Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-03-26

Map

Map

Allen	Rezac	25.7%
	Thornburgh	65.1%
	Other	9.3%

Anderson	Rezac	27.3%
	Thornburgh	61.9%
	Other	10.8%

Atchison	Rezac	41.0%
	Thornburgh	51.0%
	Other	8.0%

Barber	Rezac	18.6%
	Thornburgh	67.8%
	Other	13.6%

Barton	Rezac	19.1%
	Thornburgh	73.2%
	Other	7.7%

Bourbon	Rezac	30.1%
	Thornburgh	59.2%
	Other	10.8%

Brown	Rezac	19.7%
	Thornburgh	71.7%
	Other	8.5%

Butler	Rezac	22.3%
	Thornburgh	64.3%
	Other	13.4%

Chase	Rezac	25.1%
	Thornburgh	65.4%
	Other	9.5%

Chautauqua	Rezac	22.8%
	Thornburgh	68.5%
	Other	8.7%

Cherokee	Rezac	37.8%
	Thornburgh	50.5%
	Other	11.7%

Cheyenne	Rezac	18.2%
	Thornburgh	74.8%
	Other	6.9%

Clark	Rezac	14.8%
	Thornburgh	74.3%
	Other	10.9%

Clay	Rezac	15.3%
	Thornburgh	79.3%
	Other	5.5%

Cloud	Rezac	22.3%
	Thornburgh	70.7%
	Other	7.0%

Coffey	Rezac	18.7%
	Thornburgh	74.2%
	Other	7.1%

Comanche	Rezac	15.6%
	Thornburgh	75.2%
	Other	9.1%

Cowley	Rezac	28.8%
	Thornburgh	60.3%
	Other	11.0%

Crawford	Rezac	39.2%
	Thornburgh	48.7%
	Other	12.1%

Decatur	Rezac	17.7%
	Thornburgh	75.7%
	Other	6.6%

Dickinson	Rezac	20.7%
	Thornburgh	70.7%
	Other	8.6%

Doniphan	Rezac	23.8%
	Thornburgh	64.4%
	Other	11.8%

Douglas	Rezac	38.2%
	Thornburgh	54.4%
	Other	7.5%

Edwards	Rezac	21.5%
	Thornburgh	70.8%
	Other	7.6%

Elk	Rezac	24.6%
	Thornburgh	65.2%
	Other	10.2%

Ellis	Rezac	32.3%
	Thornburgh	57.4%
	Other	10.3%

Ellsworth	Rezac	25.4%
	Thornburgh	68.5%
	Other	6.1%

Finney	Rezac	18.4%
	Thornburgh	72.4%
	Other	9.2%

Ford	Rezac	19.1%
	Thornburgh	74.3%
	Other	6.6%

Franklin	Rezac	26.7%
	Thornburgh	64.4%
	Other	8.9%

Geary	Rezac	27.7%
	Thornburgh	66.9%
	Other	5.4%

Gove	Rezac	18.2%
	Thornburgh	74.6%
	Other	7.2%

Graham	Rezac	20.5%
	Thornburgh	72.0%
	Other	7.6%

Grant	Rezac	16.0%
	Thornburgh	77.3%
	Other	6.7%

Gray	Rezac	15.6%
	Thornburgh	78.9%
	Other	5.5%

Greeley	Rezac	13.5%
	Thornburgh	76.7%
	Other	9.8%

Greenwood	Rezac	23.2%
	Thornburgh	68.8%
	Other	7.9%

Hamilton	Rezac	16.0%
	Thornburgh	76.9%
	Other	7.1%

Harper	Rezac	23.2%
	Thornburgh	61.5%
	Other	15.3%

Harvey	Rezac	24.1%
	Thornburgh	64.6%
	Other	11.4%

Haskell	Rezac	13.6%
	Thornburgh	78.8%
	Other	7.6%

Hodgeman	Rezac	21.1%
	Thornburgh	72.8%
	Other	6.1%

Jackson	Rezac	34.1%
	Thornburgh	60.7%
	Other	5.2%

Jefferson	Rezac	31.6%
	Thornburgh	60.3%
	Other	8.1%

Jewell	Rezac	14.9%
	Thornburgh	78.0%
	Other	7.1%

Johnson	Rezac	24.8%
	Thornburgh	67.2%
	Other	8.0%

Kearny	Rezac	15.1%
	Thornburgh	76.5%
	Other	8.4%

Kingman	Rezac	20.0%
	Thornburgh	70.3%
	Other	9.7%

Kiowa	Rezac	13.7%
	Thornburgh	78.3%
	Other	8.0%

Labette	Rezac	32.2%
	Thornburgh	59.1%
	Other	8.6%

Lane	Rezac	13.6%
	Thornburgh	80.4%
	Other	6.1%

Leavenworth	Rezac	34.3%
	Thornburgh	56.0%
	Other	9.6%

Lincoln	Rezac	14.6%
	Thornburgh	77.5%
	Other	7.9%

Linn	Rezac	31.0%
	Thornburgh	60.6%
	Other	8.4%

Logan	Rezac	12.2%
	Thornburgh	77.5%
	Other	10.3%

Lyon	Rezac	26.4%
	Thornburgh	66.1%
	Other	7.5%

McPherson	Rezac	20.2%
	Thornburgh	71.3%
	Other	8.5%

Marion	Rezac	18.2%
	Thornburgh	75.3%
	Other	6.5%

Marshall	Rezac	34.2%
	Thornburgh	60.5%
	Other	5.3%

Meade	Rezac	13.8%
	Thornburgh	77.4%
	Other	8.8%

Miami	Rezac	32.9%
	Thornburgh	56.9%
	Other	10.3%

Mitchell	Rezac	18.2%
	Thornburgh	75.0%
	Other	6.9%

Montgomery	Rezac	28.7%
	Thornburgh	61.7%
	Other	9.6%

Morris	Rezac	28.3%
	Thornburgh	65.7%
	Other	5.9%

Morton	Rezac	19.3%
	Thornburgh	71.5%
	Other	9.2%

Nemaha	Rezac	32.8%
	Thornburgh	61.0%
	Other	6.2%

Neosho	Rezac	26.4%
	Thornburgh	63.7%
	Other	9.9%

Ness	Rezac	14.6%
	Thornburgh	79.4%
	Other	6.0%

Norton	Rezac	17.1%
	Thornburgh	75.2%
	Other	7.8%

Osage	Rezac	22.7%
	Thornburgh	71.8%
	Other	5.5%

Osborne	Rezac	18.2%
	Thornburgh	75.4%
	Other	6.4%

Ottawa	Rezac	15.3%
	Thornburgh	77.1%
	Other	7.6%

Pawnee	Rezac	19.9%
	Thornburgh	73.0%
	Other	7.0%

Phillips	Rezac	16.0%
	Thornburgh	77.9%
	Other	6.1%

Pottawatomie	Rezac	37.9%
	Thornburgh	58.2%
	Other	3.9%

Pratt	Rezac	22.4%
	Thornburgh	69.0%
	Other	8.5%

Rawlins	Rezac	15.8%
	Thornburgh	78.1%
	Other	6.0%

Reno	Rezac	25.3%
	Thornburgh	66.2%
	Other	8.5%

Republic	Rezac	19.1%
	Thornburgh	74.5%
	Other	6.5%

Rice	Rezac	21.0%
	Thornburgh	71.1%
	Other	7.9%

Riley	Rezac	28.9%
	Thornburgh	66.7%
	Other	4.4%

Rooks	Rezac	17.1%
	Thornburgh	74.1%
	Other	8.9%

Rush	Rezac	19.2%
	Thornburgh	73.1%
	Other	7.8%

Russell	Rezac	16.3%
	Thornburgh	77.4%
	Other	6.3%

Saline	Rezac	22.8%
	Thornburgh	68.6%
	Other	8.5%

Scott	Rezac	12.5%
	Thornburgh	79.5%
	Other	8.0%

Sedgwick	Rezac	27.3%
	Thornburgh	61.2%
	Other	11.5%

Seward	Rezac	15.2%
	Thornburgh	77.2%
	Other	7.6%

Shawnee	Rezac	29.4%
	Thornburgh	65.1%
	Other	5.5%

Sheridan	Rezac	15.6%
	Thornburgh	77.1%
	Other	7.3%

Sherman	Rezac	19.4%
	Thornburgh	73.6%
	Other	7.0%

Smith	Rezac	18.4%
	Thornburgh	76.7%
	Other	5.0%

Stafford	Rezac	18.4%
	Thornburgh	75.0%
	Other	6.6%

Stanton	Rezac	14.5%
	Thornburgh	79.7%
	Other	5.8%

Stevens	Rezac	14.3%
	Thornburgh	78.0%
	Other	7.7%

Sumner	Rezac	26.9%
	Thornburgh	62.7%
	Other	10.4%

Thomas	Rezac	17.4%
	Thornburgh	75.1%
	Other	7.5%

Trego	Rezac	21.9%
	Thornburgh	71.7%
	Other	6.4%

Wabaunsee	Rezac	40.7%
	Thornburgh	54.7%
	Other	4.6%

Wallace	Rezac	10.7%
	Thornburgh	77.8%
	Other	11.5%

Washington	Rezac	15.8%
	Thornburgh	80.7%
	Other	3.4%

Wichita	Rezac	14.9%
	Thornburgh	78.0%
	Other	7.1%

Wilson	Rezac	20.1%
	Thornburgh	70.2%
	Other	9.7%

Woodson	Rezac	24.7%
	Thornburgh	65.9%
	Other	9.4%

Wyandotte	Rezac	56.5%
	Thornburgh	32.2%
	Other	11.3%

National DataGraph for 1998 - Kansas Results for 1998

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved