Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2019-02-24

Map

Map

Adams	Young	55.3%
	Watson	41.1%
	Other	3.6%

Alamosa	Young	51.0%
	Watson	45.6%
	Other	3.4%

Arapahoe	Young	56.1%
	Watson	41.2%
	Other	2.6%

Archuleta	Young	39.9%
	Watson	56.1%
	Other	3.9%

Baca	Young	18.0%
	Watson	78.0%
	Other	4.0%

Bent	Young	36.1%
	Watson	59.6%
	Other	4.3%

Boulder	Young	71.1%
	Watson	27.1%
	Other	1.8%

Broomfield	Young	56.9%
	Watson	40.6%
	Other	2.5%

Chaffee	Young	49.3%
	Watson	47.4%
	Other	3.3%

Cheyenne	Young	13.9%
	Watson	83.0%
	Other	3.1%

Clear Creek	Young	53.7%
	Watson	42.2%
	Other	4.1%

Conejos	Young	48.6%
	Watson	48.9%
	Other	2.5%

Costilla	Young	67.3%
	Watson	29.2%
	Other	3.5%

Crowley	Young	29.0%
	Watson	66.0%
	Other	5.0%

Custer	Young	29.1%
	Watson	68.0%
	Other	2.9%

Delta	Young	30.7%
	Watson	65.5%
	Other	3.8%

Denver	Young	76.0%
	Watson	22.0%
	Other	2.0%

Dolores	Young	22.1%
	Watson	73.4%
	Other	4.5%

Douglas	Young	39.1%
	Watson	58.7%
	Other	2.2%

Eagle	Young	59.0%
	Watson	38.5%
	Other	2.5%

Elbert	Young	22.1%
	Watson	75.1%
	Other	2.8%

El Paso	Young	38.5%
	Watson	58.2%
	Other	3.4%

Fremont	Young	29.8%
	Watson	66.0%
	Other	4.2%

Garfield	Young	47.5%
	Watson	49.6%
	Other	2.9%

Gilpin	Young	52.0%
	Watson	43.5%
	Other	4.5%

Grand	Young	44.6%
	Watson	52.0%
	Other	3.4%

Gunnison	Young	61.4%
	Watson	35.5%
	Other	3.2%

Hinsdale	Young	37.4%
	Watson	57.4%
	Other	5.2%

Huerfano	Young	49.9%
	Watson	45.7%
	Other	4.4%

Jackson	Young	18.4%
	Watson	78.6%
	Other	3.1%

Jefferson	Young	53.5%
	Watson	43.8%
	Other	2.8%

Kiowa	Young	13.8%
	Watson	84.0%
	Other	2.3%

Kit Carson	Young	17.3%
	Watson	80.2%
	Other	2.4%

Lake	Young	59.8%
	Watson	34.7%
	Other	5.5%

La Plata	Young	55.2%
	Watson	41.9%
	Other	2.9%

Larimer	Young	52.8%
	Watson	44.5%
	Other	2.7%

Las Animas	Young	48.1%
	Watson	48.7%
	Other	3.2%

Lincoln	Young	17.8%
	Watson	79.6%
	Other	2.6%

Logan	Young	22.1%
	Watson	74.8%
	Other	3.1%

Mesa	Young	32.4%
	Watson	64.0%
	Other	3.5%

Mineral	Young	44.0%
	Watson	53.6%
	Other	2.4%

Moffat	Young	17.4%
	Watson	78.9%
	Other	3.6%

Montezuma	Young	36.8%
	Watson	59.7%
	Other	3.5%

Montrose	Young	28.7%
	Watson	68.2%
	Other	3.1%

Morgan	Young	27.7%
	Watson	69.2%
	Other	3.1%

Otero	Young	38.7%
	Watson	57.4%
	Other	3.9%

Ouray	Young	56.5%
	Watson	40.8%
	Other	2.7%

Park	Young	37.6%
	Watson	58.5%
	Other	4.0%

Phillips	Young	19.6%
	Watson	78.0%
	Other	2.4%

Pitkin	Young	70.6%
	Watson	27.2%
	Other	2.1%

Prowers	Young	26.1%
	Watson	70.9%
	Other	3.0%

Pueblo	Young	50.7%
	Watson	45.6%
	Other	3.7%

Rio Blanco	Young	14.6%
	Watson	82.2%
	Other	3.2%

Rio Grande	Young	39.7%
	Watson	57.3%
	Other	3.0%

Routt	Young	58.5%
	Watson	39.0%
	Other	2.5%

Saguache	Young	57.8%
	Watson	38.0%
	Other	4.3%

San Juan	Young	59.3%
	Watson	37.7%
	Other	3.0%

San Miguel	Young	73.4%
	Watson	24.5%
	Other	2.1%

Sedgwick	Young	23.4%
	Watson	73.9%
	Other	2.7%

Summit	Young	63.2%
	Watson	33.8%
	Other	3.1%

Teller	Young	29.5%
	Watson	67.3%
	Other	3.3%

Washington	Young	12.8%
	Watson	84.6%
	Other	2.6%

Weld	Young	39.2%
	Watson	56.7%
	Other	4.1%

Yuma	Young	17.5%
	Watson	80.1%
	Other	2.4%

National DataGraph for 2018 - Colorado Results for 2018

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved