Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2015-02-16

Map

Map

Aitkin	Humphrey	56.1%
	Peterson	43.6%
	Other	0.3%

Anoka	Humphrey	69.4%
	Peterson	30.4%
	Other	0.3%

Becker	Humphrey	56.9%
	Peterson	42.8%
	Other	0.4%

Beltrami	Humphrey	56.8%
	Peterson	43.1%
	Other	0.2%

Benton	Humphrey	57.9%
	Peterson	41.8%
	Other	0.3%

Big Stone	Humphrey	63.9%
	Peterson	35.8%
	Other	0.3%

Blue Earth	Humphrey	48.0%
	Peterson	51.8%
	Other	0.2%

Brown	Humphrey	41.3%
	Peterson	58.5%
	Other	0.2%

Carlton	Humphrey	68.4%
	Peterson	31.4%
	Other	0.2%

Carver	Humphrey	41.7%
	Peterson	58.1%
	Other	0.2%

Cass	Humphrey	50.7%
	Peterson	49.0%
	Other	0.3%

Chippewa	Humphrey	55.8%
	Peterson	43.9%
	Other	0.3%

Chisago	Humphrey	55.4%
	Peterson	44.5%
	Other	0.2%

Clay	Humphrey	54.8%
	Peterson	45.0%
	Other	0.2%

Clearwater	Humphrey	68.3%
	Peterson	31.4%
	Other	0.3%

Cook	Humphrey	43.2%
	Peterson	56.6%
	Other	0.2%

Cottonwood	Humphrey	44.7%
	Peterson	55.1%
	Other	0.2%

Crow Wing	Humphrey	52.8%
	Peterson	46.9%
	Other	0.3%

Dakota	Humphrey	62.8%
	Peterson	36.9%
	Other	0.3%

Dodge	Humphrey	44.4%
	Peterson	55.4%
	Other	0.2%

Douglas	Humphrey	54.7%
	Peterson	45.1%
	Other	0.2%

Faribault	Humphrey	43.4%
	Peterson	56.5%
	Other	0.1%

Fillmore	Humphrey	41.3%
	Peterson	58.5%
	Other	0.2%

Freeborn	Humphrey	54.1%
	Peterson	45.7%
	Other	0.2%

Goodhue	Humphrey	44.8%
	Peterson	54.9%
	Other	0.2%

Grant	Humphrey	58.7%
	Peterson	41.3%
	Other	0.1%

Hennepin	Humphrey	58.5%
	Peterson	41.3%
	Other	0.2%

Houston	Humphrey	46.2%
	Peterson	53.5%
	Other	0.3%

Hubbard	Humphrey	48.5%
	Peterson	51.2%
	Other	0.3%

Isanti	Humphrey	59.3%
	Peterson	40.4%
	Other	0.3%

Itasca	Humphrey	64.3%
	Peterson	35.4%
	Other	0.4%

Jackson	Humphrey	57.2%
	Peterson	42.6%
	Other	0.2%

Kanabec	Humphrey	52.8%
	Peterson	46.5%
	Other	0.7%

Kandiyohi	Humphrey	63.1%
	Peterson	36.8%
	Other	0.2%

Kittson	Humphrey	63.5%
	Peterson	36.3%
	Other	0.2%

Koochiching	Humphrey	68.8%
	Peterson	30.9%
	Other	0.3%

Lac Qui Parle	Humphrey	56.0%
	Peterson	43.9%
	Other	0.1%

Lake	Humphrey	68.7%
	Peterson	31.0%
	Other	0.2%

Lake of the Woods	Humphrey	63.1%
	Peterson	36.6%
	Other	0.3%

Le Sueur	Humphrey	56.2%
	Peterson	43.5%
	Other	0.3%

Lincoln	Humphrey	59.1%
	Peterson	40.6%
	Other	0.4%

Lyon	Humphrey	55.4%
	Peterson	44.4%
	Other	0.2%

McLeod	Humphrey	43.4%
	Peterson	56.4%
	Other	0.2%

Mahnomen	Humphrey	75.8%
	Peterson	23.7%
	Other	0.5%

Marshall	Humphrey	66.8%
	Peterson	32.9%
	Other	0.2%

Martin	Humphrey	36.7%
	Peterson	63.1%
	Other	0.2%

Meeker	Humphrey	51.5%
	Peterson	48.2%
	Other	0.2%

Mille Lacs	Humphrey	53.3%
	Peterson	46.3%
	Other	0.4%

Morrison	Humphrey	62.4%
	Peterson	37.2%
	Other	0.3%

Mower	Humphrey	55.5%
	Peterson	44.2%
	Other	0.3%

Murray	Humphrey	53.8%
	Peterson	45.9%
	Other	0.3%

Nicollet	Humphrey	49.1%
	Peterson	50.7%
	Other	0.2%

Nobles	Humphrey	54.9%
	Peterson	44.8%
	Other	0.3%

Norman	Humphrey	63.8%
	Peterson	36.0%
	Other	0.2%

Olmsted	Humphrey	46.4%
	Peterson	53.4%
	Other	0.2%

Otter Tail	Humphrey	42.1%
	Peterson	57.7%
	Other	0.2%

Pennington	Humphrey	65.9%
	Peterson	34.0%
	Other	0.1%

Pine	Humphrey	62.4%
	Peterson	37.4%
	Other	0.2%

Pipestone	Humphrey	48.9%
	Peterson	50.7%
	Other	0.4%

Polk	Humphrey	64.3%
	Peterson	35.6%
	Other	0.1%

Pope	Humphrey	57.1%
	Peterson	42.7%
	Other	0.2%

Ramsey	Humphrey	65.3%
	Peterson	34.4%
	Other	0.3%

Red Lake	Humphrey	77.9%
	Peterson	21.7%
	Other	0.4%

Redwood	Humphrey	41.9%
	Peterson	57.7%
	Other	0.3%

Renville	Humphrey	51.3%
	Peterson	48.4%
	Other	0.3%

Rice	Humphrey	48.8%
	Peterson	50.9%
	Other	0.3%

Rock	Humphrey	40.9%
	Peterson	59.0%
	Other	0.2%

Roseau	Humphrey	65.2%
	Peterson	34.5%
	Other	0.4%

St. Louis	Humphrey	66.2%
	Peterson	33.4%
	Other	0.5%

Scott	Humphrey	62.3%
	Peterson	37.4%
	Other	0.3%

Sherburne	Humphrey	54.2%
	Peterson	45.5%
	Other	0.3%

Sibley	Humphrey	39.4%
	Peterson	60.3%
	Other	0.3%

Stearns	Humphrey	55.6%
	Peterson	44.1%
	Other	0.3%

Steele	Humphrey	44.9%
	Peterson	54.8%
	Other	0.3%

Stevens	Humphrey	52.2%
	Peterson	47.6%
	Other	0.2%

Swift	Humphrey	65.5%
	Peterson	34.4%
	Other	0.1%

Todd	Humphrey	51.8%
	Peterson	47.9%
	Other	0.3%

Traverse	Humphrey	64.5%
	Peterson	35.1%
	Other	0.4%

Wabasha	Humphrey	46.9%
	Peterson	52.8%
	Other	0.3%

Wadena	Humphrey	45.7%
	Peterson	54.0%
	Other	0.3%

Waseca	Humphrey	42.3%
	Peterson	57.5%
	Other	0.2%

Washington	Humphrey	59.8%
	Peterson	39.9%
	Other	0.3%

Watonwan	Humphrey	43.8%
	Peterson	56.0%
	Other	0.1%

Wilkin	Humphrey	56.3%
	Peterson	43.4%
	Other	0.4%

Winona	Humphrey	50.7%
	Peterson	49.1%
	Other	0.3%

Wright	Humphrey	55.0%
	Peterson	44.7%
	Other	0.2%

Yellow Medicine	Humphrey	55.9%
	Peterson	43.9%
	Other	0.2%

National DataGraph for 1960 - Minnesota Results for 1960

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved