Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-11-15

Map

Map

Arkansas	Inman	38.7%
	Martin	58.0%
	Other	3.3%

Ashley	Inman	38.1%
	Martin	59.4%
	Other	2.4%

Baxter	Inman	23.5%
	Martin	71.5%
	Other	5.0%

Benton	Inman	23.1%
	Martin	71.7%
	Other	5.2%

Boone	Inman	22.5%
	Martin	72.2%
	Other	5.3%

Bradley	Inman	40.2%
	Martin	57.1%
	Other	2.7%

Calhoun	Inman	34.8%
	Martin	61.7%
	Other	3.5%

Carroll	Inman	34.9%
	Martin	60.6%
	Other	4.5%

Chicot	Inman	60.4%
	Martin	37.7%
	Other	1.9%

Clark	Inman	47.6%
	Martin	49.2%
	Other	3.3%

Clay	Inman	33.9%
	Martin	61.8%
	Other	4.3%

Cleburne	Inman	22.4%
	Martin	73.5%
	Other	4.1%

Cleveland	Inman	30.7%
	Martin	65.6%
	Other	3.7%

Columbia	Inman	29.2%
	Martin	62.3%
	Other	8.5%

Conway	Inman	39.9%
	Martin	56.2%
	Other	3.9%

Craighead	Inman	29.6%
	Martin	65.4%
	Other	5.1%

Crawford	Inman	22.5%
	Martin	71.9%
	Other	5.6%

Crittenden	Inman	50.6%
	Martin	47.0%
	Other	2.4%

Cross	Inman	33.7%
	Martin	63.6%
	Other	2.7%

Dallas	Inman	45.2%
	Martin	52.2%
	Other	2.6%

Desha	Inman	56.1%
	Martin	41.4%
	Other	2.4%

Drew	Inman	40.2%
	Martin	56.9%
	Other	2.9%

Faulkner	Inman	31.6%
	Martin	64.2%
	Other	4.2%

Franklin	Inman	29.4%
	Martin	65.5%
	Other	5.1%

Fulton	Inman	32.9%
	Martin	62.9%
	Other	4.3%

Garland	Inman	30.9%
	Martin	65.0%
	Other	4.0%

Grant	Inman	27.9%
	Martin	67.6%
	Other	4.6%

Greene	Inman	26.5%
	Martin	68.9%
	Other	4.6%

Hempstead	Inman	37.4%
	Martin	60.2%
	Other	2.4%

Hot Spring	Inman	35.8%
	Martin	59.5%
	Other	4.7%

Howard	Inman	39.1%
	Martin	58.4%
	Other	2.5%

Independence	Inman	25.6%
	Martin	69.7%
	Other	4.6%

Izard	Inman	28.7%
	Martin	67.0%
	Other	4.4%

Jackson	Inman	36.5%
	Martin	59.0%
	Other	4.4%

Jefferson	Inman	60.6%
	Martin	37.0%
	Other	2.4%

Johnson	Inman	34.3%
	Martin	60.0%
	Other	5.7%

Lafayette	Inman	38.8%
	Martin	58.6%
	Other	2.5%

Lawrence	Inman	31.6%
	Martin	63.6%
	Other	4.9%

Lee	Inman	58.7%
	Martin	39.4%
	Other	1.9%

Lincoln	Inman	42.0%
	Martin	54.0%
	Other	4.0%

Little River	Inman	35.9%
	Martin	61.3%
	Other	2.8%

Logan	Inman	29.6%
	Martin	65.0%
	Other	5.4%

Lonoke	Inman	23.9%
	Martin	72.0%
	Other	4.1%

Madison	Inman	31.0%
	Martin	64.7%
	Other	4.2%

Marion	Inman	25.4%
	Martin	69.4%
	Other	5.2%

Miller	Inman	30.1%
	Martin	67.6%
	Other	2.3%

Mississippi	Inman	45.2%
	Martin	51.0%
	Other	3.8%

Monroe	Inman	49.3%
	Martin	48.5%
	Other	2.2%

Montgomery	Inman	27.7%
	Martin	67.6%
	Other	4.7%

Nevada	Inman	43.3%
	Martin	53.8%
	Other	2.9%

Newton	Inman	26.7%
	Martin	68.4%
	Other	4.9%

Ouachita	Inman	40.8%
	Martin	53.0%
	Other	6.1%

Perry	Inman	32.9%
	Martin	61.3%
	Other	5.7%

Phillips	Inman	59.8%
	Martin	36.2%
	Other	4.0%

Pike	Inman	29.4%
	Martin	67.0%
	Other	3.6%

Poinsett	Inman	31.5%
	Martin	64.3%
	Other	4.2%

Polk	Inman	21.7%
	Martin	73.5%
	Other	4.8%

Pope	Inman	23.5%
	Martin	72.0%
	Other	4.5%

Prairie	Inman	33.1%
	Martin	61.5%
	Other	5.4%

Pulaski	Inman	53.4%
	Martin	43.1%
	Other	3.5%

Randolph	Inman	32.5%
	Martin	62.4%
	Other	5.1%

St. Francis	Inman	56.7%
	Martin	40.7%
	Other	2.6%

Saline	Inman	27.3%
	Martin	68.1%
	Other	4.6%

Scott	Inman	25.0%
	Martin	69.7%
	Other	5.3%

Searcy	Inman	20.8%
	Martin	74.0%
	Other	5.2%

Sebastian	Inman	26.7%
	Martin	67.9%
	Other	5.4%

Sevier	Inman	31.4%
	Martin	65.8%
	Other	2.9%

Sharp	Inman	26.6%
	Martin	68.5%
	Other	5.0%

Stone	Inman	27.5%
	Martin	67.4%
	Other	5.1%

Union	Inman	33.3%
	Martin	61.2%
	Other	5.5%

Van Buren	Inman	30.1%
	Martin	64.7%
	Other	5.1%

Washington	Inman	34.9%
	Martin	59.8%
	Other	5.3%

White	Inman	21.3%
	Martin	74.4%
	Other	4.3%

Woodruff	Inman	52.9%
	Martin	42.7%
	Other	4.3%

Yell	Inman	33.6%
	Martin	62.7%
	Other	3.7%

National DataGraph for 2014 - Arkansas Results for 2014

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved