Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-05-03

Map

Map

Adams	Wecht	30.2%
	Heinz	68.9%
	Other	0.9%

Allegheny	Wecht	37.7%
	Heinz	60.1%
	Other	2.2%

Armstrong	Wecht	40.6%
	Heinz	58.1%
	Other	1.3%

Beaver	Wecht	46.9%
	Heinz	51.8%
	Other	1.3%

Bedford	Wecht	31.5%
	Heinz	67.9%
	Other	0.5%

Berks	Wecht	34.2%
	Heinz	64.2%
	Other	1.7%

Blair	Wecht	27.9%
	Heinz	71.2%
	Other	1.0%

Bradford	Wecht	24.7%
	Heinz	74.4%
	Other	0.9%

Bucks	Wecht	33.8%
	Heinz	65.0%
	Other	1.2%

Butler	Wecht	34.9%
	Heinz	63.3%
	Other	1.8%

Cambria	Wecht	44.2%
	Heinz	55.1%
	Other	0.7%

Cameron	Wecht	39.1%
	Heinz	60.1%
	Other	0.8%

Carbon	Wecht	46.5%
	Heinz	52.3%
	Other	1.2%

Centre	Wecht	27.1%
	Heinz	70.2%
	Other	2.6%

Chester	Wecht	25.1%
	Heinz	73.7%
	Other	1.2%

Clarion	Wecht	34.0%
	Heinz	65.0%
	Other	1.0%

Clearfield	Wecht	40.8%
	Heinz	58.4%
	Other	0.9%

Clinton	Wecht	37.0%
	Heinz	61.4%
	Other	1.6%

Columbia	Wecht	39.1%
	Heinz	60.2%
	Other	0.6%

Crawford	Wecht	37.3%
	Heinz	61.3%
	Other	1.4%

Cumberland	Wecht	26.7%
	Heinz	72.2%
	Other	1.1%

Dauphin	Wecht	32.1%
	Heinz	66.2%
	Other	1.7%

Delaware	Wecht	30.3%
	Heinz	68.5%
	Other	1.2%

Elk	Wecht	40.9%
	Heinz	58.4%
	Other	0.7%

Erie	Wecht	41.8%
	Heinz	56.0%
	Other	2.1%

Fayette	Wecht	51.6%
	Heinz	47.1%
	Other	1.3%

Forest	Wecht	33.8%
	Heinz	65.3%
	Other	0.9%

Franklin	Wecht	33.3%
	Heinz	65.9%
	Other	0.9%

Fulton	Wecht	39.3%
	Heinz	59.9%
	Other	0.9%

Greene	Wecht	51.6%
	Heinz	47.5%
	Other	0.9%

Huntingdon	Wecht	26.8%
	Heinz	72.3%
	Other	0.9%

Indiana	Wecht	35.2%
	Heinz	63.7%
	Other	1.1%

Jefferson	Wecht	33.2%
	Heinz	66.0%
	Other	0.8%

Juniata	Wecht	36.0%
	Heinz	63.6%
	Other	0.5%

Lackawanna	Wecht	44.8%
	Heinz	53.9%
	Other	1.3%

Lancaster	Wecht	20.0%
	Heinz	79.0%
	Other	1.1%

Lawrence	Wecht	49.1%
	Heinz	49.6%
	Other	1.3%

Lebanon	Wecht	25.7%
	Heinz	72.2%
	Other	2.1%

Lehigh	Wecht	33.2%
	Heinz	65.4%
	Other	1.4%

Luzerne	Wecht	48.4%
	Heinz	50.6%
	Other	1.0%

Lycoming	Wecht	32.2%
	Heinz	66.6%
	Other	1.3%

McKean	Wecht	29.0%
	Heinz	69.3%
	Other	1.6%

Mercer	Wecht	43.8%
	Heinz	54.2%
	Other	2.0%

Mifflin	Wecht	29.7%
	Heinz	68.5%
	Other	1.8%

Monroe	Wecht	36.1%
	Heinz	62.5%
	Other	1.4%

Montgomery	Wecht	28.2%
	Heinz	70.7%
	Other	1.1%

Montour	Wecht	34.8%
	Heinz	64.4%
	Other	0.9%

Northampton	Wecht	42.1%
	Heinz	56.0%
	Other	1.9%

Northumberland	Wecht	45.1%
	Heinz	52.7%
	Other	2.2%

Perry	Wecht	27.2%
	Heinz	71.8%
	Other	1.0%

Philadelphia	Wecht	59.1%
	Heinz	39.0%
	Other	1.9%

Pike	Wecht	32.5%
	Heinz	65.4%
	Other	2.1%

Potter	Wecht	32.5%
	Heinz	65.8%
	Other	1.7%

Schuylkill	Wecht	41.0%
	Heinz	57.9%
	Other	1.0%

Snyder	Wecht	21.2%
	Heinz	78.1%
	Other	0.7%

Somerset	Wecht	36.7%
	Heinz	62.6%
	Other	0.7%

Sullivan	Wecht	37.7%
	Heinz	61.5%
	Other	0.8%

Susquehanna	Wecht	29.4%
	Heinz	69.4%
	Other	1.2%

Tioga	Wecht	27.5%
	Heinz	71.0%
	Other	1.5%

Union	Wecht	23.5%
	Heinz	74.9%
	Other	1.6%

Venango	Wecht	33.4%
	Heinz	65.8%
	Other	0.8%

Warren	Wecht	32.6%
	Heinz	66.1%
	Other	1.4%

Washington	Wecht	46.4%
	Heinz	52.6%
	Other	1.1%

Wayne	Wecht	25.4%
	Heinz	73.2%
	Other	1.4%

Westmoreland	Wecht	41.4%
	Heinz	56.9%
	Other	1.7%

Wyoming	Wecht	27.5%
	Heinz	71.8%
	Other	0.7%

York	Wecht	29.6%
	Heinz	69.1%
	Other	1.3%

National DataGraph for 1982 - Pennsylvania Results for 1982

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved