Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2011-02-07

Map

Map

Adair	Covert	43.6%
	Miller	56.4%

Alfalfa	Covert	25.3%
	Miller	74.7%

Atoka	Covert	39.8%
	Miller	60.2%

Beaver	Covert	14.3%
	Miller	85.7%

Beckham	Covert	32.3%
	Miller	67.7%

Blaine	Covert	29.9%
	Miller	70.1%

Bryan	Covert	39.6%
	Miller	60.4%

Caddo	Covert	44.6%
	Miller	55.4%

Canadian	Covert	22.1%
	Miller	77.9%

Carter	Covert	33.1%
	Miller	66.9%

Cherokee	Covert	46.2%
	Miller	53.8%

Choctaw	Covert	43.9%
	Miller	56.1%

Cimarron	Covert	19.7%
	Miller	80.3%

Cleveland	Covert	34.1%
	Miller	65.9%

Coal	Covert	49.3%
	Miller	50.7%

Comanche	Covert	38.3%
	Miller	61.7%

Cotton	Covert	37.7%
	Miller	62.3%

Craig	Covert	40.2%
	Miller	59.8%

Creek	Covert	30.1%
	Miller	69.9%

Custer	Covert	27.9%
	Miller	72.1%

Delaware	Covert	32.0%
	Miller	68.0%

Dewey	Covert	26.1%
	Miller	73.9%

Ellis	Covert	20.2%
	Miller	79.8%

Garfield	Covert	25.4%
	Miller	74.6%

Garvin	Covert	38.5%
	Miller	61.5%

Grady	Covert	30.9%
	Miller	69.1%

Grant	Covert	26.5%
	Miller	73.5%

Greer	Covert	40.0%
	Miller	60.0%

Harmon	Covert	37.5%
	Miller	62.5%

Harper	Covert	21.2%
	Miller	78.8%

Haskell	Covert	41.5%
	Miller	58.5%

Hughes	Covert	45.0%
	Miller	55.0%

Jackson	Covert	27.7%
	Miller	72.3%

Jefferson	Covert	43.2%
	Miller	56.8%

Johnston	Covert	41.6%
	Miller	58.4%

Kay	Covert	30.9%
	Miller	69.1%

Kingfisher	Covert	19.5%
	Miller	80.5%

Kiowa	Covert	38.4%
	Miller	61.6%

Latimer	Covert	45.8%
	Miller	54.2%

Le Flore	Covert	43.5%
	Miller	56.5%

Lincoln	Covert	31.8%
	Miller	68.2%

Logan	Covert	25.9%
	Miller	74.1%

Love	Covert	39.2%
	Miller	60.8%

McClain	Covert	27.6%
	Miller	72.4%

McCurtain	Covert	39.1%
	Miller	60.9%

McIntosh	Covert	45.1%
	Miller	54.9%

Major	Covert	19.7%
	Miller	80.3%

Marshall	Covert	35.3%
	Miller	64.7%

Mayes	Covert	37.7%
	Miller	62.3%

Murray	Covert	39.6%
	Miller	60.4%

Muskogee	Covert	44.0%
	Miller	56.0%

Noble	Covert	28.0%
	Miller	72.0%

Nowata	Covert	36.4%
	Miller	63.6%

Okfuskee	Covert	43.7%
	Miller	56.3%

Oklahoma	Covert	35.2%
	Miller	64.8%

Okmulgee	Covert	44.2%
	Miller	55.8%

Osage	Covert	40.3%
	Miller	59.7%

Ottawa	Covert	39.7%
	Miller	60.3%

Pawnee	Covert	34.3%
	Miller	65.7%

Payne	Covert	33.6%
	Miller	66.4%

Pittsburg	Covert	42.2%
	Miller	57.8%

Pontotoc	Covert	38.5%
	Miller	61.5%

Pottawatomie	Covert	34.1%
	Miller	65.9%

Pushmataha	Covert	42.8%
	Miller	57.2%

Roger Mills	Covert	26.9%
	Miller	73.1%

Rogers	Covert	27.2%
	Miller	72.8%

Seminole	Covert	40.4%
	Miller	59.6%

Sequoyah	Covert	40.7%
	Miller	59.3%

Stephens	Covert	32.4%
	Miller	67.6%

Texas	Covert	15.8%
	Miller	84.2%

Tillman	Covert	40.2%
	Miller	59.8%

Tulsa	Covert	30.4%
	Miller	69.6%

Wagoner	Covert	28.0%
	Miller	72.0%

Washington	Covert	24.9%
	Miller	75.1%

Washita	Covert	31.3%
	Miller	68.7%

Woods	Covert	28.0%
	Miller	72.0%

Woodward	Covert	20.6%
	Miller	79.4%

National DataGraph for 2010 - Oklahoma Results for 2010

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved