Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Abbeville	Cunningham	29.0%
	McMaster	69.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Aiken	Cunningham	32.8%
	McMaster	65.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Allendale	Cunningham	67.8%
	McMaster	30.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Anderson	Cunningham	26.1%
	McMaster	72.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Bamberg	Cunningham	55.0%
	McMaster	43.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Barnwell	Cunningham	40.6%
	McMaster	58.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Beaufort	Cunningham	40.8%
	McMaster	58.3%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Berkeley	Cunningham	42.8%
	McMaster	55.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Calhoun	Cunningham	40.9%
	McMaster	57.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Charleston	Cunningham	55.7%
	McMaster	43.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Cherokee	Cunningham	22.8%
	McMaster	76.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Chester	Cunningham	38.6%
	McMaster	60.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Chesterfield	Cunningham	35.3%
	McMaster	63.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Clarendon	Cunningham	43.5%
	McMaster	55.6%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Colleton	Cunningham	41.8%
	McMaster	57.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Darlington	Cunningham	41.6%
	McMaster	57.6%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Dillon	Cunningham	44.3%
	McMaster	54.8%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Dorchester	Cunningham	43.7%
	McMaster	54.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Edgefield	Cunningham	31.7%
	McMaster	67.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Fairfield	Cunningham	54.9%
	McMaster	43.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Florence	Cunningham	43.9%
	McMaster	54.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Georgetown	Cunningham	39.6%
	McMaster	59.5%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Greenville	Cunningham	37.6%
	McMaster	60.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Greenwood	Cunningham	33.6%
	McMaster	65.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Hampton	Cunningham	51.6%
	McMaster	47.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Horry	Cunningham	29.8%
	McMaster	69.4%
		0.0%
	Other	0.9%

Jasper	Cunningham	42.7%
	McMaster	56.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Kershaw	Cunningham	36.0%
	McMaster	62.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Lancaster	Cunningham	33.7%
	McMaster	64.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Laurens	Cunningham	29.1%
	McMaster	69.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Lee	Cunningham	58.6%
	McMaster	40.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Lexington	Cunningham	33.9%
	McMaster	64.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

McCormick	Cunningham	38.5%
	McMaster	60.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Marion	Cunningham	53.3%
	McMaster	45.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Marlboro	Cunningham	49.7%
	McMaster	49.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Newberry	Cunningham	33.1%
	McMaster	65.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Oconee	Cunningham	24.1%
	McMaster	74.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Orangeburg	Cunningham	62.9%
	McMaster	36.3%
		0.0%
	Other	0.8%

Pickens	Cunningham	23.7%
	McMaster	74.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Richland	Cunningham	66.4%
	McMaster	32.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Saluda	Cunningham	27.2%
	McMaster	71.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Spartanburg	Cunningham	32.9%
	McMaster	65.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Sumter	Cunningham	52.3%
	McMaster	46.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Union	Cunningham	33.0%
	McMaster	66.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Williamsburg	Cunningham	59.6%
	McMaster	39.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

York	Cunningham	37.7%
	McMaster	60.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

National DataGraph for 2022 - South Carolina Results for 2022

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved