Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-07-10

Map

Map

Adair	Nigh	54.0%
	Stotts	43.7%
	Other	2.3%

Alfalfa	Nigh	37.9%
	Stotts	61.5%
	Other	0.6%

Atoka	Nigh	67.8%
	Stotts	31.3%
	Other	0.9%

Beaver	Nigh	45.9%
	Stotts	53.3%
	Other	0.8%

Beckham	Nigh	48.6%
	Stotts	51.0%
	Other	0.4%

Blaine	Nigh	33.2%
	Stotts	66.4%
	Other	0.3%

Bryan	Nigh	75.3%
	Stotts	24.2%
	Other	0.5%

Caddo	Nigh	53.6%
	Stotts	45.7%
	Other	0.7%

Canadian	Nigh	39.9%
	Stotts	59.3%
	Other	0.8%

Carter	Nigh	56.0%
	Stotts	43.4%
	Other	0.6%

Cherokee	Nigh	63.9%
	Stotts	35.5%
	Other	0.6%

Choctaw	Nigh	73.4%
	Stotts	25.1%
	Other	1.5%

Cimarron	Nigh	45.2%
	Stotts	51.9%
	Other	3.0%

Cleveland	Nigh	45.1%
	Stotts	53.9%
	Other	1.0%

Coal	Nigh	68.9%
	Stotts	30.2%
	Other	0.9%

Comanche	Nigh	64.8%
	Stotts	34.8%
	Other	0.5%

Cotton	Nigh	62.2%
	Stotts	37.0%
	Other	0.7%

Craig	Nigh	67.4%
	Stotts	31.8%
	Other	0.8%

Creek	Nigh	59.0%
	Stotts	40.4%
	Other	0.7%

Custer	Nigh	41.6%
	Stotts	58.0%
	Other	0.4%

Delaware	Nigh	65.9%
	Stotts	33.1%
	Other	1.0%

Dewey	Nigh	40.8%
	Stotts	58.6%
	Other	0.6%

Ellis	Nigh	37.8%
	Stotts	60.3%
	Other	1.9%

Garfield	Nigh	38.6%
	Stotts	60.7%
	Other	0.6%

Garvin	Nigh	57.1%
	Stotts	42.3%
	Other	0.6%

Grady	Nigh	54.5%
	Stotts	45.0%
	Other	0.5%

Grant	Nigh	48.7%
	Stotts	50.4%
	Other	0.8%

Greer	Nigh	55.3%
	Stotts	44.3%
	Other	0.4%

Harmon	Nigh	68.6%
	Stotts	30.9%
	Other	0.5%

Harper	Nigh	37.2%
	Stotts	61.9%
	Other	0.9%

Haskell	Nigh	69.6%
	Stotts	29.7%
	Other	0.7%

Hughes	Nigh	64.6%
	Stotts	34.4%
	Other	1.0%

Jackson	Nigh	64.2%
	Stotts	35.0%
	Other	0.8%

Jefferson	Nigh	69.2%
	Stotts	30.5%
	Other	0.4%

Johnston	Nigh	63.7%
	Stotts	35.8%
	Other	0.5%

Kay	Nigh	43.3%
	Stotts	56.0%
	Other	0.7%

Kingfisher	Nigh	37.6%
	Stotts	61.6%
	Other	0.9%

Kiowa	Nigh	54.2%
	Stotts	45.4%
	Other	0.4%

Latimer	Nigh	71.3%
	Stotts	27.8%
	Other	0.9%

Le Flore	Nigh	76.5%
	Stotts	22.8%
	Other	0.7%

Lincoln	Nigh	48.2%
	Stotts	51.2%
	Other	0.6%

Logan	Nigh	46.6%
	Stotts	52.5%
	Other	0.9%

Love	Nigh	68.9%
	Stotts	30.4%
	Other	0.7%

McClain	Nigh	54.5%
	Stotts	44.4%
	Other	1.1%

McCurtain	Nigh	75.5%
	Stotts	23.2%
	Other	1.4%

McIntosh	Nigh	65.9%
	Stotts	33.5%
	Other	0.6%

Major	Nigh	29.8%
	Stotts	69.8%
	Other	0.5%

Marshall	Nigh	57.3%
	Stotts	42.0%
	Other	0.7%

Mayes	Nigh	59.2%
	Stotts	40.3%
	Other	0.5%

Murray	Nigh	61.6%
	Stotts	38.0%
	Other	0.5%

Muskogee	Nigh	65.6%
	Stotts	33.7%
	Other	0.6%

Noble	Nigh	40.1%
	Stotts	59.4%
	Other	0.5%

Nowata	Nigh	53.5%
	Stotts	46.0%
	Other	0.4%

Okfuskee	Nigh	56.7%
	Stotts	42.6%
	Other	0.8%

Oklahoma	Nigh	41.4%
	Stotts	56.1%
	Other	2.5%

Okmulgee	Nigh	68.5%
	Stotts	31.0%
	Other	0.5%

Osage	Nigh	58.7%
	Stotts	40.8%
	Other	0.5%

Ottawa	Nigh	67.7%
	Stotts	31.8%
	Other	0.5%

Pawnee	Nigh	54.6%
	Stotts	44.6%
	Other	0.8%

Payne	Nigh	50.1%
	Stotts	49.2%
	Other	0.7%

Pittsburg	Nigh	70.5%
	Stotts	28.8%
	Other	0.6%

Pontotoc	Nigh	56.4%
	Stotts	42.8%
	Other	0.8%

Pottawatomie	Nigh	56.6%
	Stotts	42.8%
	Other	0.5%

Pushmataha	Nigh	66.7%
	Stotts	31.7%
	Other	1.6%

Roger Mills	Nigh	48.6%
	Stotts	50.7%
	Other	0.7%

Rogers	Nigh	58.3%
	Stotts	41.1%
	Other	0.6%

Seminole	Nigh	59.8%
	Stotts	39.6%
	Other	0.6%

Sequoyah	Nigh	72.0%
	Stotts	27.1%
	Other	0.9%

Stephens	Nigh	56.4%
	Stotts	43.2%
	Other	0.4%

Texas	Nigh	56.8%
	Stotts	42.2%
	Other	1.0%

Tillman	Nigh	63.0%
	Stotts	36.3%
	Other	0.7%

Tulsa	Nigh	48.0%
	Stotts	51.2%
	Other	0.8%

Wagoner	Nigh	57.9%
	Stotts	41.6%
	Other	0.5%

Washington	Nigh	45.5%
	Stotts	54.1%
	Other	0.4%

Washita	Nigh	42.4%
	Stotts	56.0%
	Other	1.5%

Woods	Nigh	37.8%
	Stotts	61.9%
	Other	0.3%

Woodward	Nigh	34.5%
	Stotts	64.4%
	Other	1.1%

National DataGraph for 1978 - Oklahoma Results for 1978

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved