Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-12-23

Map

Map

Adams	DePasquale	33.0%
	Brown	60.4%
	Other	6.6%

Allegheny	DePasquale	62.2%
	Brown	32.7%
	Other	5.1%

Armstrong	DePasquale	35.5%
	Brown	58.4%
	Other	6.1%

Beaver	DePasquale	49.5%
	Brown	44.8%
	Other	5.7%

Bedford	DePasquale	22.5%
	Brown	71.7%
	Other	5.8%

Berks	DePasquale	42.3%
	Brown	52.0%
	Other	5.7%

Blair	DePasquale	31.2%
	Brown	63.3%
	Other	5.5%

Bradford	DePasquale	26.7%
	Brown	66.6%
	Other	6.7%

Bucks	DePasquale	46.3%
	Brown	50.4%
	Other	3.3%

Butler	DePasquale	34.6%
	Brown	59.5%
	Other	5.8%

Cambria	DePasquale	44.5%
	Brown	49.2%
	Other	6.3%

Cameron	DePasquale	31.8%
	Brown	61.2%
	Other	6.9%

Carbon	DePasquale	38.3%
	Brown	54.4%
	Other	7.3%

Centre	DePasquale	47.6%
	Brown	44.8%
	Other	7.6%

Chester	DePasquale	44.8%
	Brown	48.6%
	Other	6.5%

Clarion	DePasquale	33.1%
	Brown	60.8%
	Other	6.1%

Clearfield	DePasquale	33.6%
	Brown	60.4%
	Other	6.0%

Clinton	DePasquale	37.8%
	Brown	55.7%
	Other	6.5%

Columbia	DePasquale	38.4%
	Brown	54.8%
	Other	6.8%

Crawford	DePasquale	31.5%
	Brown	61.8%
	Other	6.7%

Cumberland	DePasquale	41.6%
	Brown	52.7%
	Other	5.8%

Dauphin	DePasquale	53.7%
	Brown	43.4%
	Other	2.9%

Delaware	DePasquale	54.8%
	Brown	42.3%
	Other	2.9%

Elk	DePasquale	38.5%
	Brown	55.3%
	Other	6.1%

Erie	DePasquale	49.1%
	Brown	43.6%
	Other	7.3%

Fayette	DePasquale	47.4%
	Brown	47.8%
	Other	4.7%

Forest	DePasquale	34.9%
	Brown	59.0%
	Other	6.1%

Franklin	DePasquale	26.2%
	Brown	67.2%
	Other	6.5%

Fulton	DePasquale	16.6%
	Brown	77.2%
	Other	6.2%

Greene	DePasquale	43.6%
	Brown	49.9%
	Other	6.4%

Huntingdon	DePasquale	29.1%
	Brown	64.6%
	Other	6.4%

Indiana	DePasquale	40.0%
	Brown	52.9%
	Other	7.2%

Jefferson	DePasquale	27.0%
	Brown	67.2%
	Other	5.7%

Juniata	DePasquale	26.4%
	Brown	67.3%
	Other	6.3%

Lackawanna	DePasquale	61.3%
	Brown	32.2%
	Other	6.5%

Lancaster	DePasquale	37.5%
	Brown	56.2%
	Other	6.3%

Lawrence	DePasquale	43.6%
	Brown	51.0%
	Other	5.5%

Lebanon	DePasquale	35.2%
	Brown	59.4%
	Other	5.5%

Lehigh	DePasquale	48.8%
	Brown	45.2%
	Other	6.0%

Luzerne	DePasquale	48.4%
	Brown	44.9%
	Other	6.7%

Lycoming	DePasquale	30.9%
	Brown	63.7%
	Other	5.5%

McKean	DePasquale	24.2%
	Brown	69.3%
	Other	6.5%

Mercer	DePasquale	38.9%
	Brown	54.9%
	Other	6.3%

Mifflin	DePasquale	25.4%
	Brown	68.3%
	Other	6.2%

Monroe	DePasquale	50.2%
	Brown	46.0%
	Other	3.9%

Montgomery	DePasquale	54.4%
	Brown	43.4%
	Other	2.2%

Montour	DePasquale	36.3%
	Brown	55.9%
	Other	7.8%

Northampton	DePasquale	46.3%
	Brown	50.2%
	Other	3.6%

Northumberland	DePasquale	33.5%
	Brown	57.8%
	Other	8.7%

Perry	DePasquale	30.4%
	Brown	63.2%
	Other	6.3%

Philadelphia	DePasquale	81.8%
	Brown	15.5%
	Other	2.6%

Pike	DePasquale	35.0%
	Brown	58.4%
	Other	6.6%

Potter	DePasquale	18.1%
	Brown	76.4%
	Other	5.5%

Schuylkill	DePasquale	34.7%
	Brown	58.1%
	Other	7.3%

Snyder	DePasquale	26.8%
	Brown	65.7%
	Other	7.5%

Somerset	DePasquale	31.0%
	Brown	64.0%
	Other	5.0%

Sullivan	DePasquale	31.5%
	Brown	62.3%
	Other	6.2%

Susquehanna	DePasquale	29.8%
	Brown	62.2%
	Other	8.0%

Tioga	DePasquale	21.0%
	Brown	72.1%
	Other	6.9%

Union	DePasquale	34.9%
	Brown	59.1%
	Other	6.0%

Venango	DePasquale	32.5%
	Brown	60.7%
	Other	6.8%

Warren	DePasquale	29.3%
	Brown	62.2%
	Other	8.5%

Washington	DePasquale	46.8%
	Brown	48.2%
	Other	5.0%

Wayne	DePasquale	32.2%
	Brown	60.3%
	Other	7.5%

Westmoreland	DePasquale	43.3%
	Brown	51.4%
	Other	5.3%

Wyoming	DePasquale	31.8%
	Brown	59.4%
	Other	8.8%

York	DePasquale	40.5%
	Brown	53.9%
	Other	5.5%

National DataGraph for 2016 - Pennsylvania Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved