Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2017-10-28

Map

Map

Adair	Brunow	36.1%
	Smith	63.9%
	Other	0.0%

Adams	Brunow	41.9%
	Smith	58.1%

Allamakee	Brunow	31.5%
	Smith	68.3%
	Other	0.2%

Appanoose	Brunow	62.8%
	Smith	37.2%
	Other	0.0%

Audubon	Brunow	42.4%
	Smith	57.3%
	Other	0.3%

Benton	Brunow	43.6%
	Smith	56.1%
	Other	0.3%

Black Hawk	Brunow	40.4%
	Smith	59.3%
	Other	0.3%

Boone	Brunow	44.3%
	Smith	55.4%
	Other	0.3%

Bremer	Brunow	32.2%
	Smith	67.5%
	Other	0.3%

Buchanan	Brunow	38.4%
	Smith	61.6%
	Other	0.1%

Buena Vista	Brunow	38.6%
	Smith	61.2%
	Other	0.2%

Butler	Brunow	24.3%
	Smith	75.7%
	Other	0.1%

Calhoun	Brunow	36.7%
	Smith	63.0%
	Other	0.3%

Carroll	Brunow	50.3%
	Smith	49.5%
	Other	0.2%

Cass	Brunow	32.1%
	Smith	67.6%
	Other	0.3%

Cedar	Brunow	35.6%
	Smith	64.2%
	Other	0.2%

Cerro Gordo	Brunow	38.4%
	Smith	61.3%
	Other	0.4%

Cherokee	Brunow	39.1%
	Smith	60.8%
	Other	0.1%

Chickasaw	Brunow	43.0%
	Smith	56.9%
	Other	0.0%

Clarke	Brunow	48.3%
	Smith	51.7%

Clay	Brunow	35.9%
	Smith	63.8%
	Other	0.3%

Clayton	Brunow	39.7%
	Smith	59.8%
	Other	0.5%

Clinton	Brunow	42.4%
	Smith	57.2%
	Other	0.4%

Crawford	Brunow	37.7%
	Smith	62.0%
	Other	0.3%

Dallas	Brunow	44.7%
	Smith	55.2%
	Other	0.1%

Davis	Brunow	47.9%
	Smith	52.1%

Decatur	Brunow	46.3%
	Smith	53.6%
	Other	0.1%

Delaware	Brunow	37.8%
	Smith	62.0%
	Other	0.3%

Des Moines	Brunow	45.0%
	Smith	54.7%
	Other	0.2%

Dickinson	Brunow	34.8%
	Smith	64.7%
	Other	0.5%

Dubuque	Brunow	53.2%
	Smith	46.4%
	Other	0.4%

Emmet	Brunow	38.8%
	Smith	61.2%
	Other	0.0%

Fayette	Brunow	39.5%
	Smith	60.3%
	Other	0.3%

Floyd	Brunow	40.5%
	Smith	59.3%
	Other	0.2%

Franklin	Brunow	28.3%
	Smith	71.4%
	Other	0.3%

Fremont	Brunow	39.2%
	Smith	60.7%
	Other	0.2%

Greene	Brunow	44.8%
	Smith	55.0%
	Other	0.2%

Grundy	Brunow	27.1%
	Smith	72.7%
	Other	0.2%

Guthrie	Brunow	40.4%
	Smith	59.3%
	Other	0.3%

Hamilton	Brunow	34.6%
	Smith	65.2%
	Other	0.2%

Hancock	Brunow	30.9%
	Smith	69.1%
	Other	0.1%

Hardin	Brunow	32.8%
	Smith	67.1%
	Other	0.1%

Harrison	Brunow	42.3%
	Smith	57.6%
	Other	0.0%

Henry	Brunow	37.6%
	Smith	62.4%
	Other	0.1%

Howard	Brunow	42.6%
	Smith	57.2%
	Other	0.1%

Humboldt	Brunow	36.1%
	Smith	63.9%
	Other	0.1%

Ida	Brunow	32.3%
	Smith	67.6%
	Other	0.0%

Iowa	Brunow	40.1%
	Smith	59.3%
	Other	0.5%

Jackson	Brunow	43.0%
	Smith	56.4%
	Other	0.6%

Jasper	Brunow	40.6%
	Smith	59.2%
	Other	0.2%

Jefferson	Brunow	31.9%
	Smith	68.0%
	Other	0.1%

Johnson	Brunow	46.3%
	Smith	51.0%
	Other	2.7%

Jones	Brunow	41.7%
	Smith	58.2%
	Other	0.1%

Keokuk	Brunow	41.1%
	Smith	58.8%
	Other	0.1%

Kossuth	Brunow	39.4%
	Smith	60.3%
	Other	0.3%

Lee	Brunow	47.7%
	Smith	52.0%
	Other	0.3%

Linn	Brunow	44.4%
	Smith	55.1%
	Other	0.5%

Louisa	Brunow	32.8%
	Smith	67.1%
	Other	0.1%

Lucas	Brunow	50.0%
	Smith	50.0%
	Other	0.0%

Lyon	Brunow	24.7%
	Smith	74.8%
	Other	0.6%

Madison	Brunow	42.4%
	Smith	57.5%
	Other	0.1%

Mahaska	Brunow	33.8%
	Smith	65.7%
	Other	0.4%

Marion	Brunow	41.2%
	Smith	58.6%
	Other	0.2%

Marshall	Brunow	36.2%
	Smith	63.4%
	Other	0.3%

Mills	Brunow	32.5%
	Smith	67.2%
	Other	0.4%

Mitchell	Brunow	34.5%
	Smith	65.1%
	Other	0.4%

Monona	Brunow	45.4%
	Smith	54.4%
	Other	0.2%

Monroe	Brunow	53.7%
	Smith	46.2%
	Other	0.1%

Montgomery	Brunow	29.7%
	Smith	70.0%
	Other	0.3%

Muscatine	Brunow	37.7%
	Smith	61.8%
	Other	0.5%

O'Brien	Brunow	27.4%
	Smith	72.4%
	Other	0.2%

Osceola	Brunow	32.5%
	Smith	67.1%
	Other	0.4%

Page	Brunow	27.7%
	Smith	72.2%
	Other	0.2%

Palo Alto	Brunow	48.4%
	Smith	51.4%
	Other	0.1%

Plymouth	Brunow	32.7%
	Smith	67.1%
	Other	0.2%

Pocahontas	Brunow	40.0%
	Smith	59.8%
	Other	0.2%

Polk	Brunow	47.1%
	Smith	52.6%
	Other	0.3%

Pottawattamie	Brunow	40.2%
	Smith	59.4%
	Other	0.5%

Poweshiek	Brunow	37.7%
	Smith	61.7%
	Other	0.6%

Ringgold	Brunow	36.1%
	Smith	63.9%

Sac	Brunow	31.9%
	Smith	67.8%
	Other	0.2%

Scott	Brunow	45.0%
	Smith	54.4%
	Other	0.5%

Shelby	Brunow	38.4%
	Smith	61.3%
	Other	0.3%

Sioux	Brunow	17.6%
	Smith	82.2%
	Other	0.2%

Story	Brunow	40.8%
	Smith	58.3%
	Other	0.8%

Tama	Brunow	37.9%
	Smith	61.8%
	Other	0.3%

Taylor	Brunow	38.5%
	Smith	61.5%

Union	Brunow	39.8%
	Smith	60.1%
	Other	0.1%

Van Buren	Brunow	34.8%
	Smith	65.0%
	Other	0.1%

Wapello	Brunow	51.1%
	Smith	48.7%
	Other	0.2%

Warren	Brunow	45.2%
	Smith	54.4%
	Other	0.3%

Washington	Brunow	36.3%
	Smith	63.4%
	Other	0.4%

Wayne	Brunow	52.8%
	Smith	47.2%

Webster	Brunow	47.9%
	Smith	51.9%
	Other	0.3%

Winnebago	Brunow	30.0%
	Smith	70.0%
	Other	0.0%

Winneshiek	Brunow	33.4%
	Smith	65.9%
	Other	0.7%

Woodbury	Brunow	48.0%
	Smith	51.6%
	Other	0.4%

Worth	Brunow	38.2%
	Smith	61.8%
	Other	0.0%

Wright	Brunow	38.1%
	Smith	61.8%
	Other	0.1%

National DataGraph for 1978 - Iowa Results for 1978

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved