Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2010-11-23

Map

Map

Aitkin	Swanson	55.1%
	Barden	38.3%
	Dahn	5.4%
	Other	1.1%

Anoka	Swanson	48.4%
	Barden	46.1%
	Dahn	4.7%
	Other	0.7%

Becker	Swanson	42.9%
	Barden	50.3%
	Dahn	6.0%
	Other	0.8%

Beltrami	Swanson	53.1%
	Barden	41.1%
	Dahn	4.8%
	Other	1.1%

Benton	Swanson	46.1%
	Barden	46.8%
	Dahn	5.9%
	Other	1.2%

Big Stone	Swanson	55.0%
	Barden	38.9%
	Dahn	5.3%
	Other	0.8%

Blue Earth	Swanson	53.0%
	Barden	39.3%
	Dahn	6.8%
	Other	0.8%

Brown	Swanson	44.7%
	Barden	46.9%
	Dahn	7.7%
	Other	0.8%

Carlton	Swanson	61.8%
	Barden	32.4%
	Dahn	4.8%
	Other	1.0%

Carver	Swanson	39.2%
	Barden	55.8%
	Dahn	4.5%
	Other	0.5%

Cass	Swanson	45.5%
	Barden	47.8%
	Dahn	5.9%
	Other	0.7%

Chippewa	Swanson	55.4%
	Barden	38.0%
	Dahn	5.9%
	Other	0.7%

Chisago	Swanson	45.7%
	Barden	48.0%
	Dahn	5.6%
	Other	0.7%

Clay	Swanson	52.0%
	Barden	42.5%
	Dahn	4.9%
	Other	0.6%

Clearwater	Swanson	44.3%
	Barden	49.1%
	Dahn	5.7%
	Other	1.0%

Cook	Swanson	61.3%
	Barden	32.8%
	Dahn	5.6%
	Other	0.3%

Cottonwood	Swanson	47.4%
	Barden	45.3%
	Dahn	6.5%
	Other	0.8%

Crow Wing	Swanson	46.5%
	Barden	46.9%
	Dahn	5.8%
	Other	0.8%

Dakota	Swanson	49.9%
	Barden	44.8%
	Dahn	4.8%
	Other	0.6%

Dodge	Swanson	42.7%
	Barden	48.4%
	Dahn	8.1%
	Other	0.9%

Douglas	Swanson	44.4%
	Barden	48.4%
	Dahn	6.4%
	Other	0.7%

Faribault	Swanson	48.6%
	Barden	43.4%
	Dahn	6.9%
	Other	1.1%

Fillmore	Swanson	48.1%
	Barden	42.5%
	Dahn	8.4%
	Other	1.0%

Freeborn	Swanson	55.4%
	Barden	37.2%
	Dahn	6.4%
	Other	1.0%

Goodhue	Swanson	49.5%
	Barden	44.1%
	Dahn	5.7%
	Other	0.7%

Grant	Swanson	54.4%
	Barden	38.1%
	Dahn	6.6%
	Other	0.9%

Hennepin	Swanson	60.3%
	Barden	35.3%
	Dahn	3.8%
	Other	0.6%

Houston	Swanson	43.4%
	Barden	48.4%
	Dahn	7.0%
	Other	1.2%

Hubbard	Swanson	44.5%
	Barden	48.4%
	Dahn	6.1%
	Other	1.0%

Isanti	Swanson	44.3%
	Barden	49.0%
	Dahn	5.9%
	Other	0.8%

Itasca	Swanson	57.9%
	Barden	36.1%
	Dahn	5.2%
	Other	0.8%

Jackson	Swanson	46.2%
	Barden	45.1%
	Dahn	7.6%
	Other	1.0%

Kanabec	Swanson	50.2%
	Barden	43.7%
	Dahn	5.4%
	Other	0.8%

Kandiyohi	Swanson	50.1%
	Barden	44.0%
	Dahn	5.1%
	Other	0.8%

Kittson	Swanson	57.5%
	Barden	36.7%
	Dahn	5.2%
	Other	0.6%

Koochiching	Swanson	59.6%
	Barden	33.3%
	Dahn	6.0%
	Other	1.1%

Lac Qui Parle	Swanson	58.0%
	Barden	34.9%
	Dahn	5.8%
	Other	1.3%

Lake	Swanson	62.7%
	Barden	32.1%
	Dahn	4.5%
	Other	0.7%

Lake of the Woods	Swanson	45.5%
	Barden	47.0%
	Dahn	6.4%
	Other	1.1%

Le Sueur	Swanson	49.1%
	Barden	41.9%
	Dahn	8.1%
	Other	0.8%

Lincoln	Swanson	49.6%
	Barden	43.1%
	Dahn	6.5%
	Other	0.9%

Lyon	Swanson	46.6%
	Barden	46.2%
	Dahn	6.6%
	Other	0.6%

McLeod	Swanson	43.6%
	Barden	49.6%
	Dahn	6.1%
	Other	0.7%

Mahnomen	Swanson	60.9%
	Barden	31.1%
	Dahn	7.1%
	Other	0.9%

Marshall	Swanson	54.7%
	Barden	39.7%
	Dahn	5.0%
	Other	0.7%

Martin	Swanson	44.0%
	Barden	48.4%
	Dahn	7.0%
	Other	0.7%

Meeker	Swanson	46.9%
	Barden	44.2%
	Dahn	7.8%
	Other	1.1%

Mille Lacs	Swanson	48.9%
	Barden	44.1%
	Dahn	5.9%
	Other	1.2%

Morrison	Swanson	45.6%
	Barden	46.6%
	Dahn	6.8%
	Other	1.0%

Mower	Swanson	57.3%
	Barden	32.4%
	Dahn	9.5%
	Other	0.9%

Murray	Swanson	46.5%
	Barden	45.8%
	Dahn	7.1%
	Other	0.6%

Nicollet	Swanson	55.1%
	Barden	38.2%
	Dahn	5.9%
	Other	0.8%

Nobles	Swanson	42.0%
	Barden	49.8%
	Dahn	7.4%
	Other	0.7%

Norman	Swanson	61.8%
	Barden	32.3%
	Dahn	5.1%
	Other	0.8%

Olmsted	Swanson	46.0%
	Barden	47.2%
	Dahn	6.1%
	Other	0.8%

Otter Tail	Swanson	39.8%
	Barden	53.4%
	Dahn	5.8%
	Other	1.0%

Pennington	Swanson	49.1%
	Barden	43.3%
	Dahn	6.5%
	Other	1.1%

Pine	Swanson	54.1%
	Barden	39.3%
	Dahn	5.5%
	Other	1.0%

Pipestone	Swanson	36.3%
	Barden	56.4%
	Dahn	6.8%
	Other	0.6%

Polk	Swanson	51.0%
	Barden	43.5%
	Dahn	4.8%
	Other	0.7%

Pope	Swanson	53.9%
	Barden	39.2%
	Dahn	6.0%
	Other	0.8%

Ramsey	Swanson	64.0%
	Barden	30.6%
	Dahn	4.4%
	Other	1.0%

Red Lake	Swanson	57.5%
	Barden	36.1%
	Dahn	5.9%
	Other	0.5%

Redwood	Swanson	44.3%
	Barden	48.3%
	Dahn	6.4%
	Other	1.0%

Renville	Swanson	52.4%
	Barden	39.7%
	Dahn	7.1%
	Other	0.8%

Rice	Swanson	55.0%
	Barden	38.6%
	Dahn	5.7%
	Other	0.7%

Rock	Swanson	36.7%
	Barden	56.4%
	Dahn	6.3%
	Other	0.6%

Roseau	Swanson	42.9%
	Barden	49.7%
	Dahn	6.4%
	Other	1.0%

St. Louis	Swanson	65.7%
	Barden	29.0%
	Dahn	4.5%
	Other	0.9%

Scott	Swanson	41.2%
	Barden	53.1%
	Dahn	5.1%
	Other	0.6%

Sherburne	Swanson	40.2%
	Barden	53.9%
	Dahn	5.2%
	Other	0.7%

Sibley	Swanson	46.4%
	Barden	45.5%
	Dahn	7.0%
	Other	1.1%

Stearns	Swanson	46.1%
	Barden	46.6%
	Dahn	5.9%
	Other	1.5%

Steele	Swanson	49.5%
	Barden	42.7%
	Dahn	6.8%
	Other	1.1%

Stevens	Swanson	52.6%
	Barden	42.3%
	Dahn	4.6%
	Other	0.5%

Swift	Swanson	59.5%
	Barden	33.4%
	Dahn	6.2%
	Other	0.9%

Todd	Swanson	47.7%
	Barden	43.6%
	Dahn	7.5%
	Other	1.2%

Traverse	Swanson	55.4%
	Barden	37.1%
	Dahn	6.5%
	Other	1.1%

Wabasha	Swanson	47.6%
	Barden	44.6%
	Dahn	6.8%
	Other	1.0%

Wadena	Swanson	42.4%
	Barden	51.4%
	Dahn	5.5%
	Other	0.7%

Waseca	Swanson	47.7%
	Barden	43.3%
	Dahn	8.2%
	Other	0.8%

Washington	Swanson	50.3%
	Barden	44.5%
	Dahn	4.6%
	Other	0.5%

Watonwan	Swanson	52.3%
	Barden	39.4%
	Dahn	7.6%
	Other	0.7%

Wilkin	Swanson	42.1%
	Barden	51.2%
	Dahn	5.6%
	Other	1.1%

Winona	Swanson	48.9%
	Barden	43.4%
	Dahn	6.5%
	Other	1.3%

Wright	Swanson	39.7%
	Barden	54.3%
	Dahn	5.3%
	Other	0.8%

Yellow Medicine	Swanson	53.6%
	Barden	39.4%
	Dahn	6.2%
	Other	0.8%

National DataGraph for 2010 - Minnesota Results for 2010

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved