Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-12-05

Map

Map

Adams	Happ	44.5%
	Schimel	52.0%
	Other	3.5%

Ashland	Happ	62.5%
	Schimel	34.7%
	Other	2.8%

Barron	Happ	41.1%
	Schimel	55.7%
	Other	3.2%

Bayfield	Happ	60.5%
	Schimel	36.7%
	Other	2.8%

Brown	Happ	40.1%
	Schimel	56.5%
	Other	3.4%

Buffalo	Happ	40.9%
	Schimel	56.1%
	Other	3.0%

Burnett	Happ	41.3%
	Schimel	56.0%
	Other	2.7%

Calumet	Happ	33.5%
	Schimel	62.9%
	Other	3.6%

Chippewa	Happ	39.6%
	Schimel	57.2%
	Other	3.2%

Clark	Happ	34.4%
	Schimel	62.6%
	Other	3.0%

Columbia	Happ	48.9%
	Schimel	47.8%
	Other	3.3%

Crawford	Happ	49.0%
	Schimel	46.4%
	Other	4.6%

Dane	Happ	67.3%
	Schimel	29.9%
	Other	2.8%

Dodge	Happ	34.3%
	Schimel	63.0%
	Other	2.7%

Door	Happ	45.2%
	Schimel	51.7%
	Other	3.1%

Douglas	Happ	61.4%
	Schimel	35.8%
	Other	2.8%

Dunn	Happ	43.7%
	Schimel	52.2%
	Other	4.0%

Eau Claire	Happ	47.2%
	Schimel	49.1%
	Other	3.7%

Florence	Happ	31.6%
	Schimel	65.3%
	Other	3.1%

Fond du Lac	Happ	34.3%
	Schimel	62.7%
	Other	3.0%

Forest	Happ	41.4%
	Schimel	55.2%
	Other	3.4%

Grant	Happ	46.8%
	Schimel	49.0%
	Other	4.2%

Green	Happ	50.4%
	Schimel	46.5%
	Other	3.1%

Green Lake	Happ	31.0%
	Schimel	65.9%
	Other	3.1%

Iowa	Happ	54.2%
	Schimel	41.7%
	Other	4.1%

Iron	Happ	40.2%
	Schimel	56.6%
	Other	3.2%

Jackson	Happ	46.2%
	Schimel	50.4%
	Other	3.4%

Jefferson	Happ	40.8%
	Schimel	56.5%
	Other	2.8%

Juneau	Happ	43.7%
	Schimel	52.6%
	Other	3.6%

Kenosha	Happ	47.7%
	Schimel	49.2%
	Other	3.2%

Kewaunee	Happ	38.2%
	Schimel	59.0%
	Other	2.8%

La Crosse	Happ	50.2%
	Schimel	46.4%
	Other	3.4%

Lafayette	Happ	46.8%
	Schimel	49.8%
	Other	3.4%

Langlade	Happ	33.8%
	Schimel	63.8%
	Other	2.4%

Lincoln	Happ	38.5%
	Schimel	58.1%
	Other	3.4%

Manitowoc	Happ	38.0%
	Schimel	58.1%
	Other	3.9%

Marathon	Happ	36.1%
	Schimel	61.2%
	Other	2.7%

Marinette	Happ	38.4%
	Schimel	58.4%
	Other	3.2%

Marquette	Happ	41.3%
	Schimel	55.3%
	Other	3.4%

Menominee	Happ	72.0%
	Schimel	23.6%
	Other	4.3%

Milwaukee	Happ	61.3%
	Schimel	35.9%
	Other	2.8%

Monroe	Happ	39.6%
	Schimel	56.3%
	Other	4.0%

Oconto	Happ	35.6%
	Schimel	60.9%
	Other	3.6%

Oneida	Happ	38.8%
	Schimel	57.2%
	Other	4.0%

Outagamie	Happ	37.7%
	Schimel	56.4%
	Other	5.8%

Ozaukee	Happ	28.8%
	Schimel	69.1%
	Other	2.1%

Pepin	Happ	43.4%
	Schimel	53.4%
	Other	3.2%

Pierce	Happ	46.5%
	Schimel	49.9%
	Other	3.6%

Polk	Happ	41.0%
	Schimel	56.1%
	Other	2.9%

Portage	Happ	49.0%
	Schimel	47.7%
	Other	3.3%

Price	Happ	39.6%
	Schimel	57.2%
	Other	3.1%

Racine	Happ	43.6%
	Schimel	53.6%
	Other	2.7%

Richland	Happ	48.0%
	Schimel	48.2%
	Other	3.8%

Rock	Happ	54.9%
	Schimel	41.9%
	Other	3.2%

Rusk	Happ	37.8%
	Schimel	58.7%
	Other	3.6%

St. Croix	Happ	38.8%
	Schimel	57.3%
	Other	3.9%

Sauk	Happ	50.0%
	Schimel	46.7%
	Other	3.3%

Sawyer	Happ	43.7%
	Schimel	53.6%
	Other	2.8%

Shawano	Happ	33.5%
	Schimel	63.0%
	Other	3.5%

Sheboygan	Happ	35.8%
	Schimel	61.4%
	Other	2.9%

Taylor	Happ	29.3%
	Schimel	67.6%
	Other	3.1%

Trempealeau	Happ	45.8%
	Schimel	50.7%
	Other	3.5%

Vernon	Happ	47.7%
	Schimel	48.6%
	Other	3.8%

Vilas	Happ	34.9%
	Schimel	62.1%
	Other	3.0%

Walworth	Happ	33.9%
	Schimel	63.0%
	Other	3.1%

Washburn	Happ	43.5%
	Schimel	53.9%
	Other	2.6%

Washington	Happ	22.8%
	Schimel	75.1%
	Other	2.1%

Waukesha	Happ	25.2%
	Schimel	72.8%
	Other	2.0%

Waupaca	Happ	35.4%
	Schimel	61.3%
	Other	3.3%

Waushara	Happ	36.4%
	Schimel	60.1%
	Other	3.5%

Winnebago	Happ	42.7%
	Schimel	53.5%
	Other	3.8%

Wood	Happ	40.5%
	Schimel	56.1%
	Other	3.3%

National DataGraph for 2014 - Wisconsin Results for 2014

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved