2020 Representative General Election Data Graphs - Michigan
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
AlconaFerguson27.7%
 
Huizenga71.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


AlgerFerguson38.2%
 
Huizenga60.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


AlleganFerguson30.3%
 
Huizenga65.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.9%
 


AlpenaFerguson32.2%
 
Huizenga66.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


AntrimFerguson33.2%
 
Huizenga65.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


ArenacFerguson35.1%
 
Huizenga60.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.3%
 


BaragaFerguson33.4%
 
Huizenga65.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


BarryFerguson34.3%
 
Huizenga65.7%
 
0.0%
 


BayFerguson46.0%
 
Huizenga50.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.8%
 


BenzieFerguson40.6%
 
Huizenga58.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


BerrienFerguson39.8%
 
Huizenga55.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.3%
 


BranchFerguson29.4%
 
Huizenga70.6%
 
0.0%
 


CalhounFerguson45.1%
 
Huizenga54.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.0%
 


CassFerguson30.3%
 
Huizenga64.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.8%
 


CharlevoixFerguson35.7%
 
Huizenga62.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


CheboyganFerguson29.9%
 
Huizenga68.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


ChippewaFerguson33.2%
 
Huizenga65.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


ClareFerguson28.5%
 
Huizenga68.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.5%
 


ClintonFerguson40.5%
 
Huizenga56.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


CrawfordFerguson28.9%
 
Huizenga69.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


DeltaFerguson33.0%
 
Huizenga65.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


DickinsonFerguson30.0%
 
Huizenga68.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


EatonFerguson47.6%
 
Huizenga52.4%
 
0.0%
 


EmmetFerguson38.8%
 
Huizenga59.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


GeneseeFerguson57.6%
 
Huizenga38.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.7%
 


GladwinFerguson26.5%
 
Huizenga71.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


GogebicFerguson41.0%
 
Huizenga57.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


Grand TraverseFerguson43.0%
 
Huizenga55.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


GratiotFerguson29.7%
 
Huizenga67.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


HillsdaleFerguson24.3%
 
Huizenga75.7%
 
0.0%
 


HoughtonFerguson38.3%
 
Huizenga60.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


HuronFerguson28.1%
 
Huizenga71.9%
 
0.0%
 


InghamFerguson67.3%
 
Huizenga30.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


IoniaFerguson35.4%
 
Huizenga64.6%
 
0.0%
 


IoscoFerguson37.8%
 
Huizenga58.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.0%
 


IronFerguson34.4%
 
Huizenga64.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


IsabellaFerguson42.1%
 
Huizenga54.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


JacksonFerguson38.7%
 
Huizenga61.3%
 
0.0%
 


KalamazooFerguson50.5%
 
Huizenga46.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.5%
 


KalkaskaFerguson25.8%
 
Huizenga72.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


KentFerguson49.7%
 
Huizenga49.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


KeweenawFerguson38.9%
 
Huizenga59.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


LakeFerguson32.6%
 
Huizenga63.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.5%
 


LapeerFerguson30.4%
 
Huizenga69.6%
 
0.0%
 


LeelanauFerguson46.9%
 
Huizenga52.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


LenaweeFerguson38.9%
 
Huizenga61.1%
 
0.0%
 


LivingstonFerguson40.1%
 
Huizenga58.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


LuceFerguson24.9%
 
Huizenga73.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


MackinacFerguson33.1%
 
Huizenga65.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


MacombFerguson46.4%
 
Huizenga51.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


ManisteeFerguson37.1%
 
Huizenga61.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


MarquetteFerguson52.0%
 
Huizenga46.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


MasonFerguson34.6%
 
Huizenga63.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.2%
 


MecostaFerguson31.1%
 
Huizenga65.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


MenomineeFerguson33.9%
 
Huizenga64.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


MidlandFerguson34.5%
 
Huizenga63.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


MissaukeeFerguson19.5%
 
Huizenga78.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


MonroeFerguson38.7%
 
Huizenga61.3%
 
0.0%
 


MontcalmFerguson27.7%
 
Huizenga69.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


MontmorencyFerguson24.4%
 
Huizenga73.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


MuskegonFerguson44.3%
 
Huizenga52.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.9%
 


NewaygoFerguson25.3%
 
Huizenga71.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


OaklandFerguson56.3%
 
Huizenga41.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.2%
 


OceanaFerguson30.4%
 
Huizenga66.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.3%
 


OgemawFerguson25.8%
 
Huizenga71.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


OntonagonFerguson33.4%
 
Huizenga65.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


OsceolaFerguson22.7%
 
Huizenga74.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.5%
 


OscodaFerguson24.2%
 
Huizenga74.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


OtsegoFerguson27.7%
 
Huizenga70.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


OttawaFerguson33.5%
 
Huizenga64.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


Presque IsleFerguson30.7%
 
Huizenga68.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


RoscommonFerguson30.8%
 
Huizenga67.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


SaginawFerguson47.2%
 
Huizenga49.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


St. ClairFerguson34.1%
 
Huizenga65.9%
 
0.0%
 


St. JosephFerguson27.4%
 
Huizenga66.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other6.3%
 


SanilacFerguson26.4%
 
Huizenga73.6%
 
0.0%
 


SchoolcraftFerguson30.0%
 
Huizenga68.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


ShiawasseeFerguson34.6%
 
Huizenga62.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.0%
 


TuscolaFerguson31.3%
 
Huizenga67.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


Van BurenFerguson35.6%
 
Huizenga60.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.0%
 


WashtenawFerguson71.9%
 
Huizenga26.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


WayneFerguson69.0%
 
Huizenga28.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.0%
 


WexfordFerguson27.9%
 
Huizenga69.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.0%
 



National DataGraph for 2020 - Michigan Results for 2020

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved