Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-01-25

Map

Map

Aitkin	Humphrey	65.7%
	Anderson	30.7%
	Other	3.6%

Anoka	Humphrey	65.1%
	Anderson	29.6%
	Other	5.4%

Becker	Humphrey	63.0%
	Anderson	34.9%
	Other	2.1%

Beltrami	Humphrey	63.6%
	Anderson	33.1%
	Other	3.3%

Benton	Humphrey	64.4%
	Anderson	31.9%
	Other	3.7%

Big Stone	Humphrey	69.8%
	Anderson	27.7%
	Other	2.4%

Blue Earth	Humphrey	65.7%
	Anderson	30.7%
	Other	3.7%

Brown	Humphrey	62.8%
	Anderson	34.9%
	Other	2.3%

Carlton	Humphrey	76.0%
	Anderson	21.6%
	Other	2.4%

Carver	Humphrey	56.2%
	Anderson	39.9%
	Other	3.9%

Cass	Humphrey	60.4%
	Anderson	35.8%
	Other	3.7%

Chippewa	Humphrey	67.9%
	Anderson	29.8%
	Other	2.3%

Chisago	Humphrey	64.4%
	Anderson	29.9%
	Other	5.8%

Clay	Humphrey	70.1%
	Anderson	28.3%
	Other	1.6%

Clearwater	Humphrey	59.9%
	Anderson	37.3%
	Other	2.8%

Cook	Humphrey	65.1%
	Anderson	31.1%
	Other	3.8%

Cottonwood	Humphrey	63.1%
	Anderson	34.9%
	Other	2.0%

Crow Wing	Humphrey	63.4%
	Anderson	33.5%
	Other	3.2%

Dakota	Humphrey	66.5%
	Anderson	29.3%
	Other	4.2%

Dodge	Humphrey	62.0%
	Anderson	35.2%
	Other	2.9%

Douglas	Humphrey	60.2%
	Anderson	37.3%
	Other	2.5%

Faribault	Humphrey	61.6%
	Anderson	36.0%
	Other	2.4%

Fillmore	Humphrey	60.2%
	Anderson	37.6%
	Other	2.2%

Freeborn	Humphrey	71.3%
	Anderson	26.8%
	Other	1.9%

Goodhue	Humphrey	65.7%
	Anderson	30.7%
	Other	3.6%

Grant	Humphrey	69.1%
	Anderson	28.6%
	Other	2.2%

Hennepin	Humphrey	67.0%
	Anderson	27.7%
	Other	5.3%

Houston	Humphrey	53.7%
	Anderson	43.3%
	Other	3.0%

Hubbard	Humphrey	62.5%
	Anderson	34.3%
	Other	3.2%

Isanti	Humphrey	63.4%
	Anderson	31.8%
	Other	4.8%

Itasca	Humphrey	70.6%
	Anderson	25.9%
	Other	3.5%

Jackson	Humphrey	68.1%
	Anderson	30.1%
	Other	1.8%

Kanabec	Humphrey	62.2%
	Anderson	33.1%
	Other	4.7%

Kandiyohi	Humphrey	68.6%
	Anderson	28.4%
	Other	3.0%

Kittson	Humphrey	65.4%
	Anderson	32.3%
	Other	2.3%

Koochiching	Humphrey	71.6%
	Anderson	25.1%
	Other	3.3%

Lac Qui Parle	Humphrey	69.0%
	Anderson	28.7%
	Other	2.3%

Lake	Humphrey	75.5%
	Anderson	21.1%
	Other	3.4%

Lake of the Woods	Humphrey	54.5%
	Anderson	42.5%
	Other	3.0%

Le Sueur	Humphrey	67.3%
	Anderson	29.5%
	Other	3.3%

Lincoln	Humphrey	63.7%
	Anderson	33.3%
	Other	3.0%

Lyon	Humphrey	61.8%
	Anderson	35.6%
	Other	2.6%

McLeod	Humphrey	60.7%
	Anderson	36.4%
	Other	3.0%

Mahnomen	Humphrey	64.0%
	Anderson	32.9%
	Other	3.1%

Marshall	Humphrey	67.3%
	Anderson	30.3%
	Other	2.4%

Martin	Humphrey	61.9%
	Anderson	36.0%
	Other	2.1%

Meeker	Humphrey	64.3%
	Anderson	32.0%
	Other	3.8%

Mille Lacs	Humphrey	66.2%
	Anderson	30.0%
	Other	3.8%

Morrison	Humphrey	66.9%
	Anderson	30.0%
	Other	3.1%

Mower	Humphrey	74.3%
	Anderson	23.5%
	Other	2.2%

Murray	Humphrey	68.0%
	Anderson	29.4%
	Other	2.7%

Nicollet	Humphrey	66.9%
	Anderson	29.9%
	Other	3.2%

Nobles	Humphrey	65.1%
	Anderson	33.4%
	Other	1.5%

Norman	Humphrey	70.1%
	Anderson	28.4%
	Other	1.6%

Olmsted	Humphrey	61.6%
	Anderson	36.1%
	Other	2.3%

Otter Tail	Humphrey	61.5%
	Anderson	36.0%
	Other	2.5%

Pennington	Humphrey	65.3%
	Anderson	32.2%
	Other	2.5%

Pine	Humphrey	68.4%
	Anderson	26.8%
	Other	4.8%

Pipestone	Humphrey	59.9%
	Anderson	38.1%
	Other	2.0%

Polk	Humphrey	64.2%
	Anderson	33.9%
	Other	1.9%

Pope	Humphrey	68.3%
	Anderson	28.9%
	Other	2.8%

Ramsey	Humphrey	72.3%
	Anderson	21.8%
	Other	5.8%

Red Lake	Humphrey	69.9%
	Anderson	28.3%
	Other	1.9%

Redwood	Humphrey	57.7%
	Anderson	39.2%
	Other	3.1%

Renville	Humphrey	66.8%
	Anderson	29.9%
	Other	3.3%

Rice	Humphrey	72.4%
	Anderson	24.0%
	Other	3.6%

Rock	Humphrey	58.2%
	Anderson	39.8%
	Other	2.0%

Roseau	Humphrey	51.4%
	Anderson	45.7%
	Other	2.9%

St. Louis	Humphrey	76.9%
	Anderson	20.0%
	Other	3.0%

Scott	Humphrey	59.2%
	Anderson	36.1%
	Other	4.6%

Sherburne	Humphrey	62.2%
	Anderson	33.8%
	Other	4.1%

Sibley	Humphrey	59.1%
	Anderson	37.5%
	Other	3.4%

Stearns	Humphrey	63.0%
	Anderson	33.8%
	Other	3.2%

Steele	Humphrey	61.4%
	Anderson	35.5%
	Other	3.1%

Stevens	Humphrey	64.9%
	Anderson	32.6%
	Other	2.4%

Swift	Humphrey	71.5%
	Anderson	25.6%
	Other	2.9%

Todd	Humphrey	62.8%
	Anderson	33.7%
	Other	3.5%

Traverse	Humphrey	66.1%
	Anderson	31.4%
	Other	2.5%

Wabasha	Humphrey	63.3%
	Anderson	33.8%
	Other	2.8%

Wadena	Humphrey	58.7%
	Anderson	38.5%
	Other	2.8%

Waseca	Humphrey	63.1%
	Anderson	34.2%
	Other	2.6%

Washington	Humphrey	67.4%
	Anderson	27.6%
	Other	5.1%

Watonwan	Humphrey	63.2%
	Anderson	34.6%
	Other	2.2%

Wilkin	Humphrey	63.3%
	Anderson	34.3%
	Other	2.3%

Winona	Humphrey	61.4%
	Anderson	35.8%
	Other	2.8%

Wright	Humphrey	60.6%
	Anderson	35.0%
	Other	4.4%

Yellow Medicine	Humphrey	64.6%
	Anderson	33.4%
	Other	2.0%

National DataGraph for 1994 - Minnesota Results for 1994

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved