1966 Senatorial General Election Data Graphs - Kansas
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2023-05-04

Map

AllenBreeding43.6%
 
Pearson54.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


AndersonBreeding45.9%
 
Pearson52.1%
 
Other2.0%
 


AtchisonBreeding52.0%
 
Pearson46.5%
 
Other1.5%
 


BarberBreeding44.4%
 
Pearson53.9%
 
Other1.6%
 


BartonBreeding51.5%
 
Pearson46.1%
 
Other2.4%
 


BourbonBreeding47.6%
 
Pearson49.9%
 
Other2.5%
 


BrownBreeding37.1%
 
Pearson61.4%
 
Other1.5%
 


ButlerBreeding50.2%
 
Pearson47.7%
 
Other2.0%
 


ChaseBreeding42.3%
 
Pearson55.4%
 
Other2.3%
 


ChautauquaBreeding33.2%
 
Pearson64.5%
 
Other2.3%
 


CherokeeBreeding51.5%
 
Pearson45.6%
 
Other2.9%
 


CheyenneBreeding34.1%
 
Pearson62.7%
 
Other3.2%
 


ClarkBreeding43.6%
 
Pearson53.9%
 
Other2.5%
 


ClayBreeding35.0%
 
Pearson62.7%
 
Other2.3%
 


CloudBreeding44.0%
 
Pearson53.9%
 
Other2.1%
 


CoffeyBreeding40.1%
 
Pearson58.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


ComancheBreeding43.1%
 
Pearson55.1%
 
Other1.7%
 


CowleyBreeding47.7%
 
Pearson50.7%
 
Other1.6%
 


CrawfordBreeding50.6%
 
Pearson47.1%
 
Other2.3%
 


DecaturBreeding40.5%
 
Pearson58.6%
 
Other0.9%
 


DickinsonBreeding41.4%
 
Pearson55.8%
 
Other2.8%
 


DoniphanBreeding34.2%
 
Pearson64.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


DouglasBreeding41.8%
 
Pearson54.2%
 
Other4.0%
 


EdwardsBreeding50.6%
 
Pearson47.9%
 
Other1.5%
 


ElkBreeding35.8%
 
Pearson61.6%
 
Other2.6%
 


EllisBreeding59.2%
 
Pearson38.8%
 
Other2.0%
 


EllsworthBreeding48.1%
 
Pearson50.7%
 
Other1.2%
 


FinneyBreeding46.5%
 
Pearson52.2%
 
Other1.3%
 


FordBreeding55.3%
 
Pearson42.6%
 
Other2.1%
 


FranklinBreeding42.9%
 
Pearson53.4%
 
Other3.7%
 


GearyBreeding45.3%
 
Pearson51.7%
 
Other3.0%
 


GoveBreeding47.1%
 
Pearson50.6%
 
Other2.4%
 


GrahamBreeding40.4%
 
Pearson57.3%
 
Other2.3%
 


GrantBreeding46.2%
 
Pearson52.4%
 
Other1.4%
 


GrayBreeding51.7%
 
Pearson47.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


GreeleyBreeding40.6%
 
Pearson58.4%
 
Other1.0%
 


GreenwoodBreeding39.2%
 
Pearson59.2%
 
Other1.6%
 


HamiltonBreeding49.9%
 
Pearson49.4%
 
Other0.7%
 


HarperBreeding38.1%
 
Pearson59.9%
 
Other2.0%
 


HarveyBreeding42.6%
 
Pearson54.7%
 
Other2.7%
 


HaskellBreeding50.7%
 
Pearson47.6%
 
Other1.8%
 


HodgemanBreeding47.0%
 
Pearson50.6%
 
Other2.4%
 


JacksonBreeding40.4%
 
Pearson57.9%
 
Other1.7%
 


JeffersonBreeding42.9%
 
Pearson53.6%
 
Other3.5%
 


JewellBreeding32.9%
 
Pearson64.3%
 
Other2.8%
 


JohnsonBreeding35.5%
 
Pearson61.9%
 
Other2.6%
 


KearnyBreeding45.4%
 
Pearson53.6%
 
Other1.0%
 


KingmanBreeding47.5%
 
Pearson50.5%
 
Other2.0%
 


KiowaBreeding39.3%
 
Pearson58.7%
 
Other2.0%
 


LabetteBreeding47.1%
 
Pearson50.6%
 
Other2.3%
 


LaneBreeding42.2%
 
Pearson56.6%
 
Other1.1%
 


LeavenworthBreeding48.8%
 
Pearson49.4%
 
Other1.8%
 


LincolnBreeding38.2%
 
Pearson60.3%
 
Other1.5%
 


LinnBreeding36.0%
 
Pearson62.3%
 
Other1.7%
 


LoganBreeding38.0%
 
Pearson59.8%
 
Other2.2%
 


LyonBreeding45.2%
 
Pearson52.3%
 
Other2.5%
 


McPhersonBreeding37.5%
 
Pearson59.5%
 
Other3.0%
 


MarionBreeding35.2%
 
Pearson61.5%
 
Other3.2%
 


MarshallBreeding45.6%
 
Pearson53.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


MeadeBreeding45.8%
 
Pearson52.4%
 
Other1.8%
 


MiamiBreeding48.5%
 
Pearson49.5%
 
Other1.9%
 


MitchellBreeding44.9%
 
Pearson53.3%
 
Other1.8%
 


MontgomeryBreeding44.6%
 
Pearson52.7%
 
Other2.7%
 


MorrisBreeding41.2%
 
Pearson56.3%
 
Other2.4%
 


MortonBreeding59.6%
 
Pearson39.3%
 
Other1.1%
 


NemahaBreeding52.4%
 
Pearson46.2%
 
Other1.4%
 


NeoshoBreeding46.1%
 
Pearson51.8%
 
Other2.1%
 


NessBreeding47.4%
 
Pearson51.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


NortonBreeding31.8%
 
Pearson67.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


OsageBreeding48.4%
 
Pearson49.8%
 
Other1.9%
 


OsborneBreeding37.1%
 
Pearson62.1%
 
Other0.8%
 


OttawaBreeding39.6%
 
Pearson57.2%
 
Other3.2%
 


PawneeBreeding53.6%
 
Pearson44.8%
 
Other1.6%
 


PhillipsBreeding33.1%
 
Pearson64.5%
 
Other2.4%
 


PottawatomieBreeding42.6%
 
Pearson55.8%
 
Other1.5%
 


PrattBreeding45.6%
 
Pearson52.8%
 
Other1.6%
 


RawlinsBreeding37.7%
 
Pearson59.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


RenoBreeding51.2%
 
Pearson46.4%
 
Other2.4%
 


RepublicBreeding39.0%
 
Pearson59.3%
 
Other1.7%
 


RiceBreeding47.6%
 
Pearson50.7%
 
Other1.7%
 


RileyBreeding34.5%
 
Pearson59.9%
 
Other5.6%
 


RooksBreeding41.2%
 
Pearson55.9%
 
Other2.8%
 


RushBreeding51.1%
 
Pearson47.2%
 
Other1.6%
 


RussellBreeding39.2%
 
Pearson58.4%
 
Other2.3%
 


SalineBreeding43.2%
 
Pearson54.3%
 
Other2.5%
 


ScottBreeding39.5%
 
Pearson58.5%
 
Other2.1%
 


SedgwickBreeding46.6%
 
Pearson49.6%
 
Other3.8%
 


SewardBreeding45.3%
 
Pearson53.1%
 
Other1.6%
 


ShawneeBreeding48.0%
 
Pearson50.3%
 
Other1.7%
 


SheridanBreeding49.7%
 
Pearson48.6%
 
Other1.8%
 


ShermanBreeding43.5%
 
Pearson53.0%
 
Other3.5%
 


SmithBreeding35.2%
 
Pearson62.3%
 
Other2.5%
 


StaffordBreeding49.5%
 
Pearson48.9%
 
Other1.6%
 


StantonBreeding46.8%
 
Pearson52.2%
 
Other1.0%
 


StevensBreeding43.6%
 
Pearson54.7%
 
Other1.7%
 


SumnerBreeding52.6%
 
Pearson45.5%
 
Other1.9%
 


ThomasBreeding45.5%
 
Pearson52.2%
 
Other2.3%
 


TregoBreeding44.9%
 
Pearson51.4%
 
Other3.8%
 


WabaunseeBreeding39.9%
 
Pearson57.3%
 
Other2.8%
 


WallaceBreeding33.3%
 
Pearson61.2%
 
Other5.5%
 


WashingtonBreeding37.2%
 
Pearson61.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


WichitaBreeding47.3%
 
Pearson50.6%
 
Other2.2%
 


WilsonBreeding36.0%
 
Pearson61.4%
 
Other2.7%
 


WoodsonBreeding40.9%
 
Pearson56.6%
 
Other2.5%
 


WyandotteBreeding55.3%
 
Pearson39.0%
 
Other5.7%
 



National DataGraph for 1966 - Kansas Results for 1966

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved