Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-01-26

Map

Map

Aitkin	Humphrey	64.4%
	Johnson	35.6%

Anoka	Humphrey	64.8%
	Johnson	35.2%

Becker	Humphrey	63.4%
	Johnson	36.6%

Beltrami	Humphrey	67.1%
	Johnson	32.9%

Benton	Humphrey	64.0%
	Johnson	36.0%

Big Stone	Humphrey	70.0%
	Johnson	30.0%

Blue Earth	Humphrey	60.0%
	Johnson	40.0%

Brown	Humphrey	56.7%
	Johnson	43.3%

Carlton	Humphrey	75.6%
	Johnson	24.4%

Carver	Humphrey	53.7%
	Johnson	46.3%

Cass	Humphrey	60.7%
	Johnson	39.3%

Chippewa	Humphrey	62.2%
	Johnson	37.8%

Chisago	Humphrey	65.7%
	Johnson	34.3%

Clay	Humphrey	67.5%
	Johnson	32.5%

Clearwater	Humphrey	65.2%
	Johnson	34.8%

Cook	Humphrey	60.8%
	Johnson	39.2%

Cottonwood	Humphrey	56.9%
	Johnson	43.1%

Crow Wing	Humphrey	62.0%
	Johnson	38.0%

Dakota	Humphrey	59.6%
	Johnson	40.4%

Dodge	Humphrey	59.1%
	Johnson	40.9%

Douglas	Humphrey	58.0%
	Johnson	42.0%

Faribault	Humphrey	56.9%
	Johnson	43.1%

Fillmore	Humphrey	55.7%
	Johnson	44.3%

Freeborn	Humphrey	61.6%
	Johnson	38.4%

Goodhue	Humphrey	60.5%
	Johnson	39.5%

Grant	Humphrey	68.5%
	Johnson	31.5%

Hennepin	Humphrey	61.8%
	Johnson	38.2%

Houston	Humphrey	57.0%
	Johnson	43.0%

Hubbard	Humphrey	59.8%
	Johnson	40.2%

Isanti	Humphrey	65.1%
	Johnson	34.9%

Itasca	Humphrey	72.5%
	Johnson	27.5%

Jackson	Humphrey	65.0%
	Johnson	35.0%

Kanabec	Humphrey	63.4%
	Johnson	36.6%

Kandiyohi	Humphrey	63.1%
	Johnson	36.9%

Kittson	Humphrey	66.8%
	Johnson	33.2%

Koochiching	Humphrey	70.8%
	Johnson	29.2%

Lac Qui Parle	Humphrey	66.7%
	Johnson	33.3%

Lake	Humphrey	76.7%
	Johnson	23.3%

Lake of the Woods	Humphrey	61.2%
	Johnson	38.8%

Le Sueur	Humphrey	64.9%
	Johnson	35.1%

Lincoln	Humphrey	63.5%
	Johnson	36.5%

Lyon	Humphrey	59.5%
	Johnson	40.5%

McLeod	Humphrey	56.0%
	Johnson	44.0%

Mahnomen	Humphrey	68.2%
	Johnson	31.8%

Marshall	Humphrey	68.6%
	Johnson	31.4%

Martin	Humphrey	53.3%
	Johnson	46.7%

Meeker	Humphrey	60.7%
	Johnson	39.3%

Mille Lacs	Humphrey	64.6%
	Johnson	35.4%

Morrison	Humphrey	67.0%
	Johnson	33.0%

Mower	Humphrey	67.9%
	Johnson	32.1%

Murray	Humphrey	62.6%
	Johnson	37.4%

Nicollet	Humphrey	60.6%
	Johnson	39.4%

Nobles	Humphrey	64.7%
	Johnson	35.3%

Norman	Humphrey	69.0%
	Johnson	31.0%

Olmsted	Humphrey	54.9%
	Johnson	45.1%

Otter Tail	Humphrey	58.3%
	Johnson	41.7%

Pennington	Humphrey	68.7%
	Johnson	31.3%

Pine	Humphrey	69.7%
	Johnson	30.3%

Pipestone	Humphrey	59.0%
	Johnson	41.0%

Polk	Humphrey	64.1%
	Johnson	35.9%

Pope	Humphrey	65.9%
	Johnson	34.1%

Ramsey	Humphrey	66.9%
	Johnson	33.1%

Red Lake	Humphrey	74.5%
	Johnson	25.5%

Redwood	Humphrey	51.7%
	Johnson	48.3%

Renville	Humphrey	62.3%
	Johnson	37.7%

Rice	Humphrey	66.4%
	Johnson	33.6%

Rock	Humphrey	58.9%
	Johnson	41.1%

Roseau	Humphrey	57.9%
	Johnson	42.1%

St. Louis	Humphrey	78.1%
	Johnson	21.9%

Scott	Humphrey	57.4%
	Johnson	42.6%

Sherburne	Humphrey	61.6%
	Johnson	38.4%

Sibley	Humphrey	58.1%
	Johnson	41.9%

Stearns	Humphrey	61.8%
	Johnson	38.2%

Steele	Humphrey	58.2%
	Johnson	41.8%

Stevens	Humphrey	66.6%
	Johnson	33.4%

Swift	Humphrey	71.3%
	Johnson	28.7%

Todd	Humphrey	64.6%
	Johnson	35.4%

Traverse	Humphrey	67.0%
	Johnson	33.0%

Wabasha	Humphrey	58.3%
	Johnson	41.7%

Wadena	Humphrey	56.6%
	Johnson	43.4%

Waseca	Humphrey	61.2%
	Johnson	38.8%

Washington	Humphrey	60.7%
	Johnson	39.3%

Watonwan	Humphrey	56.8%
	Johnson	43.2%

Wilkin	Humphrey	61.0%
	Johnson	39.0%

Winona	Humphrey	61.8%
	Johnson	38.2%

Wright	Humphrey	62.4%
	Johnson	37.6%

Yellow Medicine	Humphrey	65.1%
	Johnson	34.9%

National DataGraph for 1990 - Minnesota Results for 1990

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved