Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-07-01

Map

Map

Adair	Judge	46.4%
	Askew	45.8%
	Other	7.8%

Adams	Judge	47.4%
	Askew	48.8%
	Other	3.7%

Allamakee	Judge	45.8%
	Askew	48.0%
	Other	6.2%

Appanoose	Judge	58.6%
	Askew	39.3%
	Other	2.1%

Audubon	Judge	51.4%
	Askew	44.8%
	Other	3.7%

Benton	Judge	50.1%
	Askew	45.9%
	Other	4.0%

Black Hawk	Judge	54.1%
	Askew	42.1%
	Other	3.8%

Boone	Judge	57.3%
	Askew	38.9%
	Other	3.8%

Bremer	Judge	44.9%
	Askew	50.8%
	Other	4.3%

Buchanan	Judge	53.3%
	Askew	42.3%
	Other	4.4%

Buena Vista	Judge	39.3%
	Askew	56.2%
	Other	4.5%

Butler	Judge	39.5%
	Askew	53.5%
	Other	7.0%

Calhoun	Judge	46.9%
	Askew	48.6%
	Other	4.5%

Carroll	Judge	52.8%
	Askew	44.0%
	Other	3.3%

Cass	Judge	36.8%
	Askew	59.4%
	Other	3.8%

Cedar	Judge	48.8%
	Askew	45.8%
	Other	5.4%

Cerro Gordo	Judge	52.0%
	Askew	43.0%
	Other	5.0%

Cherokee	Judge	40.8%
	Askew	54.3%
	Other	4.9%

Chickasaw	Judge	53.4%
	Askew	41.3%
	Other	5.3%

Clarke	Judge	55.4%
	Askew	41.7%
	Other	2.9%

Clay	Judge	41.5%
	Askew	53.6%
	Other	4.9%

Clayton	Judge	51.6%
	Askew	43.6%
	Other	4.8%

Clinton	Judge	53.3%
	Askew	42.5%
	Other	4.2%

Crawford	Judge	45.1%
	Askew	53.1%
	Other	1.9%

Dallas	Judge	49.0%
	Askew	47.4%
	Other	3.6%

Davis	Judge	54.5%
	Askew	40.8%
	Other	4.6%

Decatur	Judge	54.9%
	Askew	41.1%
	Other	4.0%

Delaware	Judge	48.8%
	Askew	49.1%
	Other	2.1%

Des Moines	Judge	58.0%
	Askew	38.1%
	Other	3.9%

Dickinson	Judge	42.7%
	Askew	52.6%
	Other	4.8%

Dubuque	Judge	58.1%
	Askew	37.2%
	Other	4.7%

Emmet	Judge	50.2%
	Askew	45.7%
	Other	4.2%

Fayette	Judge	51.1%
	Askew	45.4%
	Other	3.5%

Floyd	Judge	50.8%
	Askew	42.5%
	Other	6.7%

Franklin	Judge	39.3%
	Askew	45.9%
	Other	14.8%

Fremont	Judge	29.3%
	Askew	67.4%
	Other	3.3%

Greene	Judge	55.3%
	Askew	41.0%
	Other	3.8%

Grundy	Judge	37.7%
	Askew	59.6%
	Other	2.7%

Guthrie	Judge	50.0%
	Askew	46.0%
	Other	4.0%

Hamilton	Judge	48.2%
	Askew	47.4%
	Other	4.3%

Hancock	Judge	42.3%
	Askew	53.2%
	Other	4.5%

Hardin	Judge	46.9%
	Askew	49.0%
	Other	4.1%

Harrison	Judge	42.0%
	Askew	52.8%
	Other	5.3%

Henry	Judge	43.5%
	Askew	51.7%
	Other	4.8%

Howard	Judge	52.6%
	Askew	42.3%
	Other	5.2%

Humboldt	Judge	44.8%
	Askew	51.5%
	Other	3.7%

Ida	Judge	38.9%
	Askew	58.5%
	Other	2.6%

Iowa	Judge	47.7%
	Askew	47.9%
	Other	4.4%

Jackson	Judge	55.9%
	Askew	39.2%
	Other	4.9%

Jasper	Judge	56.5%
	Askew	40.5%
	Other	3.0%

Jefferson	Judge	40.5%
	Askew	43.7%
	Other	15.8%

Johnson	Judge	56.4%
	Askew	33.4%
	Other	10.2%

Jones	Judge	50.2%
	Askew	45.7%
	Other	4.1%

Keokuk	Judge	53.5%
	Askew	45.2%
	Other	1.3%

Kossuth	Judge	52.8%
	Askew	42.6%
	Other	4.6%

Lee	Judge	56.1%
	Askew	37.0%
	Other	6.9%

Linn	Judge	51.5%
	Askew	44.9%
	Other	3.6%

Louisa	Judge	47.9%
	Askew	47.1%
	Other	5.1%

Lucas	Judge	55.4%
	Askew	42.3%
	Other	2.4%

Lyon	Judge	23.9%
	Askew	73.4%
	Other	2.8%

Madison	Judge	49.0%
	Askew	46.7%
	Other	4.3%

Mahaska	Judge	46.1%
	Askew	51.9%
	Other	2.0%

Marion	Judge	46.6%
	Askew	51.1%
	Other	2.3%

Marshall	Judge	51.5%
	Askew	45.1%
	Other	3.5%

Mills	Judge	27.7%
	Askew	67.4%
	Other	4.9%

Mitchell	Judge	47.5%
	Askew	48.5%
	Other	4.0%

Monona	Judge	44.8%
	Askew	50.1%
	Other	5.0%

Monroe	Judge	72.0%
	Askew	26.6%
	Other	1.4%

Montgomery	Judge	31.9%
	Askew	62.8%
	Other	5.3%

Muscatine	Judge	46.5%
	Askew	47.6%
	Other	6.0%

O'Brien	Judge	30.0%
	Askew	66.7%
	Other	3.3%

Osceola	Judge	29.5%
	Askew	66.9%
	Other	3.6%

Page	Judge	26.4%
	Askew	70.3%
	Other	3.3%

Palo Alto	Judge	56.3%
	Askew	40.4%
	Other	3.3%

Plymouth	Judge	33.3%
	Askew	62.7%
	Other	4.0%

Pocahontas	Judge	42.8%
	Askew	46.7%
	Other	10.5%

Polk	Judge	54.9%
	Askew	41.2%
	Other	3.9%

Pottawattamie	Judge	39.8%
	Askew	54.5%
	Other	5.7%

Poweshiek	Judge	53.6%
	Askew	42.0%
	Other	4.4%

Ringgold	Judge	54.6%
	Askew	43.1%
	Other	2.3%

Sac	Judge	38.7%
	Askew	56.3%
	Other	5.1%

Scott	Judge	49.0%
	Askew	45.7%
	Other	5.4%

Shelby	Judge	38.5%
	Askew	57.2%
	Other	4.3%

Sioux	Judge	14.5%
	Askew	84.7%
	Other	0.9%

Story	Judge	52.7%
	Askew	41.7%
	Other	5.6%

Tama	Judge	52.0%
	Askew	44.1%
	Other	3.9%

Taylor	Judge	45.3%
	Askew	51.3%
	Other	3.4%

Union	Judge	49.8%
	Askew	46.0%
	Other	4.1%

Van Buren	Judge	43.7%
	Askew	50.4%
	Other	5.8%

Wapello	Judge	65.2%
	Askew	31.2%
	Other	3.6%

Warren	Judge	54.5%
	Askew	42.3%
	Other	3.3%

Washington	Judge	46.0%
	Askew	49.2%
	Other	4.8%

Wayne	Judge	53.3%
	Askew	45.1%
	Other	1.6%

Webster	Judge	54.7%
	Askew	41.0%
	Other	4.3%

Winnebago	Judge	46.2%
	Askew	48.4%
	Other	5.4%

Winneshiek	Judge	46.9%
	Askew	46.5%
	Other	6.7%

Woodbury	Judge	43.5%
	Askew	51.8%
	Other	4.6%

Worth	Judge	49.6%
	Askew	44.0%
	Other	6.4%

Wright	Judge	46.6%
	Askew	51.6%
	Other	1.8%

National DataGraph for 2002 - Iowa Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved