Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2024-05-27

Map

Map

Adair	Nigh	53.0%
	Wootten	46.6%
	Other	0.5%

Alfalfa	Nigh	35.5%
	Wootten	64.3%
	Other	0.1%

Atoka	Nigh	62.1%
	Wootten	37.1%
	Other	0.8%

Beaver	Nigh	46.2%
	Wootten	53.4%
	Other	0.4%

Beckham	Nigh	53.7%
	Wootten	45.9%
	Other	0.3%

Blaine	Nigh	39.6%
	Wootten	60.0%
	Other	0.4%

Bryan	Nigh	74.3%
	Wootten	25.5%
	Other	0.2%

Caddo	Nigh	56.8%
	Wootten	42.8%
	Other	0.4%

Canadian	Nigh	47.3%
	Wootten	52.3%
	Other	0.4%

Carter	Nigh	65.1%
	Wootten	34.5%
	Other	0.3%

Cherokee	Nigh	58.2%
	Wootten	41.6%
	Other	0.3%

Choctaw	Nigh	71.7%
	Wootten	27.9%
	Other	0.4%

Cimarron	Nigh	39.0%
	Wootten	60.7%
	Other	0.3%

Cleveland	Nigh	51.4%
	Wootten	48.4%
	Other	0.3%

Coal	Nigh	66.0%
	Wootten	33.6%
	Other	0.5%

Comanche	Nigh	63.4%
	Wootten	36.2%
	Other	0.4%

Cotton	Nigh	65.9%
	Wootten	33.9%
	Other	0.3%

Craig	Nigh	55.9%
	Wootten	43.9%
	Other	0.1%

Creek	Nigh	55.2%
	Wootten	44.4%
	Other	0.5%

Custer	Nigh	49.7%
	Wootten	50.1%
	Other	0.2%

Delaware	Nigh	51.5%
	Wootten	48.2%
	Other	0.3%

Dewey	Nigh	50.9%
	Wootten	48.6%
	Other	0.5%

Ellis	Nigh	43.5%
	Wootten	56.1%
	Other	0.4%

Garfield	Nigh	38.0%
	Wootten	61.8%
	Other	0.2%

Garvin	Nigh	61.6%
	Wootten	37.1%
	Other	1.2%

Grady	Nigh	60.6%
	Wootten	39.1%
	Other	0.3%

Grant	Nigh	43.5%
	Wootten	56.3%
	Other	0.2%

Greer	Nigh	64.2%
	Wootten	35.4%
	Other	0.4%

Harmon	Nigh	68.9%
	Wootten	30.6%
	Other	0.6%

Harper	Nigh	46.6%
	Wootten	53.2%
	Other	0.2%

Haskell	Nigh	68.9%
	Wootten	30.8%
	Other	0.3%

Hughes	Nigh	66.8%
	Wootten	32.7%
	Other	0.5%

Jackson	Nigh	69.4%
	Wootten	30.3%
	Other	0.4%

Jefferson	Nigh	75.8%
	Wootten	23.9%
	Other	0.3%

Johnston	Nigh	66.2%
	Wootten	33.6%
	Other	0.3%

Kay	Nigh	42.6%
	Wootten	57.2%
	Other	0.2%

Kingfisher	Nigh	37.1%
	Wootten	62.8%
	Other	0.2%

Kiowa	Nigh	57.3%
	Wootten	42.6%
	Other	0.1%

Latimer	Nigh	71.3%
	Wootten	28.4%
	Other	0.3%

Le Flore	Nigh	69.4%
	Wootten	30.2%
	Other	0.4%

Lincoln	Nigh	49.1%
	Wootten	50.6%
	Other	0.4%

Logan	Nigh	48.7%
	Wootten	50.8%
	Other	0.5%

Love	Nigh	72.8%
	Wootten	27.0%
	Other	0.1%

McClain	Nigh	61.5%
	Wootten	38.1%
	Other	0.3%

McCurtain	Nigh	70.1%
	Wootten	29.4%
	Other	0.5%

McIntosh	Nigh	66.3%
	Wootten	33.3%
	Other	0.4%

Major	Nigh	29.3%
	Wootten	70.3%
	Other	0.3%

Marshall	Nigh	60.5%
	Wootten	39.1%
	Other	0.4%

Mayes	Nigh	54.8%
	Wootten	45.1%
	Other	0.1%

Murray	Nigh	65.6%
	Wootten	34.1%
	Other	0.4%

Muskogee	Nigh	62.4%
	Wootten	37.4%
	Other	0.2%

Noble	Nigh	46.4%
	Wootten	53.4%
	Other	0.2%

Nowata	Nigh	55.8%
	Wootten	44.1%
	Other	0.1%

Okfuskee	Nigh	55.7%
	Wootten	43.9%
	Other	0.4%

Oklahoma	Nigh	46.6%
	Wootten	52.5%
	Other	0.9%

Okmulgee	Nigh	62.0%
	Wootten	37.7%
	Other	0.3%

Osage	Nigh	52.6%
	Wootten	47.1%
	Other	0.3%

Ottawa	Nigh	59.8%
	Wootten	40.0%
	Other	0.2%

Pawnee	Nigh	46.1%
	Wootten	53.5%
	Other	0.3%

Payne	Nigh	47.5%
	Wootten	52.3%
	Other	0.2%

Pittsburg	Nigh	76.2%
	Wootten	23.4%
	Other	0.3%

Pontotoc	Nigh	62.0%
	Wootten	37.8%
	Other	0.3%

Pottawatomie	Nigh	56.5%
	Wootten	43.2%
	Other	0.2%

Pushmataha	Nigh	68.5%
	Wootten	30.9%
	Other	0.6%

Roger Mills	Nigh	53.5%
	Wootten	46.1%
	Other	0.4%

Rogers	Nigh	52.7%
	Wootten	46.8%
	Other	0.6%

Seminole	Nigh	61.2%
	Wootten	38.6%
	Other	0.2%

Sequoyah	Nigh	67.0%
	Wootten	32.6%
	Other	0.4%

Stephens	Nigh	58.4%
	Wootten	41.3%
	Other	0.3%

Texas	Nigh	50.6%
	Wootten	49.0%
	Other	0.4%

Tillman	Nigh	66.5%
	Wootten	32.9%
	Other	0.6%

Tulsa	Nigh	40.9%
	Wootten	58.1%
	Other	1.1%

Wagoner	Nigh	51.6%
	Wootten	48.0%
	Other	0.3%

Washington	Nigh	38.3%
	Wootten	61.4%
	Other	0.3%

Washita	Nigh	56.8%
	Wootten	42.8%
	Other	0.3%

Woods	Nigh	44.3%
	Wootten	55.3%
	Other	0.4%

Woodward	Nigh	45.7%
	Wootten	53.8%
	Other	0.5%

National DataGraph for 1966 - Oklahoma Results for 1966

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved