Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-01-26

Map

Map

Aitkin	Keith	55.0%
	Peterson	45.0%

Anoka	Keith	60.2%
	Peterson	39.8%

Becker	Keith	50.4%
	Peterson	49.6%

Beltrami	Keith	51.6%
	Peterson	48.4%

Benton	Keith	52.3%
	Peterson	47.7%

Big Stone	Keith	59.2%
	Peterson	40.8%

Blue Earth	Keith	39.2%
	Peterson	60.8%

Brown	Keith	35.8%
	Peterson	64.2%

Carlton	Keith	65.4%
	Peterson	34.6%

Carver	Keith	36.7%
	Peterson	63.3%

Cass	Keith	47.6%
	Peterson	52.4%

Chippewa	Keith	50.6%
	Peterson	49.4%

Chisago	Keith	47.6%
	Peterson	52.4%

Clay	Keith	46.0%
	Peterson	54.0%

Clearwater	Keith	62.1%
	Peterson	37.9%

Cook	Keith	43.0%
	Peterson	57.0%

Cottonwood	Keith	38.1%
	Peterson	61.9%

Crow Wing	Keith	51.9%
	Peterson	48.1%

Dakota	Keith	55.5%
	Peterson	44.5%

Dodge	Keith	39.6%
	Peterson	60.4%

Douglas	Keith	47.4%
	Peterson	52.6%

Faribault	Keith	36.9%
	Peterson	63.1%

Fillmore	Keith	35.3%
	Peterson	64.7%

Freeborn	Keith	48.0%
	Peterson	52.0%

Goodhue	Keith	37.2%
	Peterson	62.8%

Grant	Keith	52.1%
	Peterson	47.9%

Hennepin	Keith	47.2%
	Peterson	52.8%

Houston	Keith	37.0%
	Peterson	63.0%

Hubbard	Keith	43.2%
	Peterson	56.8%

Isanti	Keith	53.7%
	Peterson	46.3%

Itasca	Keith	62.3%
	Peterson	37.7%

Jackson	Keith	51.2%
	Peterson	48.8%

Kanabec	Keith	48.5%
	Peterson	51.5%

Kandiyohi	Keith	56.3%
	Peterson	43.7%

Kittson	Keith	56.8%
	Peterson	43.2%

Koochiching	Keith	68.8%
	Peterson	31.2%

Lac Qui Parle	Keith	48.1%
	Peterson	51.9%

Lake	Keith	66.9%
	Peterson	33.1%

Lake of the Woods	Keith	61.9%
	Peterson	38.1%

Le Sueur	Keith	50.1%
	Peterson	49.9%

Lincoln	Keith	55.5%
	Peterson	44.5%

Lyon	Keith	49.5%
	Peterson	50.5%

McLeod	Keith	34.2%
	Peterson	65.8%

Mahnomen	Keith	65.0%
	Peterson	35.0%

Marshall	Keith	59.0%
	Peterson	41.0%

Martin	Keith	32.9%
	Peterson	67.1%

Meeker	Keith	45.3%
	Peterson	54.7%

Mille Lacs	Keith	47.0%
	Peterson	53.0%

Morrison	Keith	57.7%
	Peterson	42.3%

Mower	Keith	52.7%
	Peterson	47.3%

Murray	Keith	44.6%
	Peterson	55.4%

Nicollet	Keith	39.2%
	Peterson	60.8%

Nobles	Keith	46.9%
	Peterson	53.1%

Norman	Keith	54.5%
	Peterson	45.5%

Olmsted	Keith	45.3%
	Peterson	54.7%

Otter Tail	Keith	35.3%
	Peterson	64.7%

Pennington	Keith	58.0%
	Peterson	42.0%

Pine	Keith	56.0%
	Peterson	44.0%

Pipestone	Keith	39.1%
	Peterson	60.9%

Polk	Keith	55.8%
	Peterson	44.2%

Pope	Keith	50.0%
	Peterson	50.0%

Ramsey	Keith	55.3%
	Peterson	44.7%

Red Lake	Keith	68.4%
	Peterson	31.6%

Redwood	Keith	36.5%
	Peterson	63.5%

Renville	Keith	45.5%
	Peterson	54.5%

Rice	Keith	42.5%
	Peterson	57.5%

Rock	Keith	32.5%
	Peterson	67.5%

Roseau	Keith	60.8%
	Peterson	39.2%

St. Louis	Keith	63.7%
	Peterson	36.3%

Scott	Keith	57.3%
	Peterson	42.7%

Sherburne	Keith	47.2%
	Peterson	52.8%

Sibley	Keith	33.8%
	Peterson	66.2%

Stearns	Keith	51.9%
	Peterson	48.1%

Steele	Keith	37.2%
	Peterson	62.8%

Stevens	Keith	45.2%
	Peterson	54.8%

Swift	Keith	58.7%
	Peterson	41.3%

Todd	Keith	48.6%
	Peterson	51.4%

Traverse	Keith	60.1%
	Peterson	39.9%

Wabasha	Keith	43.7%
	Peterson	56.3%

Wadena	Keith	42.9%
	Peterson	57.1%

Waseca	Keith	36.0%
	Peterson	64.0%

Washington	Keith	51.7%
	Peterson	48.3%

Watonwan	Keith	38.4%
	Peterson	61.6%

Wilkin	Keith	48.9%
	Peterson	51.1%

Winona	Keith	46.4%
	Peterson	53.6%

Wright	Keith	47.8%
	Peterson	52.2%

Yellow Medicine	Keith	52.2%
	Peterson	47.8%

National DataGraph for 1962 - Minnesota Results for 1962

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved