Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-02-26

Map

Map

Alameda	Cranston	66.8%
	Gann	26.6%
	Other	6.6%

Alpine	Cranston	53.3%
	Gann	37.2%
	Other	9.5%

Amador	Cranston	48.4%
	Gann	43.4%
	Other	8.2%

Butte	Cranston	48.5%
	Gann	43.3%
	Other	8.2%

Calaveras	Cranston	46.1%
	Gann	43.8%
	Other	10.1%

Colusa	Cranston	56.2%
	Gann	34.1%
	Other	9.7%

Contra Costa	Cranston	60.3%
	Gann	33.9%
	Other	5.8%

Del Norte	Cranston	50.7%
	Gann	37.1%
	Other	12.2%

El Dorado	Cranston	45.6%
	Gann	45.7%
	Other	8.7%

Fresno	Cranston	60.4%
	Gann	34.7%
	Other	5.0%

Glenn	Cranston	49.9%
	Gann	44.2%
	Other	5.9%

Humboldt	Cranston	57.9%
	Gann	32.6%
	Other	9.5%

Imperial	Cranston	59.2%
	Gann	33.6%
	Other	7.2%

Inyo	Cranston	40.2%
	Gann	52.8%
	Other	7.0%

Kern	Cranston	55.6%
	Gann	37.4%
	Other	7.0%

Kings	Cranston	59.2%
	Gann	35.4%
	Other	5.4%

Lake	Cranston	52.9%
	Gann	39.7%
	Other	7.4%

Lassen	Cranston	54.2%
	Gann	36.9%
	Other	8.9%

Los Angeles	Cranston	57.0%
	Gann	37.8%
	Other	5.2%

Madera	Cranston	58.1%
	Gann	35.8%
	Other	6.1%

Marin	Cranston	64.3%
	Gann	29.1%
	Other	6.6%

Mariposa	Cranston	52.4%
	Gann	39.5%
	Other	8.1%

Mendocino	Cranston	56.9%
	Gann	32.6%
	Other	10.6%

Merced	Cranston	59.5%
	Gann	31.4%
	Other	9.0%

Modoc	Cranston	45.7%
	Gann	47.3%
	Other	7.0%

Mono	Cranston	43.6%
	Gann	48.1%
	Other	8.2%

Monterey	Cranston	62.0%
	Gann	32.0%
	Other	6.0%

Napa	Cranston	56.7%
	Gann	37.1%
	Other	6.2%

Nevada	Cranston	40.9%
	Gann	48.2%
	Other	10.9%

Orange	Cranston	43.8%
	Gann	49.7%
	Other	6.5%

Placer	Cranston	49.0%
	Gann	42.1%
	Other	8.9%

Plumas	Cranston	48.5%
	Gann	39.4%
	Other	12.1%

Riverside	Cranston	50.7%
	Gann	43.2%
	Other	6.1%

Sacramento	Cranston	56.7%
	Gann	35.2%
	Other	8.1%

San Benito	Cranston	65.2%
	Gann	27.3%
	Other	7.6%

San Bernardino	Cranston	50.9%
	Gann	43.5%
	Other	5.6%

San Diego	Cranston	54.0%
	Gann	39.8%
	Other	6.2%

San Francisco	Cranston	75.6%
	Gann	18.6%
	Other	5.8%

San Joaquin	Cranston	54.4%
	Gann	39.6%
	Other	6.0%

San Luis Obispo	Cranston	57.4%
	Gann	35.1%
	Other	7.6%

San Mateo	Cranston	63.6%
	Gann	27.1%
	Other	9.3%

Santa Barbara	Cranston	58.6%
	Gann	35.4%
	Other	5.9%

Santa Clara	Cranston	60.8%
	Gann	32.6%
	Other	6.7%

Santa Cruz	Cranston	64.3%
	Gann	27.4%
	Other	8.3%

Shasta	Cranston	57.5%
	Gann	35.4%
	Other	7.1%

Sierra	Cranston	54.7%
	Gann	36.2%
	Other	9.1%

Siskiyou	Cranston	54.5%
	Gann	37.6%
	Other	8.0%

Solano	Cranston	58.5%
	Gann	34.5%
	Other	6.9%

Sonoma	Cranston	61.1%
	Gann	31.5%
	Other	7.3%

Stanislaus	Cranston	54.8%
	Gann	35.2%
	Other	9.9%

Sutter	Cranston	44.3%
	Gann	45.2%
	Other	10.4%

Tehama	Cranston	54.2%
	Gann	37.6%
	Other	8.1%

Trinity	Cranston	53.2%
	Gann	36.2%
	Other	10.5%

Tulare	Cranston	55.4%
	Gann	39.4%
	Other	5.2%

Tuolumne	Cranston	52.2%
	Gann	40.6%
	Other	7.2%

Ventura	Cranston	48.6%
	Gann	45.0%
	Other	6.4%

Yolo	Cranston	63.5%
	Gann	27.4%
	Other	9.1%

Yuba	Cranston	48.6%
	Gann	42.4%
	Other	9.0%

National DataGraph for 1980 - California Results for 1980

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved