Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2011-01-13

Map

Map

Aurora	Nesselhuf	40.3%
	Gant	53.0%
	Other	6.7%

Beadle	Nesselhuf	44.5%
	Gant	49.7%
	Other	5.9%

Bennett	Nesselhuf	38.4%
	Gant	52.9%
	Other	8.7%

Bon Homme	Nesselhuf	43.1%
	Gant	50.5%
	Other	6.4%

Brookings	Nesselhuf	45.0%
	Gant	49.2%
	Other	5.8%

Brown	Nesselhuf	45.6%
	Gant	48.7%
	Other	5.7%

Brule	Nesselhuf	48.2%
	Gant	45.1%
	Other	6.7%

Buffalo	Nesselhuf	70.6%
	Gant	24.8%
	Other	4.6%

Butte	Nesselhuf	23.6%
	Gant	64.3%
	Other	12.0%

Campbell	Nesselhuf	21.7%
	Gant	72.8%
	Other	5.5%

Charles Mix	Nesselhuf	35.1%
	Gant	61.4%
	Other	3.5%

Clark	Nesselhuf	42.3%
	Gant	51.4%
	Other	6.4%

Clay	Nesselhuf	62.7%
	Gant	33.4%
	Other	3.9%

Codington	Nesselhuf	40.0%
	Gant	54.6%
	Other	5.4%

Corson	Nesselhuf	48.8%
	Gant	39.6%
	Other	11.5%

Custer	Nesselhuf	29.2%
	Gant	59.3%
	Other	11.5%

Davison	Nesselhuf	39.6%
	Gant	54.8%
	Other	5.6%

Day	Nesselhuf	52.9%
	Gant	41.2%
	Other	5.9%

Deuel	Nesselhuf	45.2%
	Gant	48.2%
	Other	6.6%

Dewey	Nesselhuf	61.3%
	Gant	31.1%
	Other	7.5%

Douglas	Nesselhuf	20.4%
	Gant	75.5%
	Other	4.1%

Edmunds	Nesselhuf	39.0%
	Gant	54.8%
	Other	6.2%

Fall River	Nesselhuf	28.7%
	Gant	59.5%
	Other	11.8%

Faulk	Nesselhuf	35.3%
	Gant	57.3%
	Other	7.4%

Grant	Nesselhuf	42.9%
	Gant	51.0%
	Other	6.1%

Gregory	Nesselhuf	37.0%
	Gant	56.4%
	Other	6.6%

Haakon	Nesselhuf	17.0%
	Gant	73.1%
	Other	9.9%

Hamlin	Nesselhuf	34.1%
	Gant	59.6%
	Other	6.2%

Hand	Nesselhuf	37.5%
	Gant	57.0%
	Other	5.6%

Hanson	Nesselhuf	32.0%
	Gant	61.7%
	Other	6.3%

Harding	Nesselhuf	15.9%
	Gant	73.4%
	Other	10.7%

Hughes	Nesselhuf	32.2%
	Gant	61.5%
	Other	6.2%

Hutchinson	Nesselhuf	30.7%
	Gant	63.4%
	Other	5.9%

Hyde	Nesselhuf	33.4%
	Gant	60.3%
	Other	6.3%

Jackson	Nesselhuf	30.6%
	Gant	59.0%
	Other	10.4%

Jerauld	Nesselhuf	44.6%
	Gant	46.9%
	Other	8.4%

Jones	Nesselhuf	24.3%
	Gant	68.1%
	Other	7.6%

Kingsbury	Nesselhuf	43.5%
	Gant	50.7%
	Other	5.7%

Lake	Nesselhuf	41.5%
	Gant	51.7%
	Other	6.7%

Lawrence	Nesselhuf	31.9%
	Gant	58.0%
	Other	10.1%

Lincoln	Nesselhuf	34.6%
	Gant	61.2%
	Other	4.2%

Lyman	Nesselhuf	41.7%
	Gant	51.3%
	Other	7.0%

McCook	Nesselhuf	40.6%
	Gant	52.7%
	Other	6.7%

McPherson	Nesselhuf	27.4%
	Gant	67.2%
	Other	5.4%

Marshall	Nesselhuf	52.6%
	Gant	42.7%
	Other	4.7%

Meade	Nesselhuf	24.9%
	Gant	64.7%
	Other	10.4%

Mellette	Nesselhuf	43.0%
	Gant	44.9%
	Other	12.1%

Miner	Nesselhuf	49.4%
	Gant	44.2%
	Other	6.4%

Minnehaha	Nesselhuf	42.4%
	Gant	52.1%
	Other	5.5%

Moody	Nesselhuf	49.8%
	Gant	43.5%
	Other	6.6%

Pennington	Nesselhuf	30.1%
	Gant	61.5%
	Other	8.4%

Perkins	Nesselhuf	23.0%
	Gant	63.4%
	Other	13.6%

Potter	Nesselhuf	30.5%
	Gant	64.4%
	Other	5.2%

Roberts	Nesselhuf	53.3%
	Gant	41.5%
	Other	5.2%

Sanborn	Nesselhuf	39.3%
	Gant	54.0%
	Other	6.7%

Shannon	Nesselhuf	81.4%
	Gant	10.5%
	Other	8.2%

Spink	Nesselhuf	45.6%
	Gant	49.7%
	Other	4.7%

Stanley	Nesselhuf	33.1%
	Gant	59.6%
	Other	7.3%

Sully	Nesselhuf	29.6%
	Gant	62.8%
	Other	7.6%

Todd	Nesselhuf	67.8%
	Gant	22.8%
	Other	9.4%

Tripp	Nesselhuf	33.1%
	Gant	61.9%
	Other	5.0%

Turner	Nesselhuf	47.5%
	Gant	46.8%
	Other	5.7%

Union	Nesselhuf	37.2%
	Gant	56.9%
	Other	5.9%

Walworth	Nesselhuf	29.4%
	Gant	64.0%
	Other	6.6%

Yankton	Nesselhuf	46.3%
	Gant	47.7%
	Other	6.0%

Ziebach	Nesselhuf	50.7%
	Gant	37.8%
	Other	11.6%

National DataGraph for 2010 - South Dakota Results for 2010

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved