Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Adair	Williams	30.7%
	Wagner	65.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Andrew	Williams	22.4%
	Wagner	74.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Atchison	Williams	19.5%
	Wagner	77.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Audrain	Williams	25.7%
	Wagner	69.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Barry	Williams	21.0%
	Wagner	75.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Barton	Williams	12.9%
	Wagner	83.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Bates	Williams	22.1%
	Wagner	73.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Benton	Williams	21.9%
	Wagner	73.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Bollinger	Williams	15.3%
	Wagner	81.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Boone	Williams	46.0%
	Wagner	49.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Buchanan	Williams	31.8%
	Wagner	64.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Butler	Williams	18.1%
	Wagner	79.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Caldwell	Williams	20.2%
	Wagner	74.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

Callaway	Williams	23.8%
	Wagner	71.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.5%

Camden	Williams	20.5%
	Wagner	76.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Cape Girardeau	Williams	22.3%
	Wagner	74.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Carroll	Williams	15.8%
	Wagner	81.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Carter	Williams	17.4%
	Wagner	79.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Cass	Williams	26.3%
	Wagner	69.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Cedar	Williams	15.4%
	Wagner	80.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Chariton	Williams	23.0%
	Wagner	74.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Christian	Williams	24.2%
	Wagner	70.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Clark	Williams	21.0%
	Wagner	75.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Clay	Williams	39.1%
	Wagner	57.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Clinton	Williams	26.0%
	Wagner	69.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Cole	Williams	25.3%
	Wagner	71.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Cooper	Williams	22.7%
	Wagner	72.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Crawford	Williams	19.0%
	Wagner	78.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Dade	Williams	15.7%
	Wagner	80.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Dallas	Williams	16.3%
	Wagner	79.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Daviess	Williams	20.0%
	Wagner	76.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

DeKalb	Williams	20.0%
	Wagner	76.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Dent	Williams	13.7%
	Wagner	84.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Douglas	Williams	14.6%
	Wagner	82.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Dunklin	Williams	24.1%
	Wagner	73.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Franklin	Williams	25.1%
	Wagner	70.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Gasconade	Williams	18.3%
	Wagner	78.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Gentry	Williams	20.8%
	Wagner	76.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Greene	Williams	35.5%
	Wagner	58.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.9%

Grundy	Williams	17.0%
	Wagner	80.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Harrison	Williams	15.9%
	Wagner	80.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Henry	Williams	24.7%
	Wagner	71.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Hickory	Williams	21.5%
	Wagner	74.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Holt	Williams	14.3%
	Wagner	83.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Howard	Williams	27.7%
	Wagner	66.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.4%

Howell	Williams	16.4%
	Wagner	80.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Iron	Williams	26.9%
	Wagner	70.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Jackson	Williams	58.1%
	Wagner	39.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Jasper	Williams	24.5%
	Wagner	70.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.7%

Jefferson	Williams	33.3%
	Wagner	62.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Johnson	Williams	26.8%
	Wagner	67.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Knox	Williams	17.8%
	Wagner	80.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Laclede	Williams	14.9%
	Wagner	81.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Lafayette	Williams	36.5%
	Wagner	60.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Lawrence	Williams	23.2%
	Wagner	70.8%
		0.0%
	Other	6.0%

Lewis	Williams	20.8%
	Wagner	75.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Lincoln	Williams	26.4%
	Wagner	69.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Linn	Williams	22.5%
	Wagner	74.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Livingston	Williams	17.7%
	Wagner	79.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

McDonald	Williams	17.7%
	Wagner	77.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Macon	Williams	21.0%
	Wagner	76.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Madison	Williams	20.7%
	Wagner	70.5%
		0.0%
	Other	8.8%

Maries	Williams	18.5%
	Wagner	78.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Marion	Williams	23.1%
	Wagner	74.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Mercer	Williams	11.7%
	Wagner	86.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Miller	Williams	14.6%
	Wagner	82.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Mississippi	Williams	30.8%
	Wagner	67.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Moniteau	Williams	19.1%
	Wagner	77.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Monroe	Williams	22.6%
	Wagner	74.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Montgomery	Williams	20.2%
	Wagner	76.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Morgan	Williams	20.4%
	Wagner	75.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

New Madrid	Williams	28.7%
	Wagner	69.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Newton	Williams	22.0%
	Wagner	74.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Nodaway	Williams	24.1%
	Wagner	73.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Oregon	Williams	19.7%
	Wagner	77.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Osage	Williams	12.7%
	Wagner	84.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Ozark	Williams	16.6%
	Wagner	80.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Pemiscot	Williams	34.2%
	Wagner	63.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Perry	Williams	17.7%
	Wagner	79.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Pettis	Williams	23.7%
	Wagner	71.0%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Phelps	Williams	24.3%
	Wagner	72.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Pike	Williams	28.6%
	Wagner	68.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Platte	Williams	35.0%
	Wagner	60.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Polk	Williams	21.1%
	Wagner	74.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Pulaski	Williams	21.1%
	Wagner	74.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.8%

Putnam	Williams	14.0%
	Wagner	84.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Ralls	Williams	24.3%
	Wagner	73.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Randolph	Williams	24.0%
	Wagner	70.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

Ray	Williams	41.1%
	Wagner	55.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Reynolds	Williams	20.3%
	Wagner	77.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Ripley	Williams	17.1%
	Wagner	80.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

St. Charles	Williams	32.7%
	Wagner	62.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.5%

St. Clair	Williams	21.5%
	Wagner	74.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Ste. Genevieve	Williams	34.9%
	Wagner	62.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

St. Francois	Williams	28.9%
	Wagner	68.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

St. Louis	Williams	52.1%
	Wagner	44.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Saline	Williams	41.8%
	Wagner	54.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Schuyler	Williams	17.7%
	Wagner	79.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Scotland	Williams	17.4%
	Wagner	79.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Scott	Williams	22.9%
	Wagner	74.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Shannon	Williams	21.6%
	Wagner	75.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Shelby	Williams	20.6%
	Wagner	77.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Stoddard	Williams	15.7%
	Wagner	81.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Stone	Williams	20.1%
	Wagner	76.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Sullivan	Williams	20.6%
	Wagner	77.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Taney	Williams	20.2%
	Wagner	76.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Texas	Williams	15.7%
	Wagner	81.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Vernon	Williams	19.8%
	Wagner	77.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Warren	Williams	24.9%
	Wagner	70.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.5%

Washington	Williams	27.3%
	Wagner	69.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Wayne	Williams	19.5%
	Wagner	77.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Webster	Williams	19.4%
	Wagner	76.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Worth	Williams	20.0%
	Wagner	75.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Wright	Williams	14.5%
	Wagner	83.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

City

St. Louis	Williams	77.1%
	Wagner	17.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

National DataGraph for 2016 - Missouri Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved