Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-07-24

Map

Map

Adams	Romer	62.9%
	Hughes	34.5%
	Other	2.6%

Alamosa	Romer	58.7%
	Hughes	39.4%
	Other	1.9%

Arapahoe	Romer	46.8%
	Hughes	50.5%
	Other	2.7%

Archuleta	Romer	44.2%
	Hughes	53.8%
	Other	1.9%

Baca	Romer	54.7%
	Hughes	43.4%
	Other	1.9%

Bent	Romer	65.2%
	Hughes	32.4%
	Other	2.4%

Boulder	Romer	54.5%
	Hughes	42.0%
	Other	3.5%

Chaffee	Romer	51.1%
	Hughes	44.0%
	Other	4.9%

Cheyenne	Romer	51.4%
	Hughes	46.9%
	Other	1.6%

Clear Creek	Romer	51.8%
	Hughes	44.0%
	Other	4.2%

Conejos	Romer	61.0%
	Hughes	37.3%
	Other	1.7%

Costilla	Romer	81.0%
	Hughes	18.3%
	Other	0.7%

Crowley	Romer	53.4%
	Hughes	45.2%
	Other	1.4%

Custer	Romer	43.2%
	Hughes	53.1%
	Other	3.7%

Delta	Romer	47.7%
	Hughes	50.5%
	Other	1.9%

Denver	Romer	67.4%
	Hughes	29.8%
	Other	2.8%

Dolores	Romer	53.9%
	Hughes	45.1%
	Other	1.0%

Douglas	Romer	39.3%
	Hughes	58.5%
	Other	2.1%

Eagle	Romer	48.3%
	Hughes	48.2%
	Other	3.6%

Elbert	Romer	45.3%
	Hughes	52.2%
	Other	2.5%

El Paso	Romer	38.6%
	Hughes	58.7%
	Other	2.7%

Fremont	Romer	55.7%
	Hughes	41.5%
	Other	2.8%

Garfield	Romer	51.2%
	Hughes	45.8%
	Other	2.9%

Gilpin	Romer	55.1%
	Hughes	37.8%
	Other	7.2%

Grand	Romer	43.7%
	Hughes	53.5%
	Other	2.8%

Gunnison	Romer	53.1%
	Hughes	42.7%
	Other	4.2%

Hinsdale	Romer	32.6%
	Hughes	64.4%
	Other	3.0%

Huerfano	Romer	68.9%
	Hughes	28.7%
	Other	2.4%

Jackson	Romer	43.0%
	Hughes	55.0%
	Other	2.0%

Jefferson	Romer	51.4%
	Hughes	45.9%
	Other	2.7%

Kiowa	Romer	51.7%
	Hughes	47.5%
	Other	0.8%

Kit Carson	Romer	45.3%
	Hughes	53.2%
	Other	1.5%

Lake	Romer	65.5%
	Hughes	28.1%
	Other	6.5%

La Plata	Romer	48.6%
	Hughes	48.9%
	Other	2.5%

Larimer	Romer	49.9%
	Hughes	46.6%
	Other	3.5%

Las Animas	Romer	75.7%
	Hughes	23.3%
	Other	0.9%

Lincoln	Romer	47.8%
	Hughes	51.2%
	Other	1.0%

Logan	Romer	50.6%
	Hughes	47.9%
	Other	1.5%

Mesa	Romer	48.5%
	Hughes	49.0%
	Other	2.5%

Mineral	Romer	56.3%
	Hughes	40.6%
	Other	3.1%

Moffat	Romer	45.7%
	Hughes	50.3%
	Other	4.1%

Montezuma	Romer	44.1%
	Hughes	53.7%
	Other	2.2%

Montrose	Romer	48.3%
	Hughes	50.0%
	Other	1.7%

Morgan	Romer	51.4%
	Hughes	46.1%
	Other	2.5%

Otero	Romer	59.2%
	Hughes	38.1%
	Other	2.7%

Ouray	Romer	41.4%
	Hughes	56.4%
	Other	2.2%

Park	Romer	52.2%
	Hughes	39.6%
	Other	8.2%

Phillips	Romer	52.7%
	Hughes	45.9%
	Other	1.4%

Pitkin	Romer	46.4%
	Hughes	41.3%
	Other	12.3%

Prowers	Romer	61.9%
	Hughes	34.6%
	Other	3.5%

Pueblo	Romer	69.5%
	Hughes	28.0%
	Other	2.4%

Rio Blanco	Romer	38.5%
	Hughes	58.4%
	Other	3.1%

Rio Grande	Romer	50.0%
	Hughes	48.4%
	Other	1.6%

Routt	Romer	48.2%
	Hughes	48.0%
	Other	3.9%

Saguache	Romer	58.8%
	Hughes	38.9%
	Other	2.2%

San Juan	Romer	47.7%
	Hughes	45.3%
	Other	6.9%

San Miguel	Romer	52.5%
	Hughes	41.1%
	Other	6.4%

Sedgwick	Romer	44.2%
	Hughes	54.6%
	Other	1.2%

Summit	Romer	50.8%
	Hughes	45.6%
	Other	3.7%

Teller	Romer	42.0%
	Hughes	53.7%
	Other	4.3%

Washington	Romer	43.9%
	Hughes	54.4%
	Other	1.7%

Weld	Romer	50.3%
	Hughes	47.4%
	Other	2.3%

Yuma	Romer	46.5%
	Hughes	51.9%
	Other	1.6%

National DataGraph for 1982 - Colorado Results for 1982

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved