Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Anderson	Clinton	75.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	22.7%
	Other	1.7%

Andrews	Clinton	66.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.0%
	Other	0.9%

Angelina	Clinton	73.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	23.5%
	Other	2.8%

Aransas	Clinton	63.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.1%
	Other	1.8%

Archer	Clinton	58.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.1%
	Other	3.0%

Armstrong	Clinton	20.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	80.0%

Atascosa	Clinton	71.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.3%
	Other	3.0%

Austin	Clinton	73.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	24.6%
	Other	1.9%

Bailey	Clinton	71.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	24.6%
	Other	4.2%

Bandera	Clinton	55.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.1%
	Other	1.5%

Bastrop	Clinton	59.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.7%
	Other	1.2%

Baylor	Clinton	61.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.0%
	Other	6.7%

Bee	Clinton	75.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	21.2%
	Other	3.7%

Bell	Clinton	69.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.1%
	Other	1.0%

Bexar	Clinton	66.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.1%
	Other	1.1%

Blanco	Clinton	54.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.9%
	Other	0.2%

Borden	Clinton	80.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	20.0%

Bosque	Clinton	62.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.3%
	Other	2.1%

Bowie	Clinton	76.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	21.6%
	Other	1.7%

Brazoria	Clinton	69.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	28.8%
	Other	1.6%

Brazos	Clinton	49.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	49.5%
	Other	1.5%

Brewster	Clinton	43.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	48.1%
	Other	8.2%

Briscoe	Clinton	57.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.3%
	Other	3.6%

Brooks	Clinton	74.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	16.8%
	Other	8.9%

Brown	Clinton	58.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.9%
	Other	2.6%

Burleson	Clinton	74.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	23.5%
	Other	2.5%

Burnet	Clinton	59.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.3%
	Other	1.3%

Caldwell	Clinton	66.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.8%
	Other	2.1%

Calhoun	Clinton	66.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	28.6%
	Other	4.8%

Callahan	Clinton	44.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	52.8%
	Other	3.0%

Cameron	Clinton	68.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.9%
	Other	3.9%

Camp	Clinton	76.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	21.2%
	Other	2.2%

Carson	Clinton	62.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.5%

Cass	Clinton	73.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	24.9%
	Other	2.1%

Castro	Clinton	73.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	23.3%
	Other	2.9%

Chambers	Clinton	67.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.1%
	Other	3.1%

Cherokee	Clinton	74.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	24.3%
	Other	1.6%

Childress	Clinton	58.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.0%
	Other	4.3%

Clay	Clinton	62.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.9%
	Other	3.6%

Cochran	Clinton	50.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.5%
	Other	12.5%

Coke	Clinton	48.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	48.1%
	Other	3.8%

Coleman	Clinton	60.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.2%
	Other	0.8%

Collin	Clinton	59.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.4%
	Other	0.5%

Collingsworth	Clinton	59.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.3%
	Other	1.6%

Colorado	Clinton	74.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	23.7%
	Other	1.6%

Comal	Clinton	60.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.1%
	Other	1.0%

Comanche	Clinton	63.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.6%
	Other	2.9%

Concho	Clinton	69.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	28.2%
	Other	2.6%

Cooke	Clinton	56.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	42.0%
	Other	1.6%

Coryell	Clinton	62.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.8%
	Other	1.6%

Cottle	Clinton	57.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.3%
	Other	4.3%

Crane	Clinton	66.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.5%
	Other	8.5%

Crockett	Clinton	37.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.0%
	Other	28.2%

Crosby	Clinton	58.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.4%
	Other	1.3%

Culberson	Clinton	62.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.8%
	Other	10.1%

Dallam	Clinton	61.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.3%
	Other	5.1%

Dallas	Clinton	71.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.8%
	Other	0.7%

Dawson	Clinton	70.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.0%
	Other	3.8%

Deaf Smith	Clinton	67.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.2%
	Other	3.1%

Delta	Clinton	67.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.5%
	Other	0.6%

Denton	Clinton	50.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	48.5%
	Other	0.7%

Dewitt	Clinton	70.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.1%
	Other	2.6%

Dickens	Clinton	52.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.0%
	Other	4.0%

Dimmit	Clinton	68.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	20.4%
	Other	10.7%

Donley	Clinton	47.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	50.7%
	Other	1.4%

Duval	Clinton	76.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	17.5%
	Other	6.3%

Eastland	Clinton	55.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.7%
	Other	4.6%

Ector	Clinton	64.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.0%
	Other	2.1%

Edwards	Clinton	57.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.0%
	Other	5.5%

El Paso	Clinton	66.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.5%
	Other	2.5%

Ellis	Clinton	69.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.2%
	Other	1.3%

Erath	Clinton	52.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.9%
	Other	2.6%

Falls	Clinton	81.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	17.0%
	Other	1.6%

Fannin	Clinton	63.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.7%
	Other	2.4%

Fayette	Clinton	63.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.8%
	Other	2.3%

Fisher	Clinton	53.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.4%
	Other	12.3%

Floyd	Clinton	65.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.4%
	Other	7.7%

Foard	Clinton	34.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	48.1%
	Other	17.6%

Fort Bend	Clinton	74.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	24.9%
	Other	0.4%

Franklin	Clinton	67.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.2%
	Other	2.1%

Freestone	Clinton	76.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	20.6%
	Other	2.6%

Frio	Clinton	67.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	22.9%
	Other	9.4%

Gaines	Clinton	55.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	36.2%
	Other	8.0%

Galveston	Clinton	68.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.6%
	Other	1.2%

Garza	Clinton	56.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.5%
	Other	8.1%

Gillespie	Clinton	60.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.8%
	Other	0.4%

Glasscock	Clinton	50.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	50.0%

Goliad	Clinton	66.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.8%
	Other	7.8%

Gonzales	Clinton	72.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.3%
	Other	2.4%

Gray	Clinton	53.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.7%
	Other	4.4%

Grayson	Clinton	52.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	45.9%
	Other	1.3%

Gregg	Clinton	78.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	20.8%
	Other	1.2%

Grimes	Clinton	73.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.2%
	Other	1.6%

Guadalupe	Clinton	63.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.8%
	Other	1.2%

Hale	Clinton	60.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.0%
	Other	5.6%

Hall	Clinton	64.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	28.6%
	Other	7.1%

Hamilton	Clinton	56.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.2%
	Other	3.3%

Hansford	Clinton	58.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	36.1%
	Other	5.6%

Hardeman	Clinton	39.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	48.9%
	Other	11.7%

Hardin	Clinton	59.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.9%
	Other	2.6%

Harris	Clinton	70.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	28.5%
	Other	1.0%

Harrison	Clinton	76.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	19.9%
	Other	3.2%

Hartley	Clinton	55.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	36.5%
	Other	7.7%

Haskell	Clinton	58.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.3%
	Other	7.0%

Hays	Clinton	46.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	51.8%
	Other	1.3%

Hemphill	Clinton	65.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.8%

Henderson	Clinton	71.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.9%
	Other	1.6%

Hidalgo	Clinton	69.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.3%
	Other	3.7%

Hill	Clinton	69.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	28.6%
	Other	2.3%

Hockley	Clinton	58.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	36.9%
	Other	4.8%

Hood	Clinton	62.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.6%
	Other	1.8%

Hopkins	Clinton	66.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.7%
	Other	1.5%

Houston	Clinton	80.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	17.4%
	Other	2.6%

Howard	Clinton	63.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.7%
	Other	1.8%

Hudspeth	Clinton	39.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.1%
	Other	21.0%

Hunt	Clinton	60.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.6%
	Other	0.9%

Hutchinson	Clinton	55.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.6%
	Other	6.6%

Irion	Clinton	65.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.6%
	Other	2.3%

Jack	Clinton	62.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.9%
	Other	5.0%

Jackson	Clinton	70.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	24.9%
	Other	4.5%

Jasper	Clinton	75.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	21.9%
	Other	2.4%

Jeff Davis	Clinton	49.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	46.6%
	Other	3.9%

Jefferson	Clinton	76.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	20.6%
	Other	2.5%

Jim Hogg	Clinton	75.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	18.8%
	Other	6.2%

Jim Wells	Clinton	71.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	21.9%
	Other	6.4%

Johnson	Clinton	58.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.4%
	Other	1.1%

Jones	Clinton	63.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.7%
	Other	2.2%

Karnes	Clinton	53.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.9%
	Other	12.1%

Kaufman	Clinton	69.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.6%
	Other	0.7%

Kendall	Clinton	56.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.0%
	Other	0.8%

Kenedy	Clinton	59.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.2%
	Other	10.4%

Kent	Clinton	36.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	46.7%
	Other	16.7%

Kerr	Clinton	58.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.6%
	Other	1.1%

Kimble	Clinton	44.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	52.3%
	Other	3.1%

King	Clinton	66.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.3%

Kinney	Clinton	60.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.8%
	Other	8.4%

Kleberg	Clinton	70.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.6%
	Other	3.7%

Knox	Clinton	71.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	17.9%
	Other	10.5%

Lamar	Clinton	69.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.1%
	Other	1.6%

Lamb	Clinton	53.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.9%
	Other	19.8%

Lampasas	Clinton	59.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.2%
	Other	2.0%

La Salle	Clinton	69.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	19.7%
	Other	10.5%

Lavaca	Clinton	68.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.1%
	Other	2.3%

Lee	Clinton	65.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.1%
	Other	2.5%

Leon	Clinton	74.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	22.9%
	Other	2.8%

Liberty	Clinton	71.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.2%
	Other	2.5%

Limestone	Clinton	79.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	19.3%
	Other	1.6%

Lipscomb	Clinton	64.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.4%
	Other	2.9%

Live Oak	Clinton	67.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	24.3%
	Other	8.3%

Llano	Clinton	64.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.3%
	Other	1.9%

Loving	Clinton	25.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.7%
	Other	33.3%

Lubbock	Clinton	57.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.0%
	Other	1.6%

Lynn	Clinton	58.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.7%

McCulloch	Clinton	66.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.5%
	Other	3.5%

McLennan	Clinton	67.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.9%
	Other	1.2%

McMullen	Clinton	80.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	20.0%

Madison	Clinton	75.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	23.2%
	Other	1.7%

Marion	Clinton	76.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	22.2%
	Other	1.6%

Martin	Clinton	59.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.9%
	Other	13.1%

Mason	Clinton	62.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.2%
	Other	2.1%

Matagorda	Clinton	74.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	23.4%
	Other	2.4%

Maverick	Clinton	69.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	24.1%
	Other	6.3%

Medina	Clinton	69.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	28.3%
	Other	1.9%

Menard	Clinton	56.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.0%
	Other	4.9%

Midland	Clinton	63.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.6%
	Other	2.3%

Milam	Clinton	67.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.6%
	Other	2.6%

Mills	Clinton	53.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.6%
	Other	3.2%

Mitchell	Clinton	73.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	22.1%
	Other	4.7%

Montague	Clinton	54.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.3%
	Other	2.5%

Montgomery	Clinton	59.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.8%
	Other	0.8%

Moore	Clinton	59.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.5%
	Other	7.6%

Morris	Clinton	71.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	24.7%
	Other	3.9%

Motley	Clinton	68.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.6%

Nacogdoches	Clinton	65.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.8%
	Other	1.0%

Navarro	Clinton	72.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.3%
	Other	2.3%

Newton	Clinton	46.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.4%
	Other	13.4%

Nolan	Clinton	65.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.6%
	Other	4.9%

Nueces	Clinton	70.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.8%
	Other	1.7%

Ochiltree	Clinton	53.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.3%
	Other	3.0%

Oldham	Clinton	68.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.0%
	Other	6.3%

Orange	Clinton	68.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.0%
	Other	1.9%

Palo Pinto	Clinton	59.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.9%
	Other	2.6%

Panola	Clinton	80.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	18.6%
	Other	1.3%

Parker	Clinton	54.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.5%
	Other	0.9%

Parmer	Clinton	72.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	23.0%
	Other	4.4%

Pecos	Clinton	55.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.2%
	Other	11.4%

Polk	Clinton	71.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.9%
	Other	2.0%

Potter	Clinton	56.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.5%
	Other	2.0%

Presidio	Clinton	57.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.1%
	Other	9.5%

Rains	Clinton	64.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.1%
	Other	2.6%

Randall	Clinton	51.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	47.7%
	Other	1.3%

Reagan	Clinton	63.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	36.8%

Real	Clinton	53.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.2%
	Other	1.9%

Red River	Clinton	79.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	18.2%
	Other	2.7%

Reeves	Clinton	59.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.7%
	Other	10.7%

Refugio	Clinton	64.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.7%
	Other	6.2%

Roberts	Clinton	60.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.0%

Robertson	Clinton	70.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	22.9%
	Other	6.2%

Rockwall	Clinton	59.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	36.1%
	Other	4.4%

Runnels	Clinton	57.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.6%
	Other	2.9%

Rusk	Clinton	78.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	19.4%
	Other	2.5%

Sabine	Clinton	66.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	28.4%
	Other	5.2%

San Augustine	Clinton	83.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	14.0%
	Other	2.9%

San Jacinto	Clinton	72.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	24.7%
	Other	3.2%

San Patricio	Clinton	73.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	23.6%
	Other	3.3%

San Saba	Clinton	67.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.4%
	Other	1.2%

Schleicher	Clinton	64.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.7%
	Other	8.9%

Scurry	Clinton	61.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.0%
	Other	4.4%

Shackelford	Clinton	50.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	46.7%
	Other	3.3%

Shelby	Clinton	77.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	20.2%
	Other	2.0%

Sherman	Clinton	61.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.8%
	Other	12.9%

Smith	Clinton	73.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.5%
	Other	1.0%

Somervell	Clinton	49.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	50.0%
	Other	0.7%

Starr	Clinton	77.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	18.3%
	Other	3.9%

Stephens	Clinton	55.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.2%
	Other	1.2%

Sterling	Clinton	50.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.0%
	Other	10.0%

Stonewall	Clinton	57.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.3%
	Other	6.9%

Sutton	Clinton	69.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.6%
	Other	5.1%

Swisher	Clinton	60.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.5%
	Other	6.0%

Tarrant	Clinton	65.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.2%
	Other	0.6%

Taylor	Clinton	54.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.4%
	Other	1.9%

Terrell	Clinton	43.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.6%
	Other	14.9%

Terry	Clinton	59.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.7%
	Other	6.3%

Throckmorton	Clinton	61.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.1%

Titus	Clinton	71.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.5%
	Other	3.2%

Tom Green	Clinton	55.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.8%
	Other	2.2%

Travis	Clinton	48.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	51.4%
	Other	0.4%

Trinity	Clinton	71.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.2%
	Other	3.0%

Tyler	Clinton	74.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	22.8%
	Other	3.0%

Upshur	Clinton	71.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.6%
	Other	1.7%

Upton	Clinton	55.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.6%
	Other	16.6%

Uvalde	Clinton	63.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.7%
	Other	9.0%

Val Verde	Clinton	65.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	28.3%
	Other	5.9%

Van Zandt	Clinton	64.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.5%
	Other	2.4%

Victoria	Clinton	64.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.7%
	Other	2.8%

Walker	Clinton	61.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.4%
	Other	1.3%

Waller	Clinton	67.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.9%
	Other	1.7%

Ward	Clinton	62.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.9%
	Other	7.9%

Washington	Clinton	72.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.9%
	Other	1.1%

Webb	Clinton	71.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	23.9%
	Other	4.2%

Wharton	Clinton	78.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	18.3%
	Other	3.2%

Wheeler	Clinton	59.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.1%
	Other	3.2%

Wichita	Clinton	55.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.2%
	Other	1.4%

Wilbarger	Clinton	61.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.9%
	Other	4.5%

Willacy	Clinton	70.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	22.2%
	Other	7.7%

Williamson	Clinton	52.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	46.7%
	Other	0.6%

Wilson	Clinton	71.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.8%
	Other	1.7%

Winkler	Clinton	69.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.6%
	Other	4.7%

Wise	Clinton	56.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.8%
	Other	2.0%

Wood	Clinton	68.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.5%
	Other	1.8%

Yoakum	Clinton	42.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	47.6%
	Other	9.5%

Young	Clinton	58.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.6%
	Other	2.6%

Zapata	Clinton	67.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	23.6%
	Other	8.5%

Zavala	Clinton	75.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	18.1%
	Other	6.4%

National DataGraph for 2016 - Texas Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved