Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-06-10

Map

Map

Adams	Casey	41.3%
	Dwyer	56.4%
	Other	2.4%

Allegheny	Casey	55.5%
	Dwyer	41.4%
	Other	3.1%

Armstrong	Casey	50.9%
	Dwyer	47.1%
	Other	2.0%

Beaver	Casey	59.5%
	Dwyer	37.5%
	Other	3.0%

Bedford	Casey	39.1%
	Dwyer	59.6%
	Other	1.4%

Berks	Casey	50.0%
	Dwyer	47.9%
	Other	2.1%

Blair	Casey	41.7%
	Dwyer	56.3%
	Other	2.0%

Bradford	Casey	33.5%
	Dwyer	64.2%
	Other	2.3%

Bucks	Casey	41.5%
	Dwyer	56.2%
	Other	2.2%

Butler	Casey	43.4%
	Dwyer	54.0%
	Other	2.6%

Cambria	Casey	62.9%
	Dwyer	35.6%
	Other	1.5%

Cameron	Casey	43.2%
	Dwyer	55.0%
	Other	1.7%

Carbon	Casey	53.4%
	Dwyer	45.0%
	Other	1.5%

Centre	Casey	42.1%
	Dwyer	53.0%
	Other	5.0%

Chester	Casey	32.9%
	Dwyer	64.8%
	Other	2.3%

Clarion	Casey	44.6%
	Dwyer	53.2%
	Other	2.2%

Clearfield	Casey	49.0%
	Dwyer	49.6%
	Other	1.4%

Clinton	Casey	48.5%
	Dwyer	49.2%
	Other	2.2%

Columbia	Casey	51.3%
	Dwyer	46.9%
	Other	1.8%

Crawford	Casey	22.4%
	Dwyer	76.3%
	Other	1.2%

Cumberland	Casey	33.1%
	Dwyer	65.1%
	Other	1.7%

Dauphin	Casey	37.8%
	Dwyer	60.3%
	Other	1.9%

Delaware	Casey	39.6%
	Dwyer	58.7%
	Other	1.7%

Elk	Casey	56.0%
	Dwyer	42.6%
	Other	1.4%

Erie	Casey	41.0%
	Dwyer	56.8%
	Other	2.2%

Fayette	Casey	64.8%
	Dwyer	33.3%
	Other	1.9%

Forest	Casey	40.4%
	Dwyer	57.6%
	Other	1.9%

Franklin	Casey	41.0%
	Dwyer	57.1%
	Other	2.0%

Fulton	Casey	45.0%
	Dwyer	52.8%
	Other	2.2%

Greene	Casey	66.9%
	Dwyer	30.5%
	Other	2.5%

Huntingdon	Casey	40.8%
	Dwyer	57.0%
	Other	2.2%

Indiana	Casey	51.0%
	Dwyer	47.0%
	Other	2.1%

Jefferson	Casey	44.7%
	Dwyer	53.7%
	Other	1.6%

Juniata	Casey	42.9%
	Dwyer	56.1%
	Other	1.0%

Lackawanna	Casey	54.0%
	Dwyer	44.5%
	Other	1.5%

Lancaster	Casey	28.0%
	Dwyer	70.3%
	Other	1.7%

Lawrence	Casey	53.3%
	Dwyer	44.5%
	Other	2.2%

Lebanon	Casey	32.5%
	Dwyer	65.8%
	Other	1.7%

Lehigh	Casey	44.4%
	Dwyer	53.4%
	Other	2.2%

Luzerne	Casey	53.4%
	Dwyer	44.4%
	Other	2.2%

Lycoming	Casey	41.5%
	Dwyer	56.3%
	Other	2.2%

McKean	Casey	34.2%
	Dwyer	63.9%
	Other	1.8%

Mercer	Casey	31.8%
	Dwyer	66.4%
	Other	1.8%

Mifflin	Casey	40.4%
	Dwyer	57.8%
	Other	1.8%

Monroe	Casey	43.2%
	Dwyer	54.4%
	Other	2.5%

Montgomery	Casey	36.5%
	Dwyer	61.3%
	Other	2.1%

Montour	Casey	46.3%
	Dwyer	51.8%
	Other	1.9%

Northampton	Casey	49.9%
	Dwyer	47.5%
	Other	2.6%

Northumberland	Casey	47.7%
	Dwyer	50.1%
	Other	2.2%

Perry	Casey	35.1%
	Dwyer	63.0%
	Other	2.0%

Philadelphia	Casey	63.9%
	Dwyer	32.8%
	Other	3.3%

Pike	Casey	32.7%
	Dwyer	65.3%
	Other	2.0%

Potter	Casey	38.1%
	Dwyer	59.9%
	Other	2.0%

Schuylkill	Casey	46.9%
	Dwyer	51.0%
	Other	2.1%

Snyder	Casey	28.5%
	Dwyer	69.8%
	Other	1.8%

Somerset	Casey	47.7%
	Dwyer	51.0%
	Other	1.3%

Sullivan	Casey	45.7%
	Dwyer	53.0%
	Other	1.4%

Susquehanna	Casey	37.6%
	Dwyer	60.6%
	Other	1.8%

Tioga	Casey	32.4%
	Dwyer	65.5%
	Other	2.1%

Union	Casey	30.4%
	Dwyer	66.5%
	Other	3.1%

Venango	Casey	37.0%
	Dwyer	61.2%
	Other	1.8%

Warren	Casey	35.1%
	Dwyer	63.0%
	Other	1.9%

Washington	Casey	62.3%
	Dwyer	35.1%
	Other	2.6%

Wayne	Casey	30.2%
	Dwyer	68.2%
	Other	1.5%

Westmoreland	Casey	56.5%
	Dwyer	41.4%
	Other	2.1%

Wyoming	Casey	35.2%
	Dwyer	62.9%
	Other	1.9%

York	Casey	36.2%
	Dwyer	61.8%
	Other	1.9%

National DataGraph for 1980 - Pennsylvania Results for 1980

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved