Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-10-18

Map

Map

Adams	Bayh	47.9%
	Quayle	52.1%

Allen	Bayh	41.5%
	Quayle	58.5%

Bartholomew	Bayh	41.3%
	Quayle	58.7%

Benton	Bayh	40.8%
	Quayle	59.2%

Blackford	Bayh	48.1%
	Quayle	51.9%

Boone	Bayh	34.4%
	Quayle	65.6%

Brown	Bayh	46.5%
	Quayle	53.5%

Carroll	Bayh	41.8%
	Quayle	58.2%

Cass	Bayh	39.6%
	Quayle	60.4%

Clark	Bayh	51.4%
	Quayle	48.6%

Clay	Bayh	45.4%
	Quayle	54.6%

Clinton	Bayh	43.5%
	Quayle	56.5%

Crawford	Bayh	51.0%
	Quayle	49.0%

Daviess	Bayh	44.4%
	Quayle	55.6%

Dearborn	Bayh	51.5%
	Quayle	48.5%

Decatur	Bayh	40.3%
	Quayle	59.7%

DeKalb	Bayh	43.8%
	Quayle	56.2%

Delaware	Bayh	47.1%
	Quayle	52.9%

Dubois	Bayh	54.8%
	Quayle	45.2%

Elkhart	Bayh	36.6%
	Quayle	63.4%

Fayette	Bayh	45.4%
	Quayle	54.6%

Floyd	Bayh	51.3%
	Quayle	48.7%

Fountain	Bayh	41.3%
	Quayle	58.7%

Franklin	Bayh	50.0%
	Quayle	50.0%

Fulton	Bayh	40.0%
	Quayle	60.0%

Gibson	Bayh	57.6%
	Quayle	42.4%

Grant	Bayh	42.3%
	Quayle	57.7%

Greene	Bayh	53.3%
	Quayle	46.7%

Hamilton	Bayh	26.2%
	Quayle	73.8%

Hancock	Bayh	36.4%
	Quayle	63.6%

Harrison	Bayh	50.1%
	Quayle	49.9%

Hendricks	Bayh	33.9%
	Quayle	66.1%

Henry	Bayh	44.4%
	Quayle	55.6%

Howard	Bayh	44.6%
	Quayle	55.4%

Huntington	Bayh	41.0%
	Quayle	59.0%

Jackson	Bayh	44.7%
	Quayle	55.3%

Jasper	Bayh	36.2%
	Quayle	63.8%

Jay	Bayh	42.9%
	Quayle	57.1%

Jefferson	Bayh	48.1%
	Quayle	51.9%

Jennings	Bayh	47.5%
	Quayle	52.5%

Johnson	Bayh	36.2%
	Quayle	63.8%

Knox	Bayh	48.1%
	Quayle	51.9%

Kosciusko	Bayh	31.1%
	Quayle	68.9%

LaGrange	Bayh	36.1%
	Quayle	63.9%

Lake	Bayh	59.4%
	Quayle	40.6%

LaPorte	Bayh	46.0%
	Quayle	54.0%

Lawrence	Bayh	41.1%
	Quayle	58.9%

Madison	Bayh	44.3%
	Quayle	55.7%

Marion	Bayh	46.7%
	Quayle	53.3%

Marshall	Bayh	39.4%
	Quayle	60.6%

Martin	Bayh	50.6%
	Quayle	49.4%

Miami	Bayh	43.3%
	Quayle	56.7%

Monroe	Bayh	50.4%
	Quayle	49.6%

Montgomery	Bayh	34.0%
	Quayle	66.0%

Morgan	Bayh	34.6%
	Quayle	65.4%

Newton	Bayh	44.4%
	Quayle	55.6%

Noble	Bayh	43.9%
	Quayle	56.1%

Ohio	Bayh	56.0%
	Quayle	44.0%

Orange	Bayh	45.8%
	Quayle	54.2%

Owen	Bayh	47.2%
	Quayle	52.8%

Parke	Bayh	39.6%
	Quayle	60.4%

Perry	Bayh	58.0%
	Quayle	42.0%

Pike	Bayh	59.2%
	Quayle	40.8%

Porter	Bayh	42.3%
	Quayle	57.7%

Posey	Bayh	53.5%
	Quayle	46.5%

Pulaski	Bayh	39.5%
	Quayle	60.5%

Putnam	Bayh	42.0%
	Quayle	58.0%

Randolph	Bayh	41.5%
	Quayle	58.5%

Ripley	Bayh	53.9%
	Quayle	46.1%

Rush	Bayh	37.9%
	Quayle	62.1%

St. Joseph	Bayh	51.6%
	Quayle	48.4%

Scott	Bayh	54.1%
	Quayle	45.9%

Shelby	Bayh	42.9%
	Quayle	57.1%

Spencer	Bayh	48.2%
	Quayle	51.8%

Starke	Bayh	50.1%
	Quayle	49.9%

Steuben	Bayh	37.1%
	Quayle	62.9%

Sullivan	Bayh	58.7%
	Quayle	41.3%

Switzerland	Bayh	58.7%
	Quayle	41.3%

Tippecanoe	Bayh	41.6%
	Quayle	58.4%

Tipton	Bayh	38.6%
	Quayle	61.4%

Union	Bayh	41.5%
	Quayle	58.5%

Vanderburgh	Bayh	54.6%
	Quayle	45.4%

Vermillion	Bayh	52.1%
	Quayle	47.9%

Vigo	Bayh	53.2%
	Quayle	46.8%

Wabash	Bayh	39.6%
	Quayle	60.4%

Warren	Bayh	41.7%
	Quayle	58.3%

Warrick	Bayh	55.5%
	Quayle	44.5%

Washington	Bayh	43.3%
	Quayle	56.7%

Wayne	Bayh	42.6%
	Quayle	57.4%

Wells	Bayh	45.7%
	Quayle	54.3%

White	Bayh	39.4%
	Quayle	60.6%

Whitley	Bayh	44.4%
	Quayle	55.6%

National DataGraph for 1980 - Indiana Results for 1980

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved