Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-01-18

Map

Map

Alameda	Lockyer	69.0%
	Ackerman	21.0%
	Other	10.1%

Alpine	Lockyer	46.8%
	Ackerman	37.7%
	Other	15.5%

Amador	Lockyer	42.7%
	Ackerman	49.8%
	Other	7.5%

Butte	Lockyer	37.3%
	Ackerman	51.4%
	Other	11.3%

Calaveras	Lockyer	39.4%
	Ackerman	50.4%
	Other	10.2%

Colusa	Lockyer	34.5%
	Ackerman	59.7%
	Other	5.8%

Contra Costa	Lockyer	57.3%
	Ackerman	34.6%
	Other	8.0%

Del Norte	Lockyer	44.8%
	Ackerman	45.0%
	Other	10.2%

El Dorado	Lockyer	36.0%
	Ackerman	55.3%
	Other	8.7%

Fresno	Lockyer	43.8%
	Ackerman	50.0%
	Other	6.2%

Glenn	Lockyer	31.7%
	Ackerman	60.4%
	Other	7.8%

Humboldt	Lockyer	48.2%
	Ackerman	34.9%
	Other	16.9%

Imperial	Lockyer	55.3%
	Ackerman	37.2%
	Other	7.5%

Inyo	Lockyer	35.5%
	Ackerman	55.2%
	Other	9.3%

Kern	Lockyer	36.7%
	Ackerman	57.0%
	Other	6.4%

Kings	Lockyer	43.9%
	Ackerman	51.1%
	Other	5.0%

Lake	Lockyer	52.0%
	Ackerman	38.6%
	Other	9.4%

Lassen	Lockyer	34.9%
	Ackerman	56.9%
	Other	8.2%

Los Angeles	Lockyer	59.7%
	Ackerman	32.2%
	Other	8.1%

Madera	Lockyer	37.0%
	Ackerman	56.8%
	Other	6.2%

Marin	Lockyer	63.3%
	Ackerman	26.4%
	Other	10.3%

Mariposa	Lockyer	37.3%
	Ackerman	53.1%
	Other	9.6%

Mendocino	Lockyer	50.7%
	Ackerman	30.7%
	Other	18.6%

Merced	Lockyer	49.1%
	Ackerman	44.3%
	Other	6.5%

Modoc	Lockyer	30.8%
	Ackerman	60.5%
	Other	8.8%

Mono	Lockyer	39.5%
	Ackerman	49.8%
	Other	10.6%

Monterey	Lockyer	56.5%
	Ackerman	35.0%
	Other	8.5%

Napa	Lockyer	54.3%
	Ackerman	36.3%
	Other	9.4%

Nevada	Lockyer	37.8%
	Ackerman	50.9%
	Other	11.3%

Orange	Lockyer	35.5%
	Ackerman	57.4%
	Other	7.1%

Placer	Lockyer	36.3%
	Ackerman	57.1%
	Other	6.6%

Plumas	Lockyer	37.2%
	Ackerman	53.4%
	Other	9.4%

Riverside	Lockyer	43.4%
	Ackerman	50.4%
	Other	6.3%

Sacramento	Lockyer	49.5%
	Ackerman	42.3%
	Other	8.1%

San Benito	Lockyer	53.2%
	Ackerman	39.5%
	Other	7.4%

San Bernardino	Lockyer	44.4%
	Ackerman	48.3%
	Other	7.3%

San Diego	Lockyer	44.3%
	Ackerman	48.0%
	Other	7.7%

San Francisco	Lockyer	73.8%
	Ackerman	14.9%
	Other	11.4%

San Joaquin	Lockyer	48.1%
	Ackerman	44.9%
	Other	6.9%

San Luis Obispo	Lockyer	40.5%
	Ackerman	50.2%
	Other	9.4%

San Mateo	Lockyer	62.4%
	Ackerman	28.4%
	Other	9.3%

Santa Barbara	Lockyer	46.5%
	Ackerman	44.3%
	Other	9.2%

Santa Clara	Lockyer	58.7%
	Ackerman	32.5%
	Other	8.8%

Santa Cruz	Lockyer	58.6%
	Ackerman	26.0%
	Other	15.4%

Shasta	Lockyer	35.3%
	Ackerman	57.1%
	Other	7.6%

Sierra	Lockyer	35.8%
	Ackerman	53.3%
	Other	11.0%

Siskiyou	Lockyer	36.4%
	Ackerman	53.8%
	Other	9.8%

Solano	Lockyer	55.5%
	Ackerman	37.0%
	Other	7.5%

Sonoma	Lockyer	56.6%
	Ackerman	29.7%
	Other	13.7%

Stanislaus	Lockyer	47.6%
	Ackerman	45.9%
	Other	6.6%

Sutter	Lockyer	33.5%
	Ackerman	60.6%
	Other	5.8%

Tehama	Lockyer	37.6%
	Ackerman	53.8%
	Other	8.5%

Trinity	Lockyer	41.4%
	Ackerman	45.2%
	Other	13.3%

Tulare	Lockyer	37.8%
	Ackerman	56.6%
	Other	5.6%

Tuolumne	Lockyer	42.4%
	Ackerman	49.6%
	Other	8.0%

Ventura	Lockyer	45.3%
	Ackerman	46.7%
	Other	8.0%

Yolo	Lockyer	54.1%
	Ackerman	35.5%
	Other	10.4%

Yuba	Lockyer	34.9%
	Ackerman	56.5%
	Other	8.6%

National DataGraph for 2002 - California Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved