Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2015-10-23

Map

Map

Alamance	Graham	57.8%
	Davidson	40.4%
	Other	1.8%

Alexander	Graham	45.1%
	Davidson	53.6%
	Other	1.4%

Alleghany	Graham	59.7%
	Davidson	38.9%
	Other	1.4%

Anson	Graham	79.8%
	Davidson	18.5%
	Other	1.7%

Ashe	Graham	50.0%
	Davidson	48.4%
	Other	1.6%

Avery	Graham	33.0%
	Davidson	64.5%
	Other	2.6%

Beaufort	Graham	64.6%
	Davidson	34.2%
	Other	1.1%

Bertie	Graham	82.2%
	Davidson	17.2%
	Other	0.6%

Bladen	Graham	75.7%
	Davidson	23.7%
	Other	0.7%

Brunswick	Graham	55.5%
	Davidson	42.7%
	Other	1.9%

Buncombe	Graham	53.1%
	Davidson	44.2%
	Other	2.7%

Burke	Graham	53.1%
	Davidson	44.5%
	Other	2.5%

Cabarrus	Graham	47.3%
	Davidson	50.3%
	Other	2.4%

Caldwell	Graham	46.9%
	Davidson	51.3%
	Other	1.8%

Camden	Graham	66.5%
	Davidson	31.8%
	Other	1.7%

Carteret	Graham	51.6%
	Davidson	46.0%
	Other	2.4%

Caswell	Graham	71.3%
	Davidson	28.1%
	Other	0.5%

Catawba	Graham	43.0%
	Davidson	55.0%
	Other	2.0%

Chatham	Graham	63.5%
	Davidson	32.0%
	Other	4.5%

Cherokee	Graham	46.6%
	Davidson	52.2%
	Other	1.2%

Chowan	Graham	66.3%
	Davidson	32.4%
	Other	1.3%

Clay	Graham	47.3%
	Davidson	51.4%
	Other	1.3%

Cleveland	Graham	59.2%
	Davidson	39.1%
	Other	1.7%

Columbus	Graham	76.9%
	Davidson	21.9%
	Other	1.2%

Craven	Graham	55.5%
	Davidson	43.3%
	Other	1.1%

Cumberland	Graham	64.2%
	Davidson	34.1%
	Other	1.7%

Currituck	Graham	55.2%
	Davidson	42.0%
	Other	2.8%

Dare	Graham	55.6%
	Davidson	41.5%
	Other	2.9%

Davidson	Graham	45.5%
	Davidson	52.7%
	Other	1.8%

Davie	Graham	39.4%
	Davidson	59.6%
	Other	1.0%

Duplin	Graham	70.9%
	Davidson	28.4%
	Other	0.7%

Durham	Graham	71.6%
	Davidson	24.4%
	Other	4.0%

Edgecombe	Graham	81.4%
	Davidson	17.8%
	Other	0.8%

Forsyth	Graham	53.8%
	Davidson	44.2%
	Other	2.0%

Franklin	Graham	72.1%
	Davidson	26.9%
	Other	1.0%

Gaston	Graham	47.7%
	Davidson	50.4%
	Other	1.9%

Gates	Graham	77.4%
	Davidson	22.2%
	Other	0.4%

Graham	Graham	44.4%
	Davidson	54.8%
	Other	0.8%

Granville	Graham	77.2%
	Davidson	21.7%
	Other	1.1%

Greene	Graham	74.4%
	Davidson	25.1%
	Other	0.5%

Guilford	Graham	58.7%
	Davidson	39.5%
	Other	1.8%

Halifax	Graham	77.5%
	Davidson	21.8%
	Other	0.6%

Harnett	Graham	64.2%
	Davidson	34.6%
	Other	1.2%

Haywood	Graham	63.4%
	Davidson	34.4%
	Other	2.2%

Henderson	Graham	40.0%
	Davidson	58.5%
	Other	1.5%

Hertford	Graham	81.2%
	Davidson	18.3%
	Other	0.5%

Hoke	Graham	74.2%
	Davidson	23.9%
	Other	1.9%

Hyde	Graham	74.7%
	Davidson	24.5%
	Other	0.8%

Iredell	Graham	49.3%
	Davidson	48.9%
	Other	1.8%

Jackson	Graham	56.8%
	Davidson	41.3%
	Other	1.9%

Johnston	Graham	61.9%
	Davidson	37.2%
	Other	1.0%

Jones	Graham	72.5%
	Davidson	26.7%
	Other	0.8%

Lee	Graham	64.4%
	Davidson	34.3%
	Other	1.2%

Lenoir	Graham	66.2%
	Davidson	33.3%
	Other	0.5%

Lincoln	Graham	47.5%
	Davidson	50.3%
	Other	2.2%

McDowell	Graham	50.6%
	Davidson	47.1%
	Other	2.3%

Macon	Graham	48.6%
	Davidson	49.6%
	Other	1.8%

Madison	Graham	57.0%
	Davidson	41.8%
	Other	1.2%

Martin	Graham	81.6%
	Davidson	17.9%
	Other	0.5%

Mecklenburg	Graham	52.0%
	Davidson	45.5%
	Other	2.5%

Mitchell	Graham	31.4%
	Davidson	66.6%
	Other	2.1%

Montgomery	Graham	63.5%
	Davidson	35.2%
	Other	1.4%

Moore	Graham	46.3%
	Davidson	52.8%
	Other	0.9%

Nash	Graham	64.3%
	Davidson	34.7%
	Other	0.9%

New Hanover	Graham	50.8%
	Davidson	46.2%
	Other	3.1%

Northampton	Graham	85.7%
	Davidson	13.6%
	Other	0.7%

Onslow	Graham	55.5%
	Davidson	41.8%
	Other	2.7%

Orange	Graham	67.6%
	Davidson	25.3%
	Other	7.1%

Pamlico	Graham	63.7%
	Davidson	34.6%
	Other	1.8%

Pasquotank	Graham	66.7%
	Davidson	31.4%
	Other	1.9%

Pender	Graham	59.8%
	Davidson	37.9%
	Other	2.3%

Perquimans	Graham	69.2%
	Davidson	29.8%
	Other	1.0%

Person	Graham	76.0%
	Davidson	23.1%
	Other	0.9%

Pitt	Graham	66.0%
	Davidson	32.9%
	Other	1.2%

Polk	Graham	47.1%
	Davidson	50.5%
	Other	2.4%

Randolph	Graham	41.2%
	Davidson	57.3%
	Other	1.5%

Richmond	Graham	75.9%
	Davidson	22.3%
	Other	1.7%

Robeson	Graham	82.7%
	Davidson	16.0%
	Other	1.2%

Rockingham	Graham	59.7%
	Davidson	38.7%
	Other	1.6%

Rowan	Graham	56.5%
	Davidson	41.5%
	Other	2.0%

Rutherford	Graham	52.4%
	Davidson	45.7%
	Other	1.9%

Sampson	Graham	64.4%
	Davidson	35.0%
	Other	0.6%

Scotland	Graham	73.3%
	Davidson	25.4%
	Other	1.3%

Stanly	Graham	46.8%
	Davidson	51.2%
	Other	2.0%

Stokes	Graham	46.0%
	Davidson	52.6%
	Other	1.4%

Surry	Graham	49.6%
	Davidson	49.5%
	Other	1.0%

Swain	Graham	57.9%
	Davidson	40.4%
	Other	1.7%

Transylvania	Graham	47.7%
	Davidson	49.3%
	Other	3.0%

Tyrrell	Graham	78.3%
	Davidson	21.4%
	Other	0.3%

Union	Graham	45.3%
	Davidson	53.2%
	Other	1.5%

Vance	Graham	79.2%
	Davidson	20.0%
	Other	0.8%

Wake	Graham	62.4%
	Davidson	35.1%
	Other	2.4%

Warren	Graham	83.5%
	Davidson	15.8%
	Other	0.7%

Washington	Graham	78.5%
	Davidson	20.3%
	Other	1.1%

Watauga	Graham	50.4%
	Davidson	44.4%
	Other	5.2%

Wayne	Graham	61.0%
	Davidson	38.3%
	Other	0.7%

Wilkes	Graham	45.6%
	Davidson	52.8%
	Other	1.6%

Wilson	Graham	65.1%
	Davidson	34.3%
	Other	0.6%

Yadkin	Graham	41.8%
	Davidson	57.3%
	Other	1.0%

Yancey	Graham	55.1%
	Davidson	43.6%
	Other	1.3%

National DataGraph for 1996 - North Carolina Results for 1996

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved