Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2015-01-12

Map

Map

Adams	Bayh	55.4%
	Mutz	44.6%

Allen	Bayh	48.1%
	Mutz	51.9%

Bartholomew	Bayh	46.9%
	Mutz	53.1%

Benton	Bayh	49.2%
	Mutz	50.8%

Blackford	Bayh	57.4%
	Mutz	42.6%

Boone	Bayh	38.9%
	Mutz	61.1%

Brown	Bayh	52.6%
	Mutz	47.4%

Carroll	Bayh	51.1%
	Mutz	48.9%

Cass	Bayh	53.0%
	Mutz	47.0%

Clark	Bayh	62.4%
	Mutz	37.6%

Clay	Bayh	63.1%
	Mutz	36.9%

Clinton	Bayh	48.0%
	Mutz	52.0%

Crawford	Bayh	58.9%
	Mutz	41.1%

Daviess	Bayh	51.0%
	Mutz	49.0%

Dearborn	Bayh	53.0%
	Mutz	47.0%

Decatur	Bayh	51.6%
	Mutz	48.4%

DeKalb	Bayh	41.6%
	Mutz	58.4%

Delaware	Bayh	56.1%
	Mutz	43.9%

Dubois	Bayh	61.0%
	Mutz	39.0%

Elkhart	Bayh	46.0%
	Mutz	54.0%

Fayette	Bayh	54.5%
	Mutz	45.5%

Floyd	Bayh	58.6%
	Mutz	41.4%

Fountain	Bayh	52.3%
	Mutz	47.7%

Franklin	Bayh	56.9%
	Mutz	43.1%

Fulton	Bayh	54.7%
	Mutz	45.3%

Gibson	Bayh	65.3%
	Mutz	34.7%

Grant	Bayh	50.0%
	Mutz	50.0%

Greene	Bayh	61.3%
	Mutz	38.7%

Hamilton	Bayh	29.7%
	Mutz	70.3%

Hancock	Bayh	44.8%
	Mutz	55.2%

Harrison	Bayh	65.3%
	Mutz	34.7%

Hendricks	Bayh	37.6%
	Mutz	62.4%

Henry	Bayh	55.8%
	Mutz	44.2%

Howard	Bayh	50.0%
	Mutz	50.0%

Huntington	Bayh	46.8%
	Mutz	53.2%

Jackson	Bayh	56.8%
	Mutz	43.2%

Jasper	Bayh	49.4%
	Mutz	50.6%

Jay	Bayh	54.4%
	Mutz	45.6%

Jefferson	Bayh	57.6%
	Mutz	42.4%

Jennings	Bayh	58.6%
	Mutz	41.4%

Johnson	Bayh	42.5%
	Mutz	57.5%

Knox	Bayh	60.8%
	Mutz	39.2%

Kosciusko	Bayh	41.7%
	Mutz	58.3%

LaGrange	Bayh	52.1%
	Mutz	47.9%

Lake	Bayh	67.9%
	Mutz	32.1%

LaPorte	Bayh	63.0%
	Mutz	37.0%

Lawrence	Bayh	53.2%
	Mutz	46.8%

Madison	Bayh	54.3%
	Mutz	45.7%

Marion	Bayh	48.1%
	Mutz	51.9%

Marshall	Bayh	48.8%
	Mutz	51.2%

Martin	Bayh	61.5%
	Mutz	38.5%

Miami	Bayh	49.7%
	Mutz	50.3%

Monroe	Bayh	51.8%
	Mutz	48.2%

Montgomery	Bayh	41.0%
	Mutz	59.0%

Morgan	Bayh	41.6%
	Mutz	58.4%

Newton	Bayh	51.2%
	Mutz	48.8%

Noble	Bayh	55.5%
	Mutz	44.5%

Ohio	Bayh	56.1%
	Mutz	43.9%

Orange	Bayh	51.7%
	Mutz	48.3%

Owen	Bayh	55.8%
	Mutz	44.2%

Parke	Bayh	56.3%
	Mutz	43.7%

Perry	Bayh	66.2%
	Mutz	33.8%

Pike	Bayh	64.4%
	Mutz	35.6%

Porter	Bayh	56.1%
	Mutz	43.9%

Posey	Bayh	61.3%
	Mutz	38.7%

Pulaski	Bayh	52.9%
	Mutz	47.1%

Putnam	Bayh	51.8%
	Mutz	48.2%

Randolph	Bayh	52.0%
	Mutz	48.0%

Ripley	Bayh	52.7%
	Mutz	47.3%

Rush	Bayh	50.9%
	Mutz	49.1%

St. Joseph	Bayh	58.9%
	Mutz	41.1%

Scott	Bayh	61.1%
	Mutz	38.9%

Shelby	Bayh	50.0%
	Mutz	50.0%

Spencer	Bayh	55.0%
	Mutz	45.0%

Starke	Bayh	62.5%
	Mutz	37.5%

Steuben	Bayh	50.0%
	Mutz	50.0%

Sullivan	Bayh	70.5%
	Mutz	29.5%

Switzerland	Bayh	61.0%
	Mutz	39.0%

Tippecanoe	Bayh	44.5%
	Mutz	55.5%

Tipton	Bayh	46.9%
	Mutz	53.1%

Union	Bayh	45.8%
	Mutz	54.2%

Vanderburgh	Bayh	56.0%
	Mutz	44.0%

Vermillion	Bayh	71.9%
	Mutz	28.1%

Vigo	Bayh	67.0%
	Mutz	33.0%

Wabash	Bayh	48.1%
	Mutz	51.9%

Warren	Bayh	54.2%
	Mutz	45.8%

Warrick	Bayh	57.7%
	Mutz	42.3%

Washington	Bayh	56.1%
	Mutz	43.9%

Wayne	Bayh	50.4%
	Mutz	49.6%

Wells	Bayh	49.7%
	Mutz	50.3%

White	Bayh	52.1%
	Mutz	47.9%

Whitley	Bayh	53.1%
	Mutz	46.9%

National DataGraph for 1988 - Indiana Results for 1988

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved