Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-01-14

Map

Map

Anderson	No	39.7%
	Yes	60.3%

Bedford	No	46.8%
	Yes	53.2%

Benton	No	40.5%
	Yes	59.5%

Bledsoe	No	42.9%
	Yes	57.1%

Blount	No	46.8%
	Yes	53.2%

Bradley	No	44.8%
	Yes	55.2%

Campbell	No	41.9%
	Yes	58.1%

Cannon	No	49.2%
	Yes	50.8%

Carroll	No	48.0%
	Yes	52.0%

Carter	No	50.1%
	Yes	49.9%

Cheatham	No	42.2%
	Yes	57.8%

Chester	No	58.7%
	Yes	41.3%

Claiborne	No	43.4%
	Yes	56.6%

Clay	No	39.5%
	Yes	60.5%

Cocke	No	38.4%
	Yes	61.6%

Coffee	No	41.2%
	Yes	58.8%

Crockett	No	55.4%
	Yes	44.6%

Cumberland	No	40.6%
	Yes	59.4%

Davidson	No	39.6%
	Yes	60.4%

Decatur	No	46.7%
	Yes	53.3%

DeKalb	No	51.6%
	Yes	48.4%

Dickson	No	42.8%
	Yes	57.2%

Dyer	No	49.8%
	Yes	50.2%

Fayette	No	47.3%
	Yes	52.7%

Fentress	No	46.7%
	Yes	53.3%

Franklin	No	40.7%
	Yes	59.3%

Gibson	No	55.7%
	Yes	44.3%

Giles	No	45.9%
	Yes	54.1%

Grainger	No	50.8%
	Yes	49.2%

Greene	No	46.1%
	Yes	53.9%

Grundy	No	40.7%
	Yes	59.3%

Hamblen	No	46.0%
	Yes	54.0%

Hamilton	No	35.8%
	Yes	64.2%

Hancock	No	57.4%
	Yes	42.6%

Hardeman	No	45.3%
	Yes	54.7%

Hardin	No	51.9%
	Yes	48.1%

Hawkins	No	52.8%
	Yes	47.2%

Haywood	No	49.5%
	Yes	50.5%

Henderson	No	53.2%
	Yes	46.8%

Henry	No	45.3%
	Yes	54.7%

Hickman	No	39.0%
	Yes	61.0%

Houston	No	37.0%
	Yes	63.0%

Humphreys	No	40.4%
	Yes	59.6%

Jackson	No	40.9%
	Yes	59.1%

Jefferson	No	47.4%
	Yes	52.6%

Johnson	No	48.4%
	Yes	51.6%

Knox	No	40.9%
	Yes	59.1%

Lake	No	48.5%
	Yes	51.5%

Lauderdale	No	46.8%
	Yes	53.2%

Lawrence	No	47.9%
	Yes	52.1%

Lewis	No	47.3%
	Yes	52.7%

Lincoln	No	49.0%
	Yes	51.0%

Loudon	No	41.3%
	Yes	58.7%

McMinn	No	44.8%
	Yes	55.2%

McNairy	No	54.8%
	Yes	45.2%

Macon	No	40.6%
	Yes	59.4%

Madison	No	52.9%
	Yes	47.1%

Marion	No	32.2%
	Yes	67.8%

Marshall	No	45.5%
	Yes	54.5%

Maury	No	44.6%
	Yes	55.4%

Meigs	No	36.2%
	Yes	63.8%

Monroe	No	47.3%
	Yes	52.7%

Montgomery	No	38.9%
	Yes	61.1%

Moore	No	43.1%
	Yes	56.9%

Morgan	No	43.3%
	Yes	56.7%

Obion	No	48.9%
	Yes	51.1%

Overton	No	41.4%
	Yes	58.6%

Perry	No	41.8%
	Yes	58.2%

Pickett	No	39.1%
	Yes	60.9%

Polk	No	36.0%
	Yes	64.0%

Putnam	No	47.9%
	Yes	52.1%

Rhea	No	44.3%
	Yes	55.7%

Roane	No	43.1%
	Yes	56.9%

Robertson	No	48.8%
	Yes	51.2%

Rutherford	No	44.3%
	Yes	55.7%

Scott	No	45.2%
	Yes	54.8%

Sequatchie	No	38.3%
	Yes	61.7%

Sevier	No	48.5%
	Yes	51.5%

Shelby	No	32.5%
	Yes	67.5%

Smith	No	43.3%
	Yes	56.7%

Stewart	No	37.1%
	Yes	62.9%

Sullivan	No	47.5%
	Yes	52.5%

Sumner	No	50.4%
	Yes	49.6%

Tipton	No	44.0%
	Yes	56.0%

Trousdale	No	38.6%
	Yes	61.4%

Unicoi	No	47.4%
	Yes	52.6%

Union	No	39.7%
	Yes	60.3%

Van Buren	No	37.7%
	Yes	62.3%

Warren	No	47.2%
	Yes	52.8%

Washington	No	47.4%
	Yes	52.6%

Wayne	No	50.5%
	Yes	49.5%

Weakley	No	51.7%
	Yes	48.3%

White	No	48.7%
	Yes	51.3%

Williamson	No	48.6%
	Yes	51.4%

Wilson	No	47.4%
	Yes	52.6%

National DataGraph for 2002 - Tennessee Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved