Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2008-02-01

Map

Map

Alameda	Fong Eu	68.7%
	Flores	25.2%
	Other	6.0%

Alpine	Fong Eu	50.7%
	Flores	35.6%
	Other	13.7%

Amador	Fong Eu	51.5%
	Flores	39.7%
	Other	8.8%

Butte	Fong Eu	50.1%
	Flores	41.5%
	Other	8.4%

Calaveras	Fong Eu	51.3%
	Flores	39.1%
	Other	9.6%

Colusa	Fong Eu	53.5%
	Flores	40.1%
	Other	6.4%

Contra Costa	Fong Eu	59.7%
	Flores	33.5%
	Other	6.8%

Del Norte	Fong Eu	55.5%
	Flores	35.2%
	Other	9.3%

El Dorado	Fong Eu	46.9%
	Flores	45.2%
	Other	7.9%

Fresno	Fong Eu	60.4%
	Flores	33.9%
	Other	5.7%

Glenn	Fong Eu	49.6%
	Flores	41.0%
	Other	9.4%

Humboldt	Fong Eu	59.6%
	Flores	30.4%
	Other	10.0%

Imperial	Fong Eu	54.1%
	Flores	37.5%
	Other	8.4%

Inyo	Fong Eu	42.4%
	Flores	50.1%
	Other	7.5%

Kern	Fong Eu	51.0%
	Flores	41.6%
	Other	7.4%

Kings	Fong Eu	62.9%
	Flores	32.2%
	Other	4.9%

Lake	Fong Eu	54.9%
	Flores	35.6%
	Other	9.5%

Lassen	Fong Eu	56.7%
	Flores	32.9%
	Other	10.4%

Los Angeles	Fong Eu	50.2%
	Flores	43.1%
	Other	6.7%

Madera	Fong Eu	57.6%
	Flores	36.2%
	Other	6.2%

Marin	Fong Eu	62.9%
	Flores	29.5%
	Other	7.6%

Mariposa	Fong Eu	53.6%
	Flores	38.3%
	Other	8.1%

Mendocino	Fong Eu	54.5%
	Flores	31.1%
	Other	14.4%

Merced	Fong Eu	60.9%
	Flores	32.2%
	Other	6.9%

Modoc	Fong Eu	50.5%
	Flores	37.7%
	Other	11.8%

Mono	Fong Eu	48.4%
	Flores	44.0%
	Other	7.6%

Monterey	Fong Eu	62.4%
	Flores	30.2%
	Other	7.5%

Napa	Fong Eu	54.6%
	Flores	37.3%
	Other	8.1%

Nevada	Fong Eu	47.3%
	Flores	43.8%
	Other	8.9%

Orange	Fong Eu	36.4%
	Flores	56.2%
	Other	7.4%

Placer	Fong Eu	47.8%
	Flores	44.8%
	Other	7.4%

Plumas	Fong Eu	57.4%
	Flores	34.9%
	Other	7.6%

Riverside	Fong Eu	40.9%
	Flores	51.8%
	Other	7.3%

Sacramento	Fong Eu	54.5%
	Flores	38.4%
	Other	7.2%

San Benito	Fong Eu	60.5%
	Flores	31.6%
	Other	7.8%

San Bernardino	Fong Eu	42.6%
	Flores	48.7%
	Other	8.7%

San Diego	Fong Eu	44.4%
	Flores	45.4%
	Other	10.2%

San Francisco	Fong Eu	73.3%
	Flores	19.4%
	Other	7.3%

San Joaquin	Fong Eu	57.7%
	Flores	36.2%
	Other	6.1%

San Luis Obispo	Fong Eu	50.5%
	Flores	41.6%
	Other	7.9%

San Mateo	Fong Eu	60.5%
	Flores	31.8%
	Other	7.7%

Santa Barbara	Fong Eu	53.5%
	Flores	39.4%
	Other	7.1%

Santa Clara	Fong Eu	56.5%
	Flores	34.5%
	Other	9.1%

Santa Cruz	Fong Eu	64.4%
	Flores	24.8%
	Other	10.8%

Shasta	Fong Eu	48.3%
	Flores	43.1%
	Other	8.6%

Sierra	Fong Eu	58.5%
	Flores	32.9%
	Other	8.5%

Siskiyou	Fong Eu	57.5%
	Flores	32.1%
	Other	10.5%

Solano	Fong Eu	57.3%
	Flores	34.0%
	Other	8.7%

Sonoma	Fong Eu	60.4%
	Flores	29.6%
	Other	9.9%

Stanislaus	Fong Eu	57.1%
	Flores	36.6%
	Other	6.3%

Sutter	Fong Eu	47.2%
	Flores	46.2%
	Other	6.6%

Tehama	Fong Eu	52.4%
	Flores	36.0%
	Other	11.5%

Trinity	Fong Eu	53.8%
	Flores	33.6%
	Other	12.7%

Tulare	Fong Eu	54.7%
	Flores	39.5%
	Other	5.8%

Tuolumne	Fong Eu	52.2%
	Flores	39.8%
	Other	7.9%

Ventura	Fong Eu	40.6%
	Flores	50.9%
	Other	8.5%

Yolo	Fong Eu	58.8%
	Flores	33.5%
	Other	7.7%

Yuba	Fong Eu	50.2%
	Flores	41.0%
	Other	8.8%

National DataGraph for 1990 - California Results for 1990

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved