%
	Other	7.9%

Blount	Shelby	68.3%
	McNair	19.4%
	Other	12.3%

Bullock	Shelby	68.4%
	McNair	20.1%
	Other	11.5%

Butler	Shelby	77.4%
	McNair	12.9%
	Other	9.7%

Calhoun	Shelby	49.6%
	McNair	35.6%
	Other	14.8%

Chambers	Shelby	65.7%
	McNair	18.6%
	Other	15.7%

Cherokee	Shelby	63.8%
	McNair	14.6%
	Other	21.6%

Chilton	Shelby	69.2%
	McNair	23.1%
	Other	7.7%

Choctaw	Shelby	70.6%
	McNair	21.3%
	Other	8.1%

Clarke	Shelby	64.4%
	McNair	18.7%
	Other	16.9%

Clay	Shelby	69.9%
	McNair	13.6%
	Other	16.5%

Cleburne	Shelby	65.6%
	McNair	16.6%
	Other	17.8%

Coffee	Shelby	72.2%
	McNair	13.9%
	Other	13.9%

Colbert	Shelby	72.5%
	McNair	16.8%
	Other	10.7%

Conecuh	Shelby	72.3%
	McNair	18.0%
	Other	9.6%

Coosa	Shelby	64.6%
	McNair	25.6%
	Other	9.8%

Covington	Shelby	78.1%
	McNair	9.1%
	Other	12.8%

Crenshaw	Shelby	73.7%
	McNair	17.8%
	Other	8.5%

Cullman	Shelby	66.1%
	McNair	17.3%
	Other	16.6%

Dale	Shelby	69.7%
	McNair	13.9%
	Other	16.4%

Dallas	Shelby	63.7%
	McNair	25.2%
	Other	11.0%

DeKalb	Shelby	73.7%
	McNair	10.1%
	Other	16.2%

Elmore	Shelby	67.4%
	McNair	16.2%
	Other	16.5%

Escambia	Shelby	68.0%
	McNair	15.0%
	Other	17.0%

Etowah	Shelby	67.8%
	McNair	20.2%
	Other	12.0%

Fayette	Shelby	70.5%
	McNair	16.4%
	Other	13.1%

Franklin	Shelby	74.5%
	McNair	11.3%
	Other	14.3%

Geneva	Shelby	78.3%
	McNair	8.9%
	Other	12.8%

Greene	Shelby	81.8%
	McNair	14.5%
	Other	3.8%

Hale	Shelby	62.0%
	McNair	28.0%
	Other	10.0%

Henry	Shelby	79.0%
	McNair	10.8%
	Other	10.2%

Houston	Shelby	74.1%
	McNair	12.0%
	Other	13.9%

Jackson	Shelby	71.6%
	McNair	11.7%
	Other	16.7%

Jefferson	Shelby	38.6%
	McNair	57.8%
	Other	3.7%

Lamar	Shelby	74.9%
	McNair	8.6%
	Other	16.4%

Lauderdale	Shelby	71.8%
	McNair	16.2%
	Other	12.0%

Lawrence	Shelby	69.4%
	McNair	20.4%
	Other	10.2%

Lee	Shelby	49.8%
	McNair	32.2%
	Other	18.0%

Limestone	Shelby	71.7%
	McNair	15.3%
	Other	13.0%

Lowndes	Shelby	64.1%
	McNair	24.3%
	Other	11.6%

Macon	Shelby	46.4%
	McNair	36.6%
	Other	17.0%

Madison	Shelby	60.1%
	McNair	28.0%
	Other	11.9%

Marengo	Shelby	66.1%
	McNair	24.9%
	Other	9.0%

Marion	Shelby	72.1%
	McNair	11.0%
	Other	16.9%

Marshall	Shelby	65.7%
	McNair	17.3%
	Other	16.9%

Mobile	Shelby	61.6%
	McNair	27.0%
	Other	11.4%

Monroe	Shelby	64.4%
	McNair	26.9%
	Other	8.8%

Montgomery	Shelby	67.5%
	McNair	23.3%
	Other	9.3%

Morgan	Shelby	66.9%
	McNair	16.7%
	Other	16.5%

Perry	Shelby	78.0%
	McNair	14.2%
	Other	7.8%

Pickens	Shelby	74.4%
	McNair	14.1%
	Other	11.5%

Pike	Shelby	77.5%
	McNair	10.9%
	Other	11.6%

Randolph	Shelby	62.5%
	McNair	16.6%
	Other	21.0%

Russell	Shelby	61.6%
	McNair	15.9%
	Other	22.5%

St. Clair	Shelby	52.3%
	McNair	41.8%
	Other	5.9%

Shelby	Shelby	63.4%
	McNair	26.5%
	Other	10.0%

Sumter	Shelby	47.0%
	McNair	47.3%
	Other	5.7%

Talladega	Shelby	48.3%
	McNair	37.6%
	Other	14.2%

Tallapoosa	Shelby	60.9%
	McNair	20.8%
	Other	18.2%

Tuscaloosa	Shelby	70.9%
	McNair	21.4%
	Other	7.7%

Walker	Shelby	65.8%
	McNair	17.4%
	Other	16.8%

Washington	Shelby	71.8%
	McNair	15.7%
	Other	12.5%

Wilcox	Shelby	62.5%
	McNair	26.2%
	Other	11.2%

Winston	Shelby	73.6%
	McNair	12.7%
	Other	13.7%

National DataGraph for 1992 - Alabama Results for 1992

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved