Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2009-12-18

Map

Map

Adams	Hartigan	49.4%
	Fahner	49.1%
	Other	1.6%

Alexander	Hartigan	61.1%
	Fahner	37.7%
	Other	1.1%

Bond	Hartigan	49.2%
	Fahner	49.7%
	Other	1.2%

Boone	Hartigan	41.0%
	Fahner	57.2%
	Other	1.8%

Brown	Hartigan	55.9%
	Fahner	43.1%
	Other	1.0%

Bureau	Hartigan	48.2%
	Fahner	50.4%
	Other	1.4%

Calhoun	Hartigan	53.6%
	Fahner	44.5%
	Other	1.9%

Carroll	Hartigan	43.4%
	Fahner	55.1%
	Other	1.5%

Cass	Hartigan	57.2%
	Fahner	42.2%
	Other	0.6%

Champaign	Hartigan	49.3%
	Fahner	49.2%
	Other	1.6%

Christian	Hartigan	60.7%
	Fahner	38.3%
	Other	1.0%

Clark	Hartigan	49.2%
	Fahner	49.6%
	Other	1.2%

Clay	Hartigan	48.0%
	Fahner	50.7%
	Other	1.3%

Clinton	Hartigan	47.4%
	Fahner	51.1%
	Other	1.5%

Coles	Hartigan	49.4%
	Fahner	49.2%
	Other	1.3%

Cook	Hartigan	65.7%
	Fahner	32.9%
	Other	1.4%

Crawford	Hartigan	48.1%
	Fahner	50.4%
	Other	1.5%

Cumberland	Hartigan	54.2%
	Fahner	44.7%
	Other	1.1%

DeKalb	Hartigan	42.5%
	Fahner	55.4%
	Other	2.1%

De Witt	Hartigan	47.0%
	Fahner	51.4%
	Other	1.6%

Douglas	Hartigan	50.1%
	Fahner	49.0%
	Other	0.9%

DuPage	Hartigan	35.6%
	Fahner	62.4%
	Other	1.9%

Edgar	Hartigan	49.9%
	Fahner	48.8%
	Other	1.3%

Edwards	Hartigan	38.8%
	Fahner	59.4%
	Other	1.8%

Effingham	Hartigan	50.4%
	Fahner	48.6%
	Other	1.0%

Fayette	Hartigan	46.9%
	Fahner	52.7%
	Other	0.4%

Ford	Hartigan	35.8%
	Fahner	63.1%
	Other	1.1%

Franklin	Hartigan	64.5%
	Fahner	34.4%
	Other	1.1%

Fulton	Hartigan	63.7%
	Fahner	35.1%
	Other	1.2%

Gallatin	Hartigan	66.2%
	Fahner	32.7%
	Other	1.1%

Greene	Hartigan	49.3%
	Fahner	48.7%
	Other	2.0%

Grundy	Hartigan	47.6%
	Fahner	50.9%
	Other	1.5%

Hamilton	Hartigan	53.1%
	Fahner	46.2%
	Other	0.6%

Hancock	Hartigan	47.7%
	Fahner	51.2%
	Other	1.2%

Hardin	Hartigan	50.3%
	Fahner	48.0%
	Other	1.7%

Henderson	Hartigan	49.9%
	Fahner	48.9%
	Other	1.2%

Henry	Hartigan	48.5%
	Fahner	49.9%
	Other	1.6%

Iroquois	Hartigan	37.3%
	Fahner	61.7%
	Other	1.0%

Jackson	Hartigan	47.0%
	Fahner	50.9%
	Other	2.1%

Jasper	Hartigan	60.7%
	Fahner	38.3%
	Other	1.0%

Jefferson	Hartigan	57.1%
	Fahner	41.9%
	Other	1.0%

Jersey	Hartigan	53.3%
	Fahner	45.1%
	Other	1.6%

Jo Daviess	Hartigan	46.7%
	Fahner	51.5%
	Other	1.8%

Johnson	Hartigan	38.2%
	Fahner	60.5%
	Other	1.3%

Kane	Hartigan	40.2%
	Fahner	57.9%
	Other	1.9%

Kankakee	Hartigan	48.8%
	Fahner	50.1%
	Other	1.1%

Kendall	Hartigan	33.5%
	Fahner	65.0%
	Other	1.5%

Knox	Hartigan	51.6%
	Fahner	46.9%
	Other	1.5%

Lake	Hartigan	41.5%
	Fahner	56.5%
	Other	2.0%

LaSalle	Hartigan	51.6%
	Fahner	47.1%
	Other	1.4%

Lawrence	Hartigan	52.4%
	Fahner	45.8%
	Other	1.8%

Lee	Hartigan	42.3%
	Fahner	56.4%
	Other	1.3%

Livingston	Hartigan	36.9%
	Fahner	61.9%
	Other	1.2%

Logan	Hartigan	38.6%
	Fahner	60.5%
	Other	1.0%

McDonough	Hartigan	46.0%
	Fahner	52.6%
	Other	1.4%

McHenry	Hartigan	34.1%
	Fahner	63.8%
	Other	2.1%

McLean	Hartigan	43.9%
	Fahner	54.8%
	Other	1.2%

Macon	Hartigan	61.3%
	Fahner	37.8%
	Other	1.0%

Macoupin	Hartigan	55.3%
	Fahner	43.6%
	Other	1.1%

Madison	Hartigan	58.1%
	Fahner	40.7%
	Other	1.2%

Marion	Hartigan	53.6%
	Fahner	45.2%
	Other	1.1%

Marshall	Hartigan	48.1%
	Fahner	50.5%
	Other	1.4%

Mason	Hartigan	59.6%
	Fahner	39.8%
	Other	0.6%

Massac	Hartigan	49.2%
	Fahner	49.4%
	Other	1.4%

Menard	Hartigan	45.9%
	Fahner	53.2%
	Other	1.0%

Mercer	Hartigan	52.5%
	Fahner	45.4%
	Other	2.1%

Monroe	Hartigan	41.1%
	Fahner	57.1%
	Other	1.7%

Montgomery	Hartigan	53.1%
	Fahner	46.1%
	Other	0.8%

Morgan	Hartigan	50.0%
	Fahner	48.6%
	Other	1.3%

Moultrie	Hartigan	58.4%
	Fahner	40.1%
	Other	1.4%

Ogle	Hartigan	38.4%
	Fahner	60.0%
	Other	1.6%

Peoria	Hartigan	54.7%
	Fahner	44.1%
	Other	1.2%

Perry	Hartigan	56.8%
	Fahner	42.0%
	Other	1.2%

Piatt	Hartigan	49.9%
	Fahner	49.2%
	Other	0.9%

Pike	Hartigan	56.0%
	Fahner	42.8%
	Other	1.2%

Pope	Hartigan	44.7%
	Fahner	53.9%
	Other	1.4%

Pulaski	Hartigan	51.6%
	Fahner	47.2%
	Other	1.2%

Putnam	Hartigan	52.0%
	Fahner	47.1%
	Other	0.9%

Randolph	Hartigan	55.7%
	Fahner	42.6%
	Other	1.7%

Richland	Hartigan	44.4%
	Fahner	54.3%
	Other	1.3%

Rock Island	Hartigan	60.3%
	Fahner	37.3%
	Other	2.4%

St. Clair	Hartigan	62.3%
	Fahner	36.3%
	Other	1.4%

Saline	Hartigan	58.4%
	Fahner	41.1%
	Other	0.5%

Sangamon	Hartigan	49.7%
	Fahner	49.5%
	Other	0.8%

Schuyler	Hartigan	53.8%
	Fahner	45.2%
	Other	1.1%

Scott	Hartigan	45.2%
	Fahner	53.9%
	Other	0.9%

Shelby	Hartigan	57.6%
	Fahner	41.3%
	Other	1.1%

Stark	Hartigan	43.2%
	Fahner	55.3%
	Other	1.6%

Stephenson	Hartigan	44.1%
	Fahner	54.0%
	Other	1.9%

Tazewell	Hartigan	53.7%
	Fahner	45.0%
	Other	1.3%

Union	Hartigan	53.5%
	Fahner	44.6%
	Other	2.0%

Vermilion	Hartigan	52.8%
	Fahner	46.2%
	Other	1.0%

Wabash	Hartigan	52.3%
	Fahner	45.9%
	Other	1.8%

Warren	Hartigan	39.0%
	Fahner	60.1%
	Other	1.0%

Washington	Hartigan	40.7%
	Fahner	59.0%
	Other	0.3%

Wayne	Hartigan	44.3%
	Fahner	54.0%
	Other	1.7%

White	Hartigan	55.2%
	Fahner	43.4%
	Other	1.3%

Whiteside	Hartigan	46.9%
	Fahner	51.7%
	Other	1.4%

Will	Hartigan	51.3%
	Fahner	46.8%
	Other	1.9%

Williamson	Hartigan	52.0%
	Fahner	46.9%
	Other	1.1%

Winnebago	Hartigan	53.9%
	Fahner	44.5%
	Other	1.6%

Woodford	Hartigan	39.6%
	Fahner	59.4%
	Other	1.1%

National DataGraph for 1982 - Illinois Results for 1982

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved