2012 State Treasurer General Election Data Graphs - North Carolina
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2012-11-17

Map

AlamanceCowell49.1%
 
Royal50.9%
 


AlexanderCowell35.8%
 
Royal64.2%
 


AlleghanyCowell43.1%
 
Royal56.9%
 


AnsonCowell74.0%
 
Royal26.0%
 


AsheCowell42.3%
 
Royal57.7%
 


AveryCowell30.3%
 
Royal69.7%
 


BeaufortCowell46.6%
 
Royal53.4%
 


BertieCowell74.3%
 
Royal25.7%
 


BladenCowell59.9%
 
Royal40.1%
 


BrunswickCowell41.3%
 
Royal58.7%
 


BuncombeCowell58.0%
 
Royal42.0%
 


BurkeCowell46.0%
 
Royal54.0%
 


CabarrusCowell47.0%
 
Royal53.0%
 


CaldwellCowell39.4%
 
Royal60.6%
 


CamdenCowell40.3%
 
Royal59.7%
 


CarteretCowell32.8%
 
Royal67.2%
 


CaswellCowell57.8%
 
Royal42.2%
 


CatawbaCowell41.0%
 
Royal59.0%
 


ChathamCowell57.6%
 
Royal42.4%
 


CherokeeCowell34.1%
 
Royal65.9%
 


ChowanCowell55.5%
 
Royal44.5%
 


ClayCowell34.1%
 
Royal65.9%
 


ClevelandCowell49.7%
 
Royal50.3%
 


ColumbusCowell57.9%
 
Royal42.1%
 


CravenCowell44.5%
 
Royal55.5%
 


CumberlandCowell63.9%
 
Royal36.1%
 


CurrituckCowell36.8%
 
Royal63.2%
 


DareCowell46.1%
 
Royal53.9%
 


DavidsonCowell36.4%
 
Royal63.6%
 


DavieCowell33.7%
 
Royal66.3%
 


DuplinCowell50.7%
 
Royal49.3%
 


DurhamCowell78.2%
 
Royal21.8%
 


EdgecombeCowell74.0%
 
Royal26.0%
 


ForsythCowell56.9%
 
Royal43.1%
 


FranklinCowell55.9%
 
Royal44.1%
 


GastonCowell42.5%
 
Royal57.5%
 


GatesCowell59.1%
 
Royal40.9%
 


GrahamCowell36.4%
 
Royal63.6%
 


GranvilleCowell60.1%
 
Royal39.9%
 


GreeneCowell54.4%
 
Royal45.6%
 


GuilfordCowell61.2%
 
Royal38.8%
 


HalifaxCowell73.0%
 
Royal27.0%
 


HarnettCowell48.3%
 
Royal51.7%
 


HaywoodCowell47.6%
 
Royal52.4%
 


HendersonCowell37.7%
 
Royal62.3%
 


HertfordCowell77.0%
 
Royal23.0%
 


HokeCowell64.3%
 
Royal35.7%
 


HydeCowell57.4%
 
Royal42.6%
 


IredellCowell40.5%
 
Royal59.5%
 


JacksonCowell52.7%
 
Royal47.3%
 


JohnstonCowell44.4%
 
Royal55.6%
 


JonesCowell51.1%
 
Royal48.9%
 


LeeCowell54.4%
 
Royal45.6%
 


LenoirCowell55.4%
 
Royal44.6%
 


LincolnCowell37.5%
 
Royal62.5%
 


McDowellCowell38.8%
 
Royal61.2%
 


MaconCowell40.3%
 
Royal59.7%
 


MadisonCowell50.0%
 
Royal50.0%
 


MartinCowell63.2%
 
Royal36.8%
 


MecklenburgCowell63.2%
 
Royal36.8%
 


MitchellCowell27.1%
 
Royal72.9%
 


MontgomeryCowell53.8%
 
Royal46.2%
 


MooreCowell41.4%
 
Royal58.6%
 


NashCowell57.9%
 
Royal42.1%
 


New HanoverCowell48.6%
 
Royal51.4%
 


NorthamptonCowell75.1%
 
Royal24.9%
 


OnslowCowell41.0%
 
Royal59.0%
 


OrangeCowell73.0%
 
Royal27.0%
 


PamlicoCowell46.3%
 
Royal53.7%
 


PasquotankCowell62.1%
 
Royal37.9%
 


PenderCowell42.1%
 
Royal57.9%
 


PerquimansCowell48.0%
 
Royal52.0%
 


PersonCowell55.6%
 
Royal44.4%
 


PittCowell56.7%
 
Royal43.3%
 


PolkCowell43.8%
 
Royal56.2%
 


RandolphCowell31.6%
 
Royal68.4%
 


RichmondCowell65.0%
 
Royal35.0%
 


RobesonCowell69.1%
 
Royal30.9%
 


RockinghamCowell47.5%
 
Royal52.5%
 


RowanCowell43.7%
 
Royal56.3%
 


RutherfordCowell41.3%
 
Royal58.7%
 


SampsonCowell51.7%
 
Royal48.3%
 


ScotlandCowell66.8%
 
Royal33.2%
 


StanlyCowell40.4%
 
Royal59.6%
 


StokesCowell36.0%
 
Royal64.0%
 


SurryCowell40.8%
 
Royal59.2%
 


SwainCowell52.0%
 
Royal48.0%
 


TransylvaniaCowell44.1%
 
Royal55.9%
 


TyrrellCowell60.0%
 
Royal40.0%
 


UnionCowell39.1%
 
Royal60.9%
 


VanceCowell71.5%
 
Royal28.5%
 


WakeCowell60.3%
 
Royal39.7%
 


WarrenCowell75.5%
 
Royal24.5%
 


WashingtonCowell66.2%
 
Royal33.8%
 


WataugaCowell51.3%
 
Royal48.7%
 


WayneCowell51.0%
 
Royal49.0%
 


WilkesCowell36.6%
 
Royal63.4%
 


WilsonCowell60.3%
 
Royal39.7%
 


YadkinCowell32.7%
 
Royal67.3%
 


YanceyCowell47.9%
 
Royal52.1%
 



National DataGraph for 2012 - North Carolina Results for 2012

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved