Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-07-28

Map

Map

Adams	Haskell	54.3%
	Allott	43.2%
	Other	2.4%

Alamosa	Haskell	54.7%
	Allott	39.6%
	Other	5.7%

Arapahoe	Haskell	41.3%
	Allott	57.7%
	Other	1.0%

Archuleta	Haskell	43.1%
	Allott	50.7%
	Other	6.2%

Baca	Haskell	42.6%
	Allott	56.8%
	Other	0.5%

Bent	Haskell	53.3%
	Allott	44.8%
	Other	2.0%

Boulder	Haskell	52.7%
	Allott	45.6%
	Other	1.7%

Chaffee	Haskell	44.7%
	Allott	53.4%
	Other	1.9%

Cheyenne	Haskell	44.2%
	Allott	54.6%
	Other	1.3%

Clear Creek	Haskell	46.2%
	Allott	51.0%
	Other	2.8%

Conejos	Haskell	42.8%
	Allott	42.9%
	Other	14.4%

Costilla	Haskell	57.9%
	Allott	32.2%
	Other	9.8%

Crowley	Haskell	45.2%
	Allott	53.0%
	Other	1.8%

Custer	Haskell	45.5%
	Allott	52.5%
	Other	2.0%

Delta	Haskell	49.8%
	Allott	49.3%
	Other	0.9%

Denver	Haskell	52.5%
	Allott	44.7%
	Other	2.8%

Dolores	Haskell	45.0%
	Allott	54.4%
	Other	0.6%

Douglas	Haskell	44.0%
	Allott	54.9%
	Other	1.1%

Eagle	Haskell	53.8%
	Allott	42.5%
	Other	3.7%

Elbert	Haskell	43.5%
	Allott	55.9%
	Other	0.6%

El Paso	Haskell	50.3%
	Allott	47.4%
	Other	2.3%

Fremont	Haskell	52.8%
	Allott	46.0%
	Other	1.2%

Garfield	Haskell	53.1%
	Allott	45.9%
	Other	1.0%

Gilpin	Haskell	53.6%
	Allott	43.2%
	Other	3.2%

Grand	Haskell	44.2%
	Allott	54.6%
	Other	1.2%

Gunnison	Haskell	56.0%
	Allott	42.8%
	Other	1.2%

Hinsdale	Haskell	42.9%
	Allott	56.2%
	Other	0.9%

Huerfano	Haskell	62.5%
	Allott	31.8%
	Other	5.7%

Jackson	Haskell	36.1%
	Allott	63.1%
	Other	0.9%

Jefferson	Haskell	43.6%
	Allott	55.3%
	Other	1.1%

Kiowa	Haskell	43.8%
	Allott	55.6%
	Other	0.6%

Kit Carson	Haskell	34.9%
	Allott	63.9%
	Other	1.2%

Lake	Haskell	63.1%
	Allott	34.1%
	Other	2.8%

La Plata	Haskell	43.2%
	Allott	53.8%
	Other	3.1%

Larimer	Haskell	44.6%
	Allott	53.8%
	Other	1.5%

Las Animas	Haskell	63.2%
	Allott	32.7%
	Other	4.2%

Lincoln	Haskell	49.0%
	Allott	50.6%
	Other	0.5%

Logan	Haskell	52.8%
	Allott	46.6%
	Other	0.6%

Mesa	Haskell	52.2%
	Allott	46.5%
	Other	1.3%

Mineral	Haskell	47.0%
	Allott	51.6%
	Other	1.4%

Moffat	Haskell	47.1%
	Allott	50.2%
	Other	2.7%

Montezuma	Haskell	44.9%
	Allott	53.4%
	Other	1.7%

Montrose	Haskell	46.1%
	Allott	51.6%
	Other	2.3%

Morgan	Haskell	46.5%
	Allott	52.8%
	Other	0.7%

Otero	Haskell	46.7%
	Allott	50.4%
	Other	2.9%

Ouray	Haskell	56.5%
	Allott	42.1%
	Other	1.3%

Park	Haskell	47.6%
	Allott	50.7%
	Other	1.7%

Phillips	Haskell	45.8%
	Allott	53.8%
	Other	0.4%

Pitkin	Haskell	63.8%
	Allott	33.2%
	Other	3.0%

Prowers	Haskell	44.7%
	Allott	54.3%
	Other	1.0%

Pueblo	Haskell	54.9%
	Allott	40.8%
	Other	4.3%

Rio Blanco	Haskell	40.3%
	Allott	58.5%
	Other	1.3%

Rio Grande	Haskell	39.1%
	Allott	55.6%
	Other	5.3%

Routt	Haskell	54.2%
	Allott	44.6%
	Other	1.3%

Saguache	Haskell	51.0%
	Allott	43.4%
	Other	5.6%

San Juan	Haskell	61.7%
	Allott	35.0%
	Other	3.3%

San Miguel	Haskell	61.2%
	Allott	37.2%
	Other	1.6%

Sedgwick	Haskell	42.6%
	Allott	56.6%
	Other	0.8%

Summit	Haskell	50.6%
	Allott	46.5%
	Other	2.9%

Teller	Haskell	53.9%
	Allott	44.5%
	Other	1.6%

Washington	Haskell	46.8%
	Allott	52.3%
	Other	0.9%

Weld	Haskell	45.2%
	Allott	51.0%
	Other	3.8%

Yuma	Haskell	41.3%
	Allott	58.1%
	Other	0.6%

National DataGraph for 1972 - Colorado Results for 1972

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved