2002 Agriculture Commissioner Democratic Primary Election Data Graphs - Alabama
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-12-22

Map

AutaugaSparks40.1%
 
Mathis49.0%
 
Warhurst10.9%
 


BaldwinSparks39.9%
 
Mathis44.0%
 
Warhurst16.0%
 


BarbourSparks34.1%
 
Mathis51.2%
 
Warhurst14.7%
 


BibbSparks60.8%
 
Mathis31.0%
 
Warhurst8.3%
 


BlountSparks59.1%
 
Mathis24.7%
 
Warhurst16.2%
 


BullockSparks60.7%
 
Mathis29.0%
 
Warhurst10.3%
 


ButlerSparks47.5%
 
Mathis42.4%
 
Warhurst10.1%
 


CalhounSparks59.9%
 
Mathis26.8%
 
Warhurst13.3%
 


ChambersSparks53.5%
 
Mathis36.2%
 
Warhurst10.3%
 


CherokeeSparks66.8%
 
Mathis23.5%
 
Warhurst9.8%
 


ChiltonSparks53.7%
 
Mathis36.8%
 
Warhurst9.6%
 


ChoctawSparks50.5%
 
Mathis29.1%
 
Warhurst20.5%
 


ClarkeSparks37.8%
 
Mathis46.5%
 
Warhurst15.7%
 


ClaySparks52.5%
 
Mathis36.5%
 
Warhurst11.1%
 


CleburneSparks54.7%
 
Mathis29.6%
 
Warhurst15.7%
 


CoffeeSparks31.8%
 
Mathis60.6%
 
Warhurst7.6%
 


ColbertSparks31.2%
 
Mathis26.8%
 
Warhurst42.0%
 


ConecuhSparks48.3%
 
Mathis41.1%
 
Warhurst10.6%
 


CoosaSparks49.7%
 
Mathis36.1%
 
Warhurst14.2%
 


CovingtonSparks50.0%
 
Mathis41.0%
 
Warhurst9.1%
 


CrenshawSparks47.8%
 
Mathis39.9%
 
Warhurst12.4%
 


CullmanSparks60.5%
 
Mathis21.4%
 
Warhurst18.1%
 


DaleSparks24.0%
 
Mathis68.3%
 
Warhurst7.7%
 


DallasSparks59.7%
 
Mathis32.7%
 
Warhurst7.6%
 


DeKalbSparks73.5%
 
Mathis18.3%
 
Warhurst8.2%
 


ElmoreSparks48.4%
 
Mathis40.8%
 
Warhurst10.8%
 


EscambiaSparks45.5%
 
Mathis40.2%
 
Warhurst14.3%
 


EtowahSparks56.0%
 
Mathis33.2%
 
Warhurst10.8%
 


FayetteSparks51.5%
 
Mathis25.0%
 
Warhurst23.6%
 


FranklinSparks28.4%
 
Mathis6.5%
 
Warhurst65.1%
 


GenevaSparks21.8%
 
Mathis73.8%
 
Warhurst4.3%
 


GreeneSparks67.9%
 
Mathis24.4%
 
Warhurst7.7%
 


HaleSparks74.7%
 
Mathis13.6%
 
Warhurst11.7%
 


HenrySparks26.8%
 
Mathis63.1%
 
Warhurst10.1%
 


HoustonSparks24.3%
 
Mathis70.4%
 
Warhurst5.3%
 


JacksonSparks66.7%
 
Mathis19.8%
 
Warhurst13.5%
 


JeffersonSparks51.9%
 
Mathis38.9%
 
Warhurst9.2%
 


LamarSparks53.9%
 
Mathis23.9%
 
Warhurst22.2%
 


LauderdaleSparks44.5%
 
Mathis23.0%
 
Warhurst32.6%
 


LawrenceSparks47.6%
 
Mathis21.6%
 
Warhurst30.8%
 


LeeSparks53.7%
 
Mathis37.3%
 
Warhurst9.0%
 


LimestoneSparks56.1%
 
Mathis23.6%
 
Warhurst20.2%
 


LowndesSparks46.0%
 
Mathis41.8%
 
Warhurst12.2%
 


MaconSparks40.5%
 
Mathis51.5%
 
Warhurst8.0%
 


MadisonSparks54.3%
 
Mathis32.1%
 
Warhurst13.6%
 


MarengoSparks29.9%
 
Mathis36.7%
 
Warhurst33.4%
 


MarionSparks49.1%
 
Mathis18.4%
 
Warhurst32.4%
 


MarshallSparks62.1%
 
Mathis26.0%
 
Warhurst11.9%
 


MobileSparks45.2%
 
Mathis40.9%
 
Warhurst13.9%
 


MonroeSparks42.5%
 
Mathis48.1%
 
Warhurst9.4%
 


MontgomerySparks46.6%
 
Mathis44.7%
 
Warhurst8.7%
 


MorganSparks60.8%
 
Mathis26.7%
 
Warhurst12.5%
 


PerrySparks71.6%
 
Mathis21.1%
 
Warhurst7.3%
 


PickensSparks62.8%
 
Mathis23.0%
 
Warhurst14.2%
 


PikeSparks41.9%
 
Mathis46.8%
 
Warhurst11.3%
 


RandolphSparks69.1%
 
Mathis21.4%
 
Warhurst9.6%
 


RussellSparks49.8%
 
Mathis41.9%
 
Warhurst8.3%
 


St. ClairSparks54.3%
 
Mathis34.2%
 
Warhurst11.5%
 


ShelbySparks56.4%
 
Mathis31.4%
 
Warhurst12.1%
 


SumterSparks59.3%
 
Mathis25.3%
 
Warhurst15.4%
 


TalladegaSparks58.0%
 
Mathis32.3%
 
Warhurst9.6%
 


TallapoosaSparks57.5%
 
Mathis34.8%
 
Warhurst7.7%
 


TuscaloosaSparks60.6%
 
Mathis28.2%
 
Warhurst11.2%
 


WalkerSparks62.4%
 
Mathis24.6%
 
Warhurst13.0%
 


WashingtonSparks45.3%
 
Mathis40.0%
 
Warhurst14.7%
 


WilcoxSparks59.4%
 
Mathis31.7%
 
Warhurst8.9%
 


WinstonSparks47.4%
 
Mathis18.9%
 
Warhurst33.7%
 



National DataGraph for 2002 - Alabama Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved