2016 Attorney General General Election Data Graphs - North Carolina
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-12-05

Map

AlamanceStein45.8%
 
Newton54.2%
 


AlexanderStein29.8%
 
Newton70.2%
 


AlleghanyStein34.0%
 
Newton66.0%
 


AnsonStein61.8%
 
Newton38.2%
 


AsheStein34.5%
 
Newton65.5%
 


AveryStein25.8%
 
Newton74.2%
 


BeaufortStein40.2%
 
Newton59.8%
 


BertieStein64.4%
 
Newton35.6%
 


BladenStein51.9%
 
Newton48.1%
 


BrunswickStein39.9%
 
Newton60.1%
 


BuncombeStein59.9%
 
Newton40.1%
 


BurkeStein36.8%
 
Newton63.2%
 


CabarrusStein42.4%
 
Newton57.6%
 


CaldwellStein31.4%
 
Newton68.6%
 


CamdenStein29.6%
 
Newton70.4%
 


CarteretStein29.1%
 
Newton70.9%
 


CaswellStein47.0%
 
Newton53.0%
 


CatawbaStein35.0%
 
Newton65.0%
 


ChathamStein56.4%
 
Newton43.6%
 


CherokeeStein26.0%
 
Newton74.0%
 


ChowanStein46.3%
 
Newton53.7%
 


ClayStein27.9%
 
Newton72.1%
 


ClevelandStein39.6%
 
Newton60.4%
 


ColumbusStein46.9%
 
Newton53.1%
 


CravenStein40.7%
 
Newton59.3%
 


CumberlandStein59.5%
 
Newton40.5%
 


CurrituckStein26.8%
 
Newton73.2%
 


DareStein41.7%
 
Newton58.3%
 


DavidsonStein29.1%
 
Newton70.9%
 


DavieStein29.1%
 
Newton70.9%
 


DuplinStein43.8%
 
Newton56.2%
 


DurhamStein79.6%
 
Newton20.4%
 


EdgecombeStein67.9%
 
Newton32.1%
 


ForsythStein56.3%
 
Newton43.7%
 


FranklinStein47.8%
 
Newton52.2%
 


GastonStein37.2%
 
Newton62.8%
 


GatesStein48.7%
 
Newton51.3%
 


GrahamStein27.3%
 
Newton72.7%
 


GranvilleStein52.2%
 
Newton47.8%
 


GreeneStein48.4%
 
Newton51.6%
 


GuilfordStein60.9%
 
Newton39.1%
 


HalifaxStein66.1%
 
Newton33.9%
 


HarnettStein41.2%
 
Newton58.8%
 


HaywoodStein41.7%
 
Newton58.3%
 


HendersonStein37.3%
 
Newton62.7%
 


HertfordStein70.7%
 
Newton29.3%
 


HokeStein57.7%
 
Newton42.3%
 


HydeStein48.5%
 
Newton51.5%
 


IredellStein35.1%
 
Newton64.9%
 


JacksonStein48.4%
 
Newton51.6%
 


JohnstonStein37.7%
 
Newton62.3%
 


JonesStein44.0%
 
Newton56.0%
 


LeeStein47.8%
 
Newton52.2%
 


LenoirStein50.8%
 
Newton49.2%
 


LincolnStein30.8%
 
Newton69.2%
 


McDowellStein31.1%
 
Newton68.9%
 


MaconStein33.3%
 
Newton66.7%
 


MadisonStein45.0%
 
Newton55.0%
 


MartinStein53.7%
 
Newton46.3%
 


MecklenburgStein63.9%
 
Newton36.1%
 


MitchellStein24.1%
 
Newton75.9%
 


MontgomeryStein41.9%
 
Newton58.1%
 


MooreStein36.8%
 
Newton63.2%
 


NashStein51.3%
 
Newton48.7%
 


New HanoverStein50.9%
 
Newton49.1%
 


NorthamptonStein65.8%
 
Newton34.2%
 


OnslowStein34.9%
 
Newton65.1%
 


OrangeStein74.7%
 
Newton25.3%
 


PamlicoStein37.6%
 
Newton62.4%
 


PasquotankStein53.4%
 
Newton46.6%
 


PenderStein38.5%
 
Newton61.5%
 


PerquimansStein38.3%
 
Newton61.7%
 


PersonStein46.4%
 
Newton53.6%
 


PittStein54.5%
 
Newton45.5%
 


PolkStein38.7%
 
Newton61.3%
 


RandolphStein25.2%
 
Newton74.8%
 


RichmondStein52.3%
 
Newton47.7%
 


RobesonStein55.9%
 
Newton44.1%
 


RockinghamStein39.5%
 
Newton60.5%
 


RowanStein36.6%
 
Newton63.4%
 


RutherfordStein30.1%
 
Newton69.9%
 


SampsonStein44.0%
 
Newton56.0%
 


ScotlandStein56.5%
 
Newton43.5%
 


StanlyStein30.4%
 
Newton69.6%
 


StokesStein27.6%
 
Newton72.4%
 


SurryStein30.2%
 
Newton69.8%
 


SwainStein45.8%
 
Newton54.2%
 


TransylvaniaStein41.7%
 
Newton58.3%
 


TyrrellStein48.4%
 
Newton51.6%
 


UnionStein35.4%
 
Newton64.6%
 


VanceStein65.7%
 
Newton34.3%
 


WakeStein60.3%
 
Newton39.7%
 


WarrenStein68.5%
 
Newton31.5%
 


WashingtonStein60.9%
 
Newton39.1%
 


WataugaStein53.0%
 
Newton47.0%
 


WayneStein46.4%
 
Newton53.6%
 


WilkesStein27.6%
 
Newton72.4%
 


WilsonStein53.9%
 
Newton46.1%
 


YadkinStein23.6%
 
Newton76.4%
 


YanceyStein41.6%
 
Newton58.4%
 



National DataGraph for 2016 - North Carolina Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved