Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-07-10

Map

Map

Adair	Bernard	64.8%
	Lamb	35.2%

Alfalfa	Bernard	40.2%
	Lamb	59.8%

Atoka	Bernard	84.7%
	Lamb	15.3%

Beaver	Bernard	50.4%
	Lamb	49.6%

Beckham	Bernard	71.4%
	Lamb	28.6%

Blaine	Bernard	52.9%
	Lamb	47.1%

Bryan	Bernard	83.7%
	Lamb	16.3%

Caddo	Bernard	75.4%
	Lamb	24.6%

Canadian	Bernard	55.3%
	Lamb	44.7%

Carter	Bernard	71.7%
	Lamb	28.3%

Cherokee	Bernard	69.2%
	Lamb	30.8%

Choctaw	Bernard	81.8%
	Lamb	18.2%

Cimarron	Bernard	56.5%
	Lamb	43.5%

Cleveland	Bernard	56.8%
	Lamb	43.2%

Coal	Bernard	84.6%
	Lamb	15.4%

Comanche	Bernard	73.1%
	Lamb	26.9%

Cotton	Bernard	79.9%
	Lamb	20.1%

Craig	Bernard	75.0%
	Lamb	25.0%

Creek	Bernard	63.7%
	Lamb	36.3%

Custer	Bernard	62.3%
	Lamb	37.7%

Delaware	Bernard	68.7%
	Lamb	31.3%

Dewey	Bernard	63.4%
	Lamb	36.6%

Ellis	Bernard	57.2%
	Lamb	42.8%

Garfield	Bernard	42.7%
	Lamb	57.3%

Garvin	Bernard	77.2%
	Lamb	22.8%

Grady	Bernard	76.7%
	Lamb	23.3%

Grant	Bernard	41.3%
	Lamb	58.7%

Greer	Bernard	79.0%
	Lamb	21.0%

Harmon	Bernard	85.5%
	Lamb	14.5%

Harper	Bernard	54.2%
	Lamb	45.8%

Haskell	Bernard	80.2%
	Lamb	19.8%

Hughes	Bernard	81.0%
	Lamb	19.0%

Jackson	Bernard	77.7%
	Lamb	22.3%

Jefferson	Bernard	81.9%
	Lamb	18.1%

Johnston	Bernard	83.8%
	Lamb	16.2%

Kay	Bernard	53.9%
	Lamb	46.1%

Kingfisher	Bernard	47.0%
	Lamb	53.0%

Kiowa	Bernard	75.0%
	Lamb	25.0%

Latimer	Bernard	79.2%
	Lamb	20.8%

Le Flore	Bernard	79.8%
	Lamb	20.2%

Lincoln	Bernard	60.9%
	Lamb	39.1%

Logan	Bernard	55.7%
	Lamb	44.3%

Love	Bernard	85.9%
	Lamb	14.1%

McClain	Bernard	69.2%
	Lamb	30.8%

McCurtain	Bernard	75.7%
	Lamb	24.3%

McIntosh	Bernard	74.9%
	Lamb	25.1%

Major	Bernard	34.8%
	Lamb	65.2%

Marshall	Bernard	82.9%
	Lamb	17.1%

Mayes	Bernard	68.8%
	Lamb	31.2%

Murray	Bernard	78.3%
	Lamb	21.7%

Muskogee	Bernard	69.2%
	Lamb	30.8%

Noble	Bernard	54.1%
	Lamb	45.9%

Nowata	Bernard	68.4%
	Lamb	31.6%

Okfuskee	Bernard	73.7%
	Lamb	26.3%

Oklahoma	Bernard	54.1%
	Lamb	45.9%

Okmulgee	Bernard	73.3%
	Lamb	26.7%

Osage	Bernard	66.6%
	Lamb	33.4%

Ottawa	Bernard	74.5%
	Lamb	25.5%

Pawnee	Bernard	58.5%
	Lamb	41.5%

Payne	Bernard	55.9%
	Lamb	44.1%

Pittsburg	Bernard	79.3%
	Lamb	20.7%

Pontotoc	Bernard	73.1%
	Lamb	26.9%

Pottawatomie	Bernard	68.3%
	Lamb	31.7%

Pushmataha	Bernard	83.0%
	Lamb	17.0%

Roger Mills	Bernard	69.2%
	Lamb	30.8%

Rogers	Bernard	61.6%
	Lamb	38.4%

Seminole	Bernard	76.6%
	Lamb	23.4%

Sequoyah	Bernard	76.6%
	Lamb	23.4%

Stephens	Bernard	75.7%
	Lamb	24.3%

Texas	Bernard	55.8%
	Lamb	44.2%

Tillman	Bernard	78.4%
	Lamb	21.6%

Tulsa	Bernard	50.8%
	Lamb	49.2%

Wagoner	Bernard	60.3%
	Lamb	39.7%

Washington	Bernard	48.9%
	Lamb	51.1%

Washita	Bernard	67.9%
	Lamb	32.1%

Woods	Bernard	50.9%
	Lamb	49.1%

Woodward	Bernard	53.9%
	Lamb	46.1%

National DataGraph for 1982 - Oklahoma Results for 1982

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved